The value of the multi-year tank is on display this SCF

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

yer leadin me astray
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
34,852
32,883
Lundell is one of their most important 5-7 players, and was drafted by the team.
No, he's really not. He's in the 9-11 range.

Barkov
Bennett
Tkachuk
Verhaege
Reinhart
Forsling
Montour
Bobrovsky

Are all very clearly ahead of him.
 

Spring in Fialta

A malign star kept him
Apr 1, 2007
26,470
15,668
Montreal, QC
What a stupid thread with a variety of poor examples from to OT as to what constitutes a tank, Tampa and Florida chief among them.

Even the Chicago Blackhawks were giving big money deals to the likes of Khabibulin and Aucoin in the midst of drafting Toews-Kane. Also dealt futures for Martin Havlat in that same timeframe.
 

heynowbababooey

Registered User
Sep 29, 2017
2,581
2,767
Contemporary Top 3 Picks for Each Team in the Finals:

Florida Panthers:

2010 - 3rd overall
2011 - 3rd overall
2013 - 2nd overall
2014 - 1st overall

4 Top Three picks in a five-year span

Edmonton Oilers:

2010 - 1st overall
2011 - 1st overall
2012 - 1st overall
2014 - 3rd overall
2015 - 1st overall

5 Top Three picks in a six-year span

The whole "tanking doesn't work!" argument always focuses on the unsuccessful rebuilds, but once again we see the familiar pattern in the Salary Cap era that this is the most reliable way to build a team with Stanley Cup aspirations.

Long-story short: if your team is no good, tank and tank hard, and don't be afraid to just keep on tanking if you don't have immediate results until you eventually do.
Is your name an NHL09 reference?
 

Czechboy

Češi do toho!
Apr 15, 2018
26,413
23,747
It's not just about repeated tanking (which Edmonton in particular has done) it's tanking in the right season for either a generational star or in Edmonton's case, the ability to draft one of the best players of all time.

Hard not to respect teams like Dallas that more or less build through good drafting and management. Obviously there are other teams who have done the same (Boston).

I think in Florida's case it was more the great trades in recent years that put them over the edge, not their picks from tanking years.
I agree with most this and they are both built and managed verybwell... But will point out Florida and Dallas are much bigger draws due to the weather and tax thing. They have an advantage in signing players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Adam da bomb

ClydeLee

Registered User
Mar 23, 2012
12,116
5,620
...this is a take....


Tank.. and maybe in 10 years you'll get to the SCF, maybe
Literally is, most teams who tank don't see success for 7 seasons. Like real success, winning a playoff round more than one time.

People were more prone to seeing the early post lockout Penguins/Hawks success as a model to follow. But those teams had assests building while they weren't tanking, they were just in cheap struggling ownership hell. A difference is they had lots of talent rising before they were bottom dwelling. They didn't trade off pieces to be bad, they were more bad while gaining talent/assests for the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Gr8 Dane

K1984

Registered User
Feb 7, 2008
14,974
16,178
Contemporary Top 3 Picks for Each Team in the Finals:

Florida Panthers:

2010 - 3rd overall
2011 - 3rd overall
2013 - 2nd overall
2014 - 1st overall

4 Top Three picks in a five-year span

Edmonton Oilers:

2010 - 1st overall
2011 - 1st overall
2012 - 1st overall
2014 - 3rd overall
2015 - 1st overall

5 Top Three picks in a six-year span

The whole "tanking doesn't work!" argument always focuses on the unsuccessful rebuilds, but once again we see the familiar pattern in the Salary Cap era that this is the most reliable way to build a team with Stanley Cup aspirations.

Long-story short: if your team is no good, tank and tank hard, and don't be afraid to just keep on tanking if you don't have immediate results until you eventually do.

It only works if the players you draft high are actually elite.

The Hall - RNH - Yakupov run was frankly shitty for the Oilers. One of them is a high end top line winger, but in a complimentary sense, one is a good top line winger, but not elite and almost never healthy, the other isn't an NHL player.

It only worked for the Oilers when they landed on players the quality of McDavid and Draisaitl. We could easily be sitting here singing a different tune if they drafted Bennett instead of Leon in 2014 and didn't win the lottery and drafted someone like Strome or Hanifin in 2015.
 
Last edited:

The Gr8 Dane

L'harceleur
Jan 19, 2018
12,621
24,704
Montreal
Everybody knows tanking works , whats new

...this is a take....


Tank.. and maybe in 10 years you'll get to the SCF, maybe
Look at everybody who won the cup recently aside from Boston and the Blues lol. This is exactly what they did.

It only works if the players you draft high are actually elite.

The Hall - RNH - Yakupov run was frankly shitty for the Oilers. One of them is a high end top line winger, but in a complimentary sense, one is a good top line winger, but not elite and almost never healthy, the other isn't an NHL player.

It only worked for the Oilers when they landed on players the quality of McDavid and Draisaitl. We could easily be sitting here singing a different tune if they drafted Bennett instead of Leon in 2014 and didn't sin the lottery and drafted someone like Strobe or Hanifin in 2015.
So you're basically saying that it worked. Lol
 

K1984

Registered User
Feb 7, 2008
14,974
16,178
Everybody knows tanking works , whats new


Look at everybody who won the cup recently aside from Boston and the Blues lol. This is exactly what they did.


So you're basically saying that it worked. Lol

Yes, but only due to what amounts to good fortune. Tanking and picking high is very far from a magic bullet solution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Gr8 Dane

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
28,244
10,875
Literally is, most teams who tank don't see success for 7 seasons. Like real success, winning a playoff round more than one time.

People were more prone to seeing the early post lockout Penguins/Hawks success as a model to follow. But those teams had assests building while they weren't tanking, they were just in cheap struggling ownership hell. A difference is they had lots of talent rising before they were bottom dwelling. They didn't trade off pieces to be bad, they were more bad while gaining talent/assests for the future.
And the GM at the time of the tank, how many were still around in the end? Neither Edm or Fla GM is still around from back then. Talon was GM til July 2009 before getting demoted. Patrick let go in 2006 after the team drafts their core of MAF, Malkin, Sid, and finished 2006 to draft Staal. ditto TB from their Stamkos and Hedman seasons.

Colorado, Sherman was GM from 2009 to 2014, so under his reign got Landy, Mack in the draft.

So, no payoff to be the GM of a tank job.... That's a reason GMs don't volunteer for a massive rebuild vs try to make what they currently have work. I think it's only Dean Lombardi in LA who endured the bad years and was around for the Cup. GM in April 2006, so he drafted Hickey, DD, Schenn in the top 6. But, made 2 monster deals to get Carter and Richards.

Being realistic, how many of Davidson, Grier, Verbeek will be around should/when Chicago, Anaheim, SJ turn it around?
 
Last edited:

paragon

Registered User
May 5, 2010
1,794
1,269
Drop Bennett over Lundell? Surely you jest.
Lundell takes a lot of faceoffs. Clear second in their team after Barkov. He leads his team in P/60 and he really stepped up after Bennett was injured. I think there is a good case for Lundell over Bennett in this playoff run.
 

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

yer leadin me astray
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
34,852
32,883
Lundell takes a lot of faceoffs. Clear second in their team after Barkov. He leads his team in P/60 and he really stepped up after Bennett was injured. I think there is a good case for Lundell over Bennett in this playoff run.
Bennett injured his hand, which is why he hasn't been taking faceoffs. He's been an absolute beast this playoff run, one of their most impactful players.
 

banks

Only got 3 of 16.
Aug 29, 2019
3,719
5,415
Contemporary Top 3 Picks for Each Team in the Finals:

Florida Panthers:

2010 - 3rd overall
2011 - 3rd overall
2013 - 2nd overall
2014 - 1st overall

4 Top Three picks in a five-year span

Edmonton Oilers:

2010 - 1st overall
2011 - 1st overall
2012 - 1st overall
2014 - 3rd overall
2015 - 1st overall

5 Top Three picks in a six-year span

The whole "tanking doesn't work!" argument always focuses on the unsuccessful rebuilds, but once again we see the familiar pattern in the Salary Cap era that this is the most reliable way to build a team with Stanley Cup aspirations.

Long-story short: if your team is no good, tank and tank hard, and don't be afraid to just keep on tanking if you don't have immediate results until you eventually do.

Are you really trying to claim that Edmonton's current Cup run is because of Adam Larsson and Nail Yakupov? Because that's what it looks like.

Get stuffed.
 

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
80,764
57,908
I can't tell if the purpose of this thread is a commentary on the 2010s Blackhawks or a wish for the 2030s Blackhawks.
 

Szechwan

Registered User
Sep 13, 2006
6,094
6,190
Edmonton Oilers:

2010 - 1st overall
2011 - 1st overall
2012 - 1st overall
2014 - 3rd overall
2015 - 1st overall

5 Top Three picks in a six-year span

The whole "tanking doesn't work!" argument always focuses on the unsuccessful rebuilds, but once again we see the familiar pattern in the Salary Cap era that this is the most reliable way to build a team with Stanley Cup aspirations.

Long-story short: if your team is no good, tank and tank hard, and don't be afraid to just keep on tanking if you don't have immediate results until you eventually do.
This doesn't do justice to the Oilers.

Edmonton 2007-2019

Four 1st overalls
One 3rd overall
One 4th overall
One 6th overall
One 7th overall
One 8th overall
Two 10th overalls
One 19th overall
Two 22nd overalls

That is a generational level of tanking (due to incompetence, mostly). If the Oilers manage to get through this era without a Cup it will be remarkable.


Credit to you @WarriorofTime for posting that elsewhere.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Higgens

PuckG

Registered User
Feb 26, 2015
4,310
6,110
Those three drafting years of Hall, Nuge and Yakupov really setting the stage for success, I guess.
 

Oak

Registered User
Apr 22, 2012
4,120
911
MA
Contemporary Top 3 Picks for Each Team in the Finals:

Florida Panthers:

2010 - 3rd overall
2011 - 3rd overall
2013 - 2nd overall
2014 - 1st overall

4 Top Three picks in a five-year span

Edmonton Oilers:

2010 - 1st overall
2011 - 1st overall
2012 - 1st overall
2014 - 3rd overall
2015 - 1st overall

5 Top Three picks in a six-year span

The whole "tanking doesn't work!" argument always focuses on the unsuccessful rebuilds, but once again we see the familiar pattern in the Salary Cap era that this is the most reliable way to build a team with Stanley Cup aspirations.

Long-story short: if your team is no good, tank and tank hard, and don't be afraid to just keep on tanking if you don't have immediate results until you eventually do.
So I guess Chicago is next?
 

rogking65

Registered User
May 13, 2016
543
411
Contemporary Top 3 Picks for Each Team in the Finals:

Florida Panthers:

2010 - 3rd overall
2011 - 3rd overall
2013 - 2nd overall
2014 - 1st overall

4 Top Three picks in a five-year span

Edmonton Oilers:

2010 - 1st overall
2011 - 1st overall
2012 - 1st overall
2014 - 3rd overall
2015 - 1st overall

5 Top Three picks in a six-year span

The whole "tanking doesn't work!" argument always focuses on the unsuccessful rebuilds, but once again we see the familiar pattern in the Salary Cap era that this is the most reliable way to build a team with Stanley Cup aspirations.

Long-story short: if your team is no good, tank and tank hard, and don't be afraid to just keep on tanking if you don't have immediate results until you eventually do.
explain how Taylor Hall and Yakupov are so important in this yrs cup run
 
  • Like
Reactions: nbwingsfan

nbwingsfan

Registered User
Dec 13, 2009
21,985
16,160
Contemporary Top 3 Picks for Each Team in the Finals:

Florida Panthers:

2010 - 3rd overall
2011 - 3rd overall
2013 - 2nd overall
2014 - 1st overall

4 Top Three picks in a five-year span

Edmonton Oilers:

2010 - 1st overall
2011 - 1st overall
2012 - 1st overall
2014 - 3rd overall
2015 - 1st overall

5 Top Three picks in a six-year span

The whole "tanking doesn't work!" argument always focuses on the unsuccessful rebuilds, but once again we see the familiar pattern in the Salary Cap era that this is the most reliable way to build a team with Stanley Cup aspirations.

Long-story short: if your team is no good, tank and tank hard, and don't be afraid to just keep on tanking if you don't have immediate results until you eventually do.
How many of their own 1st round picks has Vegas even kept in their system, never mind be contributors on their team?
 

StoveTopStauffer

Registered User
Apr 6, 2012
5,911
1,952
What a nothing burger of a thread. High draft picks have a high chance of impact, incredible insight. Tank if you need to.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad