This is our best top 6 (at forward) since.....?

Frk It

Mo Seider Less Problems
Jul 27, 2010
36,732
15,502
Well per the tweet 8 mintues ago from Ansar Khan, looks like we are going to open the season with a top 6 of DeBrincat, Larkin, Raymond, Kane, Compher, Tarasenko.

Not sure about the rest of the lineup, but I think that is a pretty good top 6. (I know Kane and Tarasenko are older, but still)

Is this the best top 6 we have had since Datsyuk or Z were on the team? What do you all think?
 

ShanahanMan

Registered User
Jan 31, 2009
3,139
1,728
Tokyo, Japan
Well per the tweet 8 mintues ago from Ansar Khan, looks like we are going to open the season with a top 6 of DeBrincat, Larkin, Raymond, Kane, Compher, Tarasenko.

Not sure about the rest of the lineup, but I think that is a pretty good top 6. (I know Kane and Tarasenko are older, but still)

Is this the best top 6 we have had since Datsyuk or Z were on the team? What do you all think?
Compher is a 3rd/4th line C playing a 2nd line role. If we had a good center there I would agree but that downgrades the line significantly
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boss Man Hughes

Retire91

Stevey Y you our Guy
May 31, 2010
6,281
1,722
We have been playing forward units for a long time now that I would not even consider NHL level forward units. This is the first season since I can remember in a long time where we are icing a legit top 6. Our second unit is past its prime but that is a lot of competency. Yes this is easily the best forward group we have had since the last time the wings were relevant

Compher is in a 'best we can do for now' position which I agree downgrades the line significantly. If we hav e aprospect winger and C land in the next 1 or 2 seasons we will really be cooking.
 

ShanahanMan

Registered User
Jan 31, 2009
3,139
1,728
Tokyo, Japan
Find me a 3/4C that puts up 50 points.
He'll have higher points because again, he's being forced to play 2C and with really good linemates. However if we want to talk about skill level, I would say the majority of teams have a better 2C and some even a better 3C (Lowry, Lundell, Henrique, Haula)

Compher is definitely not a 4C he’s a great 3C imo
"Good" 3C I'll agree with.
 

Frk It

Mo Seider Less Problems
Jul 27, 2010
36,732
15,502
He'll have higher points because again, he's being forced to play 2C and with really good linemates. However if we want to talk about skill level, I would say the majority of teams have a better 2C and some even a better 3C (Lowry, Lundell, Henrique, Haula)


"Good" 3C I'll agree with.
He was the 2C on a very good Colorado team, I think he’s fine in that role for us.
 

lilidk

Registered User
Mar 4, 2008
10,696
4,097
Top 2 lines and only Larkin plays physical game. Better move Tarasenko to third line and bring Kasper to play top 6 wing.
Not gonna happen 😭
 

Gniwder

Registered User
Oct 12, 2009
14,713
7,951
Bellingham, WA
He'll have higher points because again, he's being forced to play 2C and with really good linemates. However if we want to talk about skill level, I would say the majority of teams have a better 2C and some even a better 3C (Lowry, Lundell, Henrique, Haula)


"Good" 3C I'll agree with.

Compher's 48 points would have put him 63rd in points as a center on NHL.com, but they have a few players that played wing, not center. Statistically, he's a very bottom end 2C. Contenders usually have 1A/1B type centers.

Production goes down when wingers get stuck playing with Compher instead of DBoss, I'm not really sure how much Tank will produce with Compher as center.

What is the average points for a 2C?
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Realgud

OldnotDeadWings

Registered User
Sep 18, 2013
476
581
Just looking at points doesn't do Compher justice. He's a solid two-way player either at RW or C and is an adequate 2C at this point for the Wings. The suggestion he is only a 3rd/4th line player is nonsense. He wouldn't be on any team's 4th line. His last year in Colorado he was third among forwards in ES TOI. Better than anyone in that role for Detroit since Dats/Z and not much different overall than Filppula. The top six as indicated is the best in about a decade and still needs to get better.
 

dalem177

Plausible Keats
Oct 4, 2021
5,008
4,223
Minnesota
OK, normally I try to leave my questions til GDTs but...

Can someone HERE (i.e. not a copy-pasta from NHL.com) give me a quick explanation of the difference between wingers and center? I understand the positioning but hockey is so reactive I don't get the "he's the playmaker and they're the shooters" or whatever.

Thanks!
 

Gniwder

Registered User
Oct 12, 2009
14,713
7,951
Bellingham, WA
OK, normally I try to leave my questions til GDTs but...

Can someone HERE (i.e. not a copy-pasta from NHL.com) give me a quick explanation of the difference between wingers and center? I understand the positioning but hockey is so reactive I don't get the "he's the playmaker and they're the shooters" or whatever.

Thanks!

It's whatever they self identify as, the birth position doesn't matter. The NHL is very progressive.
 

RedHawkDown

still trying to trust the yzerplan
Aug 26, 2011
4,742
5,634
Canada
Tarasenko is more of a 3rd liner at this stage so I’m not sure it’s as good as people think. I don’t think he’s much of an upgrade on Perron. We also lost depth scoring in Sprong and Fabbri and replaced that with Berggren and Watson, so IMO the forwards are a wash compared to last season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ShanahanMan

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad