It's a long shot, but what would preclude the Rangers getting Callahan back at a lower price than what he asked for? Then what?
To be honest, I don't give McDonagh a letter.
Staal and G already have letters. They aren't getting them taken away.
Next is probably going to be a forward. If Richie isn't bought out, he's likely battling Staal for the C, but if not definitely retains in A.
If he is bought out, I'd give the A to Boyle, then Zucc, then MSL in that order.
It's a long shot, but what would preclude the Rangers getting Callahan back at a lower price than what he asked for? Then what?
We are three games from the stanley cup and people are still talking about bringing an overpaid RW back? Seriously?
This team is clearly close to contending this year (which I am shocked by). We have a hole on our top 6 LW (assuming Nash doesn't switch to his off-side) and we have and we have a clear hole at #1C. Both are incredibly more important to our future, sustained success, then bringing back Ryan ****ing Callahan to play on our 4th line.
I'd much rather leave Brian Boyle there at 2 million a year.
Bringing Callahan back is so laughable at this point. Why don't we just sign Gaborik for 8 million and go with:
Nash
St. Louis
Zuccarello
Gaborik
We are three games from the stanley cup and people are still talking about bringing an overpaid RW back? Seriously?
This team is clearly close to contending this year (which I am shocked by). We have a hole on our top 6 LW (assuming Nash doesn't switch to his off-side) and we have and we have a clear hole at #1C. Both are incredibly more important to our future, sustained success, then bringing back Ryan ****ing Callahan to play on our 4th line.
I'd much rather leave Brian Boyle there at 2 million a year.
Bringing Callahan back is so laughable at this point. Why don't we just sign Gaborik for 8 million and go with:
Nash
St. Louis
Zuccarello
Gaborik
“There hasn’t been much of a change at all in the dynamic,” Brad Richards, an alternate captain since joining the Rangers at the start of the 2011-12 season, told The Post on Tuesday.
“Off-ice, there are some [housekeeping] issues that we have to make sure are being taken care of, but as far as the team goes, we have enough guys here who are comfortable with taking a leadership role and understand what that means,” said No. 19.
Callahan was for the most part a lead-by-example captain rather than a master orator, so it’s not as if the Blueshirts must confront a void in their time of need.
“Things that have to be said will still get said,” Richards said. “I’m not taking anything away from Cally, but he was pretty young and not that vocal.
“It’s not like he was 38 and had been in the league for 18 years, so everybody was looking to him to listen to what he had to say,” Richards said of the 28-year-old Callahan, a seven-year veteran who was in his third season as captain. “We have other guys here who know what to say and when to say it.
“I don’t want to make it sound like we don’t miss him. What he did on the ice, you can’t replace. It’s just that nothing is really going to change in the way we approach things in the room.”
Richards is definitely the acting captain and is having a pretty good playoff year. Based on the comments when Callahan got traded, I'm wondering just how much Callahan did before in terms of being captain anyway.
It's a long shot, but what would preclude the Rangers getting Callahan back at a lower price than what he asked for? Then what?