Player Discussion Tim Stützle - (C) - Part VI

LuckyPierre

Registered User
Jul 1, 2010
2,045
739
Not unless Nashville is paying us assets to take on Stamkos.

Norris would be a good fit for them, but even if he got injured, they have assets to make moves and abuse LTIR the way TB and VGS did. We better be getting one of their 3 first round picks back and some other assets.
I hear ya. But don't forget that until the last two months, Norris was a liability, not an asset. Damaged goods with a long, pricey contract. And Stamkos was an asset, not a liability.
 

bicboi64

Registered User
Aug 13, 2020
5,692
3,750
Brampton
I hear ya. But don't forget that until the last two months, Norris was a liability, not an asset. Damaged goods with a long, pricey contract. And Stamkos was an asset, not a liability.
I wouldn't call Norris a liability as much as a huge risk, but point taken.

If management is going to move depth scoring, I'd prefer it be for someone a bit more reliable than Stamkos who is a great vet leader, but his production is god awful especially on 5on5 where we need help.

Stu and Brady are lighting it up on the PP, we need some more ES help
 
  • Like
Reactions: NyQuil and DrEasy

LuckyPierre

Registered User
Jul 1, 2010
2,045
739
I wouldn't call Norris a liability as much as a huge risk, but point taken.

If management is going to move depth scoring, I'd prefer it be for someone a bit more reliable than Stamkos who is a great vet leader, but his production is god awful especially on 5on5 where we need help.

Stu and Brady are lighting it up on the PP, we need some more ES help
And Batherson too - he's leading the team in PP points.

Stamkos did score 40ish ES points last year, and about the same on the PP. This year, he's a black hole at ES, but I believe he's playing one line too high and is overburdened at centre. Shift him to the wing in 1A/1B situation and watch his ES scoring increase, especially with a gifted playmaker at centre to feed him shooting opportunities.

Anyways, this is likely moot as he'd have to waive, and before that, Nashville would have to be willing to trade him. They are in dead last, so that's not impossible, but it is improbable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bicboi64

Knave

Registered User
Mar 6, 2007
22,110
2,829
Ottawa
Wonder if he can play through whatever upper body injury he's going through. He was wincing after hits tonight and not as fast as he usually is or as patient.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrEasy

darude

Registered User
Sponsor
Nov 2, 2024
83
97
Bonkers idea.

Stamkos for Norris. Similar salary/term.

Stammer rides Stutzle's wing and could snipe 30, while playing on PP1.

Pinto replaces Norris with Brady and Batherson. Greig Graduates to 3C.

Stamkos was surrounded with playmaking talent in Tampa where even last year he was a 40-40-80 winger. He's got little support in Nashville and is back to playing centre. Stutzle would bring out the best in him, and Norris would add much needed energy down the middle in Nashville.
This is not a terrible idea. My main concern is his contract sees him to 39 and I have no idea if he's gonna actually play well for those 4 years. Norris will be for sure good for those years, barring injury -- and even then there's LTIR considerations.

I think people are overvaluing Norris and looking at Stamkos' numbers this year as though they're representative of who he is now. But the problem is that unless everyone believes Stamkos is Ovechkin and will just be able to continue to pile up goals into his 40s, past this year or next he will not be as productive as Norris. Which makes the move kind of a desperation "get us into the playoffs" move.

We need to find a guy like Hyman was before last year, who can score about 25-30 without a Stutzle feeding them the puck and can translate that into 50+.

That or if NYR are blowing things up you go hard after a guy like Kreider (doubtful we have the assets to get him and that we're not on his no trade list).

Ideally though, Norris gets back to his pre-injury form and puts up 40.
 

sena

Registered User
Jul 3, 2024
145
90
This is not a terrible idea. My main concern is his contract sees him to 39 and I have no idea if he's gonna actually play well for those 4 years. Norris will be for sure good for those years, barring injury -- and even then there's LTIR considerations.

I think people are overvaluing Norris and looking at Stamkos' numbers this year as though they're representative of who he is now. But the problem is that unless everyone believes Stamkos is Ovechkin and will just be able to continue to pile up goals into his 40s, past this year or next he will not be as productive as Norris. Which makes the move kind of a desperation "get us into the playoffs" move.

We need to find a guy like Hyman was before last year, who can score about 25-30 without a Stutzle feeding them the puck and can translate that into 50+.

That or if NYR are blowing things up you go hard after a guy like Kreider (doubtful we have the assets to get him and that we're not on his no trade list).

Ideally though, Norris gets back to his pre-injury form and puts up 40.
its a brutal idea, Josh is starting to find a roll and working on his defensive game, as far as forwards go he is 27th in hits and 21 in blocked shots, he is one of the faster skaters in the NHL and will score over 30 goals.
Stamkos is old and getting slower every day.
 

OD99

Registered User
Oct 13, 2012
5,353
4,635
I hear ya. But don't forget that until the last two months, Norris was a liability, not an asset. Damaged goods with a long, pricey contract. And Stamkos was an asset, not a liability.
I give you props for a big name trade that isn't totally lopsided and could be considered.

Stamkos still has a lethal shot and could be a nice W for Timmy, although he would be on his backhand getting puck to Stamkos for the most part.

The term on Stamkos scares me off, as does the overall positive impact Norris has.

Also, Greig has regressed and while he can bounce back, I'm not sure I would add more responsibilities at this point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LuckyPierre

Dionysus

Registered User
Oct 7, 2007
6,150
3,706
Around the bend
Really liked his work to out battle Miller and come up with the puck off the tied up faceoff to start OT. Then a great rush and pass to set up his second straight OT winner.

Not dominating games right now, but is night in and night out the best player on the team. Playing a very good team game as well. Not trying to do too much and trusting that his teammates will do their part.
 

bicboi64

Registered User
Aug 13, 2020
5,692
3,750
Brampton
Really liked his work to out battle Miller and come up with the puck off the tied up faceoff to start OT. Then a great rush and pass to set up his second straight OT winner.

Not dominating games right now, but is night in and night out the best player on the team. Playing a very good team game as well. Not trying to do too much and trusting that his teammates will do their part.
I love how despite cooling down production-wise, he's still so noticeable on the ice. Looking forward to him randomly going on a goal scoring heater.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dionysus

JD1

Registered User
Sep 12, 2005
16,420
10,111
I love how despite cooling down production-wise, he's still so noticeable on the ice. Looking forward to him randomly going on a goal scoring heater.
The good news is we've got 5 guys that can get on a heater
Norris
Tkachuk
Stützle
Batherson
Pinto

If any one guy is one a heater at any time, things are good. 3rd and 4th line scoring has picked up a bit. Just need to keep it going now
 
  • Like
Reactions: Good in Osgoode

Senovision

Registered User
May 23, 2011
3,020
2,116
Tim should shoot more. He has a great shot and is accurate.
In 2022-23 he had 228 shots on goal in 78 games. And scored 39 goals.

This year in 34 games he has had 69 shots on goal and has scored 11 goals and is on pace for around 170 shots and 25 goals.

If he can shoot more he will see more biscuits in the basket. Sometimes he doesn't take the shot (like a lot of players) when it presents itself.
 

Icelevel

During these difficult times...
Sponsor
Sep 9, 2009
26,004
6,039
Tim should shoot more. He has a great shot and is accurate.
In 2022-23 he had 228 shots on goal in 78 games. And scored 39 goals.

This year in 34 games he has had 69 shots on goal and has scored 11 goals and is on pace for around 170 shots and 25 goals.

If he can shoot more he will see more biscuits in the basket. Sometimes he doesn't take the shot (like a lot of players) when it presents itself.
Came out of the gate shooting away. Doesn’t seem like he’s doing that anymore
 

Alf Silfversson

Registered User
Jun 8, 2011
6,113
5,274
Tim should shoot more. He has a great shot and is accurate.
In 2022-23 he had 228 shots on goal in 78 games. And scored 39 goals.

This year in 34 games he has had 69 shots on goal and has scored 11 goals and is on pace for around 170 shots and 25 goals.

If he can shoot more he will see more biscuits in the basket. Sometimes he doesn't take the shot (like a lot of players) when it presents itself.

Yup. He's got a really nice shot and it can keep defenses and goalies honest. Needs to use it just a little bit more and the game will open up for him even more.
 

bicboi64

Registered User
Aug 13, 2020
5,692
3,750
Brampton
I figured with Gaudette being off Stu's wing, Stu would shoot more but he's got too much of a playmaking mentality. Classic Spezza like problem.

Stu scored 30g earlier than Spezza did. If he decides to be a bit more selfish, he'll be a 40g regular.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad