PPG means Points Per Game.It's not just unreasonable, it's idiotic.
Nail Yakupov has *never* had a 50 point season as a professional. Not in the NHL or the KHL.
Patrik Stefan has *never* had a 50 point season as a professional. Not in the NHL, the IHL, the AHL or the Swiss League.
Slafkovsky scored 50 points in the only complete NHL season he has played. Anybody "comparing" these players is completely clueless or has an obvious (and idiotic) agenda.
Don't feed the trolls.
All but one of the players in that list happened to start their NHL careers in their D+1 (first season after being drafted). So it made for a pretty easy apples-to-apples comparison. Wright is in his D+3 but this is his rookie season, so he doesn't fit in. Cooley is in his sophomore season.Where would Wright rank if he had been drafted 1OA?
I agree! Even posters can develop. He's only in his D+2 posting season.You could be a much better poster than you are.
Lecavalier started his career at the peak of the dead puck era too.Lecavlier was widely criticized in his 3rd season but he still scored 23 goals in 68 games - that's 28 over 82. Slaf is on pace to score 9 goals in 82 games and I'm honestly not sure he will hit that mark with how little he's shooting. Maybe if teams stop trying against us at the end of the season like they did last year, or if the Kazakh national team joins the NHL.
Vinny never lived up to the new Beliveau hype but there's no evidence right now that Slafkovsky belongs in the same conversation as him.
Can we say objectively he's better than Alexis Lafrenière? His projection was better for one half a season on an eliminated team, but Lafrenière, even if he's a disappointment, had a more straightforward evolution - I guess we will see if Slaf's fourth season in the league will compare.He's better than all of those players.
Yeah, important too - scoring is relatively higher these days, which is not a good sign.Lecavalier started his career at the peak of the dead puck era too.
Fair enough.Lecavlier was widely criticized in his 3rd season but he still scored 23 goals in 68 games - that's 28 over 82. Slaf is on pace to score 9 goals in 82 games and I'm honestly not sure he will hit that mark with how little he's shooting. Maybe if teams stop trying against us at the end of the season like they did last year, or if the Kazakh national team joins the NHL.
He's pacing for the same number of points and is more physical than Vinny was. He won't score as many goals over his career... I think everyone will agree. But it won't surprise me at all if he produces points at a similar pace and plays a tougher style of game. I think that's an achievable goal.Vinny never lived up to the new Beliveau hype but there's no evidence right now that Slafkovsky belongs in the same conversation as him.
It's not just unreasonable, it's idiotic.
Nail Yakupov has *never* had a 50 point season as a professional. Not in the NHL or the KHL.
Patrik Stefan has *never* had a 50 point season as a professional. Not in the NHL, the IHL, the AHL or the Swiss League.
Slafkovsky scored 50 points in the only complete NHL season he has played. Anybody "comparing" these players is completely clueless or has an obvious (and idiotic) agenda.
Don't feed the trolls.
cheers. There’s only so many times I can write Evans is rocking it in his thread for example… Also the reasons why are easy to identify as his game has not changed much he just added production and is at his prime at all he does.*The critics got quiet when he started to play well last year*
What did you expect? Most critics are not haters trolls.
The dead puck years were more in the mid 90s. It may not have been what it is today but in 2001 you had guys getting 120 points. So no, not really that important.Yeah, important too - scoring is relatively higher these days, which is not a good sign.
What 'ravenous lows'?cheers. There’s only so many times I can write Evans is rocking it in his thread for example… Also the reasons why are easy to identify as his game has not changed much he just added production and is at his prime at all he does.
This kid is 20, super inconsistent still with mountainous highs and ravenous lows and a big investment for the team so there’s obviously more to talk about and a spotlight. Also I think many are ready for a playoff push moreso than tank talk so immediate performance has weight.
Interesting guy to bring up. Everybody loves to love Lecavalier, but Lecavalier actually only hit PPG twice is his long career! He's a 0.78ppg guy. (And I'm a strong believer that St-Louis was the play driver on that live for a long time - Lecavalier's stats would be way lower without him).Slaf career path so far looks like a less skilled Lecavalier. Lecavalier had a rough 1st season and then did very well in his 2nd season before stuggling for part of his 3rd and even more so his 4th season (specially defensively). His 5th season this is where he spread its wings.
I've merged the two Slaf threads together as they've morphed into the same discussion about the player.
You are right in that the criticisms are so hyperbolic.What 'ravenous lows'?
I mean seriously man, he's a 20 year old developing player who's pacing for around 50 points. That's not horrible.
He needs to improve his game and pick up his intensity. Cool. Fair criticism. But people enjoy using words like 'catostrophic' when 'needs some improvement' will do.
I think getting repeatedly stripped of the puck from behind, turning over pucks and not scoring as a 1st liner and 1st wave pp is a very low low. Ravenous. His floor is obviously much higher than this.What 'ravenous lows'?
I mean seriously man, he's a 20 year old developing player who's pacing for around 50 points. That's not horrible.
He needs to improve his game and pick up his intensity. Cool. Fair criticism. But people enjoy using words like 'catostrophic' when 'needs some improvement' will do.
I don't know about reliable, but I'd say complimentary top 6, yes.At 20, he's already a reliable top 6 player. He's still learning.
I think you’re being hyperbolic. He’s nowhere near that bad.I think getting repeatedly stripped of the puck from behind, turning over pucks and not scoring as a 1st liner and 1st wave pp is a very low low. Ravenous. His floor is obviously much higher than this.
Nah.If anything Guy it is a positive comment I just made.
Given his play this year, I would say that is fair.I don't know about reliable, but I'd say complimentary top 6, yes.
How can his floor be higher than how he's playing? Makes no sense.I think getting repeatedly stripped of the puck from behind, turning over pucks and not scoring as a 1st liner and 1st wave pp is a very low low. Ravenous. His floor is obviously much higher than this.
Yeah, Slaf won’t hit Vinny’s peak. Forget the Richard and the top tens. Vinny spent most of his career in the top 30 and that’s where I think Slaf will be for much of his career.Interesting guy to bring up. Everybody loves to love Lecavalier, but Lecavalier actually only hit PPG twice is his long career! He's a 0.78ppg guy. (And I'm a strong believer that St-Louis was the play driver on that live for a long time - Lecavalier's stats would be way lower without him).
Salfkovsky can do that if well surrounded.
Christ I mean his average game. You are saying a guy’s floor is his worst games as a 20 year old?How can his floor be higher than how he's playing? Makes no sense.