Player Discussion Tim Stützle - L̶W̶/C - Part V

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nova Stutzlia

Registered User
Oct 23, 2021
1,961
1,549
If a 20 year old putting up those raw numbers ain’t impressive it’s agree too disagree
I phased it that way for the benefit of those who think he should be closer to perfect, or something like that.
I've been a Timmy fan from day one - check my user name.
👍
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dionysus

Agent Zuuuub

Registered User
Jan 2, 2015
15,282
12,737
If a 20 year old putting up those raw numbers ain’t impressive it’s agree too disagree

Scoring is so wack though. I think we are still wired to think of 1 ppg guys as elite, when in reality you don't even need to be a true star to hit those numbers anymore.
 

robsenz

Registered User
Apr 15, 2007
3,606
2,480
Probably his best game of the season, but man, I wish he didn't take himself out of the play as a legitimate threat to shoot the puck, Team needs to create some chaos in front of the net, any shot on net can do that. Way too much perimeter passing that's leading to turnovers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dionysus

Dionysus

Registered User
Oct 7, 2007
5,927
3,449
Around the bend
Probably his best game of the season, but man, I wish he didn't take himself out of the play as a legitimate threat to shoot the puck, Team needs to create some chaos in front of the net, any shot on net can do that. Way too much perimeter passing that's leading to turnovers.
It will come. If he can dial in his accuracy a bit and gains some confidence it will make him a dual threat to shoot or pass.

Right now he shoots high and wide way too often. Wants to pick a corner but just needs to hit the net to start.

The whole team is guilty of overpassing on the perimeter and missing the net when they do shoot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ice-Tray

Qward

Because! That's why!
Jul 23, 2010
19,039
6,072
Behind you, look out
49 in 48 now
So, because hes had games with no points, he is actually 50pts in 50 games since Feb 15th 2022


Game #DateTeamGAPSum
114-Novvs NYI0222
212-Nov@ PHI1124
310-Nov@ NJD0004
408-Novvs VAN1126
505-Novvs PHI0117
603-Novvs VGK2029
701-Nov@ TBL0009
829-Oct@ FLA0009
927-Octvs MIN0009
1024-Octvs DAL01110
1122-Octvs ARI02212
1220-Octvs WSH00012
1318-Octvs BOS12315
1415-Oct@ TOR00015
1513-Oct@ BUF00015
1629-Apr@ PHI01116
1728-Aprvs FLA00016
1826-Aprvs NJD22420
1923-Aprvs MTL00020
2022-Apr@ CBJ00020
2119-Apr@ VAN01121
2218-Apr@ SEA00021
2316-Aprvs TOR20223
2414-Apr@ BOS12326
2512-Apr@ DET21329
2610-Aprvs WPG01130
2705-Apr@ MTL10131
2803-Aprvs DET01132
2901-Apr@ DET01133
3029-Mar@ NSH01134
3126-Marvs FLA00034
3224-Mar@ WPG02236
3322-Mar@ NYI00036
3419-Mar@ MTL01137
3518-Marvs PHI10138
3616-Marvs CBJ00038
3714-Marvs ARI01139
3812-Marvs CHI00039
3910-Marvs SEA01140
4008-Mar@ STL12343
4106-Mar@ VGK01144
4205-Mar@ ARI02246
4303-Mar@ FLA00046
4401-Mar@ TBL00046
4526-Febvs MTL00046
4622-Febvs MIN10147
4720-Febvs NYR10148
4819-Febvs BOS10149
4917-Feb@ BUF00049
5015-Febvs STL10150
 

Mingus Dew

Microphone Assassin
Oct 7, 2013
5,632
4,194
Scoring is so wack though. I think we are still wired to think of 1 ppg guys as elite, when in reality you don't even need to be a true star to hit those numbers anymore.

This.

Stu is PPG yet he is 59th in league scoring.

PPG is basically a top 6 player.
 

Mingus Dew

Microphone Assassin
Oct 7, 2013
5,632
4,194
Basically top 6? Considering there’s 192 top 6 slots. I’d say it’s a bit more than that.

Not all guys that play in the their team's top 6 are top 6 players but sort of irrelevant.

To refocus my point, if Stu is going to be an elite player in this league he should be PPG at a minimum this year.
 

Korpse

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 5, 2010
20,978
9,873
Not all guys that play in the their team's top 6 are top 6 players but sort of irrelevant.

To refocus my point, if Stu is going to be an elite player in this league he should be PPG at a minimum this year.

No literally there are 192 top 6 spots in the league. That’s what defines top 6, not an arbitrary standard.

If he doesn’t hit PPG at minimum this year can he still be an elite player in the future? It’s such an odd demand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alf Silfversson

Mingus Dew

Microphone Assassin
Oct 7, 2013
5,632
4,194
No literally there are 192 top 6 spots in the league. That’s what defines top 6, not an arbitrary standard.

If he doesn’t hit PPG at minimum this year can he still be an elite player in the future? It’s such an odd demand.

It's not a demand it's an opinionated assessment lol. Of course anything is possible.

I'm glad Stu is producing at the level he is. I think that was expected of him given the offensive talent surrounding him and what he was drafted to do.

He could falter this year and still break out or he could take longer to blossom like Mackinnon. But steady linear progression is probably a surer sign of continued improvement into elite territory.

That would mean he’s basically a top line player.

Yes you and @Guuse are right to call me on that comment.

What I should have said is that being PPG does not make you an elite NHL forward in this day and age.
 

Pinto Bean

Registered User
Sep 13, 2009
882
565
Ottawa
Tim has been getting better & more noticeable as the season has been progressing IMO. Even though the Sens were 4-2 at one point, I thought Tim was rather unnoticable early on this season. Seemed like the puck was bouncing on him more and he didn't seem to have the puck as much as you'd like him to have it. Perhaps that was a byproduct of having a healthier lineup (Norris, etc).

He's still making his mistakes and over-doing things at times, but I'd say he's been far more noticeable the last 5 or so games and his production lines up with that. He's not perfect but he's got a significant lead on u21 scoring and I think he's progressing at a nice rate early on. Hoping this progress continues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JackieDaytona

Burrowsaurus

Registered User
Mar 20, 2013
44,438
17,456
It's not a demand it's an opinionated assessment lol. Of course anything is possible.

I'm glad Stu is producing at the level he is. I think that was expected of him given the offensive talent surrounding him and what he was drafted to do.

He could falter this year and still break out or he could take longer to blossom like Mackinnon. But steady linear progression is probably a surer sign of continued improvement into elite territory.



Yes you and @Guuse are right to call me on that comment.

What I should have said is that being PPG does not make you an elite NHL forward in this day and age.
Well we will see how the season ends. I think ppg and decent two play is elite
 

Nova Stutzlia

Registered User
Oct 23, 2021
1,961
1,549
Tim has been getting better & more noticeable as the season has been progressing IMO. Even though the Sens were 4-2 at one point, I thought Tim was rather unnoticable early on this season. Seemed like the puck was bouncing on him more and he didn't seem to have the puck as much as you'd like him to have it. Perhaps that was a byproduct of having a healthier lineup (Norris, etc).

He's still making his mistakes and over-doing things at times, but I'd say he's been far more noticeable the last 5 or so games and his production lines up with that. He's not perfect but he's got a significant lead on u21 scoring and I think he's progressing at a nice rate early on. Hoping this progress continues.
9 points in his last 6 games.
I'd be shocked if he's not above a point/game at season's end.

In the last 2 months of last season he scored at an 88 point pace, and in the last month alone
he scored at a 105 pace. Check it out here:

 

Pinto Bean

Registered User
Sep 13, 2009
882
565
Ottawa
9 points in his last 6 games.
I'd be shocked if he's not above a point/game at season's end.

In the last 2 months of last season he scored at an 88 point pace, and in the last month alone
he scored at a 105 pace. Check it out here:

If last season and early-on this season is an indication of anything, Stutzle is an athlete who gets better and more into game shape as the season gets going.

No matter how hard you train in the off-season, there is no better way to getting acclimated to game pace & rhythm than actually playing the games and Timmy might be that kinda player.
 

Korpse

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 5, 2010
20,978
9,873
It's not a demand it's an opinionated assessment lol. Of course anything is possible.

I'm glad Stu is producing at the level he is. I think that was expected of him given the offensive talent surrounding him and what he was drafted to do.

He could falter this year and still break out or he could take longer to blossom like Mackinnon. But steady linear progression is probably a surer sign of continued improvement into elite territory.

Production isn't always a sign of progression though. It can be but there's too much variance where players can improve and it doesn't always show up in offensive output. I don't think its fair to place a number on any player and say they need to meet it to be on track.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad