I definitely get that. My medium-term optimism comes from the fact that the most significant long-term roster holes (save for 1RD if we set Reinbacher aside and avoid opening that can of worms) are lower in the lineup. I don't think Caufield/Suzuki/Slafkovsky is a dynamite first line, but I think Suzuki and Slafkovsky are enough that you can build around that duo with the knowledge that Demidov is on the way. We also have a lot of trade ammo to go after a guy like Rasmus Andersson to improve the right side. IMO Laine ends up on the first line by the end of the year, and I can see a world where Dach gets his timing back and a Caufield-Dach-Demidov 2nd line looks good for us as soon as next year. Similarly on D, I think Guhle and Hutson are going to bring enough ceiling as they develop that we can be fairly comfortable about filling in the rest of the group.
I just think there's a lot of low-hanging fruit left in terms of raising the floor, and management is currently deliberately postponing those options because we still have a few too many legacy contracts, and we're rightly still giving opportunities to young players. At some point the Barron/Xhekaj/Mailloux cohort will either need to learn to defend at the NHL level or we'll move on, and I'm not exactly concerned about being able to find replacement bottom pair D. Similarly either Newhook/Roy figure out how to be good 2nd line complementary scoring wingers or we move one or both of them to the third line and sign a UFA.
I agree that we weren't good in the last stages of the Weber/Price era despite the covid runs and we've been bad during the current rebuild, but if we didn't actually sell anything from the past core and turned Kotkaniemi/Sergachev into Dvorak and thin air that doesn't really help the current roster. Suzuki/Caufield and Dach from Romanov are nice pieces but that's not nearly enough, and Slafkovsky is still just 20 years old as the first major piece added during the current rebuild. We can't retroactively get trade returns for 2020 Weber, Danault, Tatar, Gallagher, and Price, and those missing returns and the missing core players from the 2010-18 drafts are what's holding us back right now. If we trade Suzuki and Caufield for picks and prospects I'd get the Sabres 2.0 comparisons but I don't think it makes much sense now.
Being frustrated that we haven't been good since a certain year doesn't magically convert Hutson/Guhle/Slaf from young players to their primes or get Demidov/Laine in the lineup. We have no inherited veteran core since we lost the entire last one in 2021 and the new "veteran core" was Hoffman, Savard, and Dvorak, the young players need to grow into their roles as the team's new core and that takes time.
Chicago is 2-2-1 with wins over a sleepwalking Edmonton team and San Jose. Of course they're better than last year but I think they're basically just equivalent to where we were in 23-24. Chicago also went from 68 to 59 to 52 points over the last 3 seasons, wouldn't that suggest that rebuilds don't have to be some smooth linear clockwork progression and that progression can be non-linear?
I think it's a pretty logical perspective on a roster with a single 25 year old core player and the rest of the core being 23 or younger with our best defencemen being 20 and 22, and our best prospect still in Russia for the year.