No. The eye-test shows that he has some bad games as well, especially when it comes to defending. He's a overall good player and your best D. But do I think there are better defenders in a similar age? Heiskanen, Seiders and others? Yeah I do. Keep on showing fancy stats and convince yourself about whatever you want.
The thing is, who knows if its your shitty system or franchise status and if he would actually be good elsewhere. But I'm not saying he completely shit like Powers. Dahlin is a good player but not as good as many seem to hype him up to. He needs to better at defending before I consider him ever being or becoming close to say Hedman and others level.
For me personally Dahlin isn't even a top3 Swedish D in todays NHL. He needs better defending D's around him because he's not good enough there. You'll see this when Sweden plays the 4 nation tournament.
He's not at all similar in style to EK65 but sometimes I just think some D's are good or produce in a season but their style of playing or- strengths and weaknesses will not win you cups and playoffs. EK65 oozes just that, at least in the NHL and for me. Dahlin could in worst case scenario become that. He doesn't play like EK65 but he sure does remind me more of him than say Hedman. Because he can produce and do flashy things in offense but what do you achieve with that? Being a good individual? Yeah perhaps. What more? And if you look at Sabres roster and system and talent level, that's not what you guys need. Individuals thinking about their own greatness. He's like your Eichel but in D, or actually perhaps not on that level even yet.
Another example is a D like Quinn Hughes. Some fans claim he's so good yapping there, yapping here and bla bla. I just don't even see the Canucks winning anything if he's your first guy in a franchise.
Of course you have a guy like Makar but he's a genius compared to other offensive minded D's. He's even won cups with mediocre goaltending. Quinn and Dahlin won't do that and neither won't most others.
Every player has bad games, what nonsense. How many of Dahlin's games have you seen in the last three seasons? If you don't see many games, you look at the metrics and you find out what Sabres fans think. No one is saying Dahlin is the best defenseman in the league, but he's up there with guys like Fox, Heiskanen, and guys like that. You have no idea what kind of player he is and you're making bad judgments based on some games.
Given the circumstances of this franchise, Dahlin was thrown into a tough environment right away and didn't have any good coaches or defensive partners around him, but he was one of the best defensemen in the NHL in 22-23 season, he played really well and his metrics were better than Fox and Makar and better than EK65. Dahlin is better than EK65 in defensively and he's a physical monster compared to Karlsson, even if he didn't score as many points.
This season he played with a back injury and still showed good play, although not consistently. Now the team can't do anything without him, they can't even last one period without him without allowing four goals.
He is an elite defenseman of the franchise, who plays 25 minutes a game, sometimes more, can play defense, is good at physical play, can play offense, so yeah, he is up there with these guys among the best, even if the franchise is trying to kill every player, he has not given up yet and continues to go.
Makar and Hughes are a little different type of players due to their skating and speed, but I disagree with you on this one too, I like Hughes more. You don't even understand the problem and are trying to be an expert, good luck.