Toggle sidebar

Player Discussion Tocchet What Is/How He Doing?

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
I remember some posters wondering last season whether or not there was a 'shelf life' for Tocchet's style of coaching.

It requires an incredible amount of effort and commitment from every guy on the ice, up and down the lineup. It's a grind to play it game in, and game out. And inevitably it seems, his teams just start to back-slide.

Seems to me that's what happened to his teams in Arizona, and it's happening again in Vancouver. Then again, the coach can't do much about the personnel he's been given. This Canuck blueline was a disaster waiting to happen. And when Cole and Zadorov left and then when Hronek went down, it's basically imploded.

Tocchet will ride out this season and survive. But if the Canucks are slow out of the gate next season, all bets are off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mdobbs and calnuck
IMG_2639.jpeg
 
  • Haha
Reactions: HockeyWooot, vadim sharifijanov and calnuck
I have mixed feelings about Tocchet at this point.

I think his systems construction is lacking, but that could be solved with adding some experience to the Canucks' very thin coaching roster.

His player management has been generally good, and it's not his fault that divisions from previous regimes are coming back into focus. However, if he was the one who told Miller to "toughen" Pettersson up, that is unfathomable stupid. At this point though, I suspect it might have come from higher up..

Unless the Canucks have a clear upgrade available, I think you have to bring him back next season. If things are back on track at the midseason mark, you extend him, but if not, it's in everyone's best interest to find a different path.
 
  • Like
Reactions: calnuck, F A N and supercanuck
Ernie said:
I have mixed feelings about Tocchet at this point.

I think his systems construction is lacking, but that could be solved with adding some experience to the Canucks' very thin coaching roster.

His player management has been generally good, and it's not his fault that divisions from previous regimes are coming back into focus. However, if he was the one who told Miller to "toughen" Pettersson up, that is unfathomable stupid. At this point though, I suspect it might have come from higher up..

Unless the Canucks have a clear upgrade available, I think you have to bring him back next season. If things are back on track at the midseason mark, you extend him, but if not, it's in everyone's best interest to find a different path.
Click to expand...
I can see us snapping up Laviolette or Sullivan if they become available. Will we give a rookie head coach (David Carle? Marc Savard?) a shot?
 
Tocchet talking about needing a 4 man set to be a rush team. That the defense has to jump up in the play and overload the opposition.

Looks at defense:

1737592335119.png
 
Last edited:
Losing and playing a boring style, both resulting in an increase in empty seats, is a bad sign for the coach. Allvin and Jimmy are loyal to the guy, though, and did rather embarrass themselves with the whole Boudreau saga to facilitate getting him in here. Crazy times for such a short tenure.

Horrible team to watch play. I remember in the Coliseum during the dog days of the 80s, with just an organ for ambience and no piped in music and shenanigans, what crowd was there would go silent for excruciatingly long stretches only to be broken up by a lone, loud "B-O-R-I-N-G!" from way up in the blues or greens. Sometimes that would get the loudest cheer of the evening.
 
Tochett looks defeated himself. The Pettersson/Miller saga has taken its toll on everyone including the coach. At this rate the Canucks will be running the coach right out of town.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom