Peaked already. 50-60 point guy. Way overpaid .
Actually, would love to see what Terry can do when the Ducks are competitive, have depth, a better PP, and better system and coaching.
Peaked already. 50-60 point guy. Way overpaid .
Or Corey PerryTony Terry would've been a better name.
He's averaged a 34 goal 72 point pace over the last 2 seasons (145gp), so he's not "a 65 point guy"Uh, career high of 67 points and about to turn age 26.
Good player, but I think he kind of is what he is as a 65-point guy and he seems younger than he actually is because he took a long time before he stuck in the NHL.
He's 25 years old and coming off back to back 70+ point pace seasons.Peaked already. 50-60 point guy. Way overpaid .
From what I can tell, there are some Habs fans that are real salty about Zegras being better than Caufield and Suzuki.Just as a Kings fan I’ve noticed Habs fans don’t seem to like Ducks players. Any reason for this?
From what I can tell, Habs fans don't seem to like any player that isn't a HabHe’s good and can potentially break out this year.
Just as a Kings fan I’ve noticed Habs fans don’t seem to like Ducks players. Any reason for this?
I never trust anyone with a first name for a last name
Are you actually quibbling about the difference between 65/67 and 70? He's been stuck on one of the worst teams in the league. I think that with some more talent around him him getting another 3-5 points isn't exactly a huge stretch.Uh, career high of 67 points and about to turn age 26.
Good player, but I think he kind of is what he is as a 65-point guy and he seems younger than he actually is because he took a long time before he stuck in the NHL.
Are you actually quibbling about the difference between 65/67 and 70? He's been stuck on one of the worst teams in the league. I think that with some more talent around him him getting another 3-5 points isn't exactly a huge stretch.
He’s not just an offensive player. He’s actually good defensively, so if his offense goes away, he could be a bottom 6 player. He’s nothing like James Neal in that regard.Good now, but high probability he falls off quicker than most. He doesn't have any tangibles to suggest he'd be a good 3rd or 4th liner when he declines. Similar to James Neal.
"I have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about" would have been a more concise and accurate statement.Good now, but high probability he falls off quicker than most. He doesn't have any tangibles to suggest he'd be a good 3rd or 4th liner when he declines. Similar to James Neal.
Yeah, he's such a well rounded player with 30 hits, 0 shorthanded points and a faceoff percentage of 32% in 274 NHL games."I have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about" would have been a more concise and accurate statement.
I would gladly take a few players with terrys puck hound mentality on a third line. No doubt about it.Yeah, he's such a well rounded player with 30 hits, 0 shorthanded points and a faceoff percentage of 32% in 274 NHL games.
You're joking, right?Yeah, he's such a well rounded player with 30 hits, 0 shorthanded points and a faceoff percentage of 32% in 274 NHL games.