For what it's worth, most of us suck at message-board shorthand. What sounds perfectly reasonable in our head comes across as a pissy manifesto to everyone reading it. It's been like that since the dawn of message boards. No reason for you to take a step back from it, unless this place causes you more stress than pleasure. Or unless you find what I haven't – a life.I've been a big argumentative jerk and will take a step back for the time being but what you say is really what rizzles my butt and makes me fire up my keyboard. I see such definitive statements that imply anyone who disagrees is simply wrong or a bad fan. It drives me nuts.
"Dach will go back to being awesome" -> (1) Dach was never Awesome in the NHL and (2) there is no guarantee he will return to any level. We simply don't know so there's nothing wrong with criticising his play and efforts when talking about the team today. (I'm glad he got the monkey off his back, the game is mental and he needs every advantage he can find and take)
"Hage will be awesome", "Demidov will make us forget all about Michkov", etc. -> Self-explanatory. Sometimes the honest optimism crosses over to emperor's new clothes style groupthink imo.
"Barron/Newhook/etc is still young" -> Implying all players improve all the time. Come on, how many times have we been left holding our peckers with prospects and young(ish) players? Why is it scepticism is so disturbing to some?
Between last year and this year, so far, we have not taken a step forward, much less two steps forward. But it's been difficult to accept for some.
This is what a rebuild looks like? Sure but at least admit that we've not taken any steps forward and critical players like Slafkovsky, Reinbacher, Dach, and Guhle are not where we wanted them to be this season. Simple as. It isn't damning them or the rebuild. But I find it so dishonest to claim everything is rosy and peachy when our critical rebuild players have taken a step back or stagnated and we're last in the division, last in the conference, and bottom5 in the league.
As far as the rebuild, I agree with most of what you're saying. We've got some exciting prospects, but I'm not falling for the hype that all of 'em will be upgrades on our current roster. I've seen that story too many times – future players always look brighter than present players. Some, like Demidov, may actually be as good as their hype. Most won't.
And yes, some of our current guys are underperforming or, in Reinbacher's case, on pause. Youth isn't an all-purpose excuse, but it is a mitigating factor. It's too early to write off Dach. Slafkovsky is a 20 year-old who has a lot of runway before hitting his prime. Guhle is developing, just needs experience. To be clear, these players were chosen as cornerstone pieces. We don't know how good they'll become, but we should agree on their importance to our future team. Easy to say we can pivot to Plan-B if they don't work out; much harder to actually find a comparable Plan-B.