Rumor: Things Not Left Unsaid 3 - Flyers Rumors and Media Mentions: Never Ending Circles

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,080
22,238
I’m not sure I can recall an asset’s value ever cratering in half a season’s worth of games as much as Drysdale’s. Objectively, they valued him as equal to a ~top 10 pick. After 39 games, I’d be floored if they could flip Drysdale for more than a 3rd-4th rounder. They won’t because of those optics. They’ll let his value simply evaporate.

As for Jiricek, whom he won’t fetch, I always thought he was more of a modern defensive defenseman, with occasional flash. That’s worth exploring — oh, look, plausible fit at a time after draft day! — but cost dependent. It’s easy to see some other team having an outlier opinion.
Doubt Flyers valued Drysdale as a top 10 pick, Anaheim certainly didn't.

I'd say more like a high 2nd rd pick, which along with the pick included in the deal, would be somewhere around #20-25 in value, about the best they could expect for Gauthier under the circumstances.

And I doubt Gauthier was considered better than #10, coming out of a weak draft, demonstrating he wasn't NHL center material and receiving the kiss of death from Magua. :(
 

Magua

Entirely Palatable Product
Apr 25, 2016
38,683
161,147
Huron of the Lakes
Doubt Flyers valued Drysdale as a top 10 pick, Anaheim certainly didn't.

Anaheim didn’t? That’s not how it works. If a team calls the Flyers willing to trade a 15th overall pick for Frost, the Flyers are supposed to say what, “Sorry, we think he’s worth less”?

The Flyers were asking for a 5th overall pick from Montreal at the draft (to throw away on Reinbacher). That was their negotiating stance, and it’s not crazy. While I believe that’s a tad fanciful given how NHL teams have death grips on those picks, you’d need to believe Gauthier’s value went down significantly during his sophomore year. It did not. McGroarty was traded for a player selected at the same spot one year later (#14), so I think I’m being fair saying Gauthier’s value was ~top 10. You said his value was #20-25. That’s worthy of mockery. The Flyers absurdly overvalued Drysdale. That’s it; that’s the story.
 

FlyerNutter

In the forest, a man learns what it means to live
Jun 22, 2018
12,939
29,443
Winnipeg
It’s pretty funny we’ve heard nothing from the media sources about the asinine trade that brought in Drysdale.

Curious when that that tone shift happens, or is allowed. Pippin, and Jones love to control that narrative.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Beef Invictus

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,080
22,238
Anaheim didn’t? That’s not how it works. If a team calls the Flyers willing to trade a 15th overall pick for Frost, the Flyers are supposed to say what, “Sorry, we think he’s worth less”?

The Flyers were asking for a 5th overall pick from Montreal at the draft (to throw away on Reinbacher). That was their negotiating stance, and it’s not crazy. While I believe that’s a tad fanciful given how NHL teams have death grips on those picks, you’d need to believe Gauthier’s value went down significantly during his sophomore year. It did not. McGroarty was traded for a player selected at the same spot one year later (#14), so I think I’m being fair saying Gauthier’s value was ~top 10. You said his value was #20-25. That’s worthy of mockery. The Flyers absurdly overvalued Drysdale. That’s it; that’s the story.
And Montreal not only wasn't interested, their GM said Gauthier wasn't worth a #5, coming out of a weak draft. Obviously he's going to downrate him, but he also wanted the pick and didn't think Gauthier was close to even value. He didn't even bother to ask for a sweetener, just to see how much Briere really valued him.

McGroaty and the player he was traded for both seem to be discounted.
Why would the Pens make this trade unless they had second thoughts about Yager?
They knew more about their player than McGroaty.
Unless they thought McGroaty could help them win this season, which was very optimistic of them.
 

Magua

Entirely Palatable Product
Apr 25, 2016
38,683
161,147
Huron of the Lakes
And Montreal not only wasn't interested, their GM said Gauthier wasn't worth a #5, coming out of a weak draft. Obviously he's going to downrate him, but he also wanted the pick and didn't think Gauthier was close to even value. He didn't even bother to ask for a sweetener, just to see how much Briere really valued him.

McGroaty and the player he was traded for both seem to be discounted.
Why would the Pens make this trade unless they had second thoughts about Yager?
They knew more about their player than McGroaty.
Unless they thought McGroaty could help them win this season, which was very optimistic of them.

I don’t even believe you believe what you’re writing. There’s zero logic or consistency or factual evidence. It’s all just an argumentative reflex. I gave the one reply, but I’m not looking to mud wrestle.
 

GKJ

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
193,401
43,682
Frank mentioned Tortorella again today as someone who may not last the season, not necessarily being in danger, but they were buying or selling and over/under of 2.5 more coaching changes, but was kinda thrown out there as other situations to watch. He said how Brink, Frost, and Farabee were talked about last week on the pod, didn’t discuss them as a trade scenario, but included Foerster as ‘all struggling and all miserable’ and at some point that can’t be the on the players.
 

Adam Warlock

Registered User
Apr 15, 2006
7,051
6,963
I think Brink makes most sense to move. Hes never going to get a real chance at a top 6 player with Torts here and the wingers they have.

Adding Jiricek to the mix, youd have to think theyd be able to churn out a decent defense. Jiricek, Andrae, York, Drysdale, Bonk, Grans....decent crop of young dmen.

Frank mentioned Tortorella again today as someone who may not last the season, not necessarily being in danger, but they were buying or selling and over/under of 2.5 more coaching changes, but was kinda thrown out there as other situations to watch. He said how Brink, Frost, and Farabee were talked about last week on the pod, didn’t discuss them as a trade scenario, but included Foerster as ‘all struggling and all miserable’ and at some point that can’t be the on the players.

Which means wed get player friendly coach Ian Lapperiere.

Thats whats so depressing. Even without torts, we all know Lappy is the next coach. Id almost prefer Hakstol again.
 

Larry44

#FlyersPerpetualMediocrity
Mar 1, 2002
12,185
7,741
I think Brink makes most sense to move. Hes never going to get a real chance at a top 6 player with Torts here and the wingers they have.

Adding Jiricek to the mix, youd have to think theyd be able to churn out a decent defense. Jiricek, Andrae, York, Drysdale, Bonk, Grans....decent crop of young dmen.
Brink is becoming my favorite player. Smartest guy on the ice. Knows where to be, how to get the puck, what to do with it. Great hands. Improved his strength and speed. I want him to stay, which might be a curse...
 

GKJ

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
193,401
43,682
I think Brink makes most sense to move. Hes never going to get a real chance at a top 6 player with Torts here and the wingers they have.

Adding Jiricek to the mix, youd have to think theyd be able to churn out a decent defense. Jiricek, Andrae, York, Drysdale, Bonk, Grans....decent crop of young dmen.



Which means wed get player friendly coach Ian Lapperiere.

Thats whats so depressing. Even without torts, we all know Lappy is the next coach. Id almost prefer Hakstol again.
It would be Brad Shaw. They didn’t let Torts take games off to not have it be one of the guys who ran the bench in lieu of him.

Call me skeptical, I don’t think Lappy is in line there. Riley Armstrong is the brains down in Lehigh Valley, he is Danny’s guy.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Beef Invictus

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,504
171,237
Armored Train
And I know many are high on Shaw, but considering how it's commonly assumed that Tortorella is very checked out and he is doing a lot of the work...does that exactly fill us with confidence, based on what we see?

I do agree that Shaw gets a year or two. But with the way this team has been blatantly trying to groom and develop Lappy, it seems inevitable that he's going to appear again.
 

Sombastate

Registered User
Jun 19, 2011
10,806
9,024
Las Vegas
I said it in the off-season and i'll say it now:

Take the risk on Norris. I understand its a massive risk, but Norris could solve A LOT for this team if he's healthy and he appears to be.
 

Flyerfan4life

Registered User
Jun 9, 2010
35,645
22,459
Richmond BC, Canada
whoever comes next will be a 100% Torts yes man.. Torts from above will still run how the team plays.. he just wont be behind the bench or travelling as much..

your crazy if you think Torts wont have his fingers on his #cultureclub when hes shifted upstairs...
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Larry44

trostol

Learn to swim, Learn to swim
Jan 30, 2012
17,397
17,634
R'lyeh
same-as-it-ever-was.gif
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad