Player Discussion The Slaf Thread - Parabolic Growth Edition

Spearmint Rhino

Registered User
Sep 17, 2013
9,334
9,355
We had one line going to start the year, to try and get Dach to wake the f*** up we broke that up and been a blender ever since. Put CC/Nuke/Slaf back together and leave them together. Leave Dach as the 4C to see if he can find his game against weaker comp or let him watch a couple from the press box.
 

Kents polished head

Formerly Tough Au Lit
Feb 4, 2013
9,708
4,731
Remember this summer when people suggesting it was a little early for the kind of contract he got were getting ridiculed in here for speaking their minds?

Good times.

I'm inclined to bridge Slaf for two or three years and take the chance we might be paying him more from ages 24-30/31.

I'm not crazy about the attitude I'm seeing at the WC. I'd like to see him focused on more growth and not assuming he has 'made it' now.

This guy was ridiculed at the time when he made this comment and I remember thinking something along the same lines in the WC. Looks like it was not ALL that idiotic of a take.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ReHabs

ReHabs

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2022
8,268
12,629
Remember this summer when people suggesting it was a little early for the kind of contract he got were getting ridiculed in here for speaking their minds?

Good times.



This guy was ridiculed at the time when he made this comment and I remember thinking something along the same lines in the WC. Looks like it was not ALL that idiotic of a take.
BaseballCoach is one of the most thoughtful and drama-free commentators here.

What funny is I was force-fed so much crow after Slaf's 50pt season that I haven't criticised his development ever since. Enjoying the show with a diet coke and popcorn now. I wish I could be enjoying his play on the ice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kobe Armstrong

Kobe Armstrong

Registered User
Jul 26, 2011
15,796
6,781
I am hard on Slaf but I think people that are complaining we should have drafted Cooley, should watch a lot more Cooley games. A small center that avoids contact and plays pass-first. He’s barely better than underachieving Slaf right now and would solve none of the team’s problem.
Having 2 top-6 centers would certainly help the team

Anyways I still support the Slaf selection, he just needs to perform much better no more excuses at this point
 

sampollock

Registered User
Jun 7, 2008
43,153
23,356
in my home
I am hard on Slaf but I think people that are complaining we should have drafted Cooley, should watch a lot more Cooley games. A small center that avoids contact and plays pass-first. He’s barely better than underachieving Slaf right now and would solve none of the team’s problem.
well true on that

but Slaf is big and not getting involved
 

Kennerback

Registered User
Jun 2, 2021
4,299
6,171
Having 2 top-6 centers would certainly help the team

Anyways I still support the Slaf selection, he just needs to perform much better no more excuses at this point
If Cooley is the BPA in 2022, it would confirm we had a stroke of incredible bad luck drafting #1. Small center who’s incessantly attempting zone entries dekes that worked vs College teams but will never work in the NHL. At least I have hope that Slaf can take it to the next level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ReHabs

Kobe Armstrong

Registered User
Jul 26, 2011
15,796
6,781
If Cooley is the BPA in 2022, it would confirm we had a stroke of incredible bad luck drafting #1. Small center who’s incessantly attempting zone entries dekes that worked vs College teams but will never work in the NHL. At least I have hope that Slaf can take it to the next level.
It's sports you have to make your own luck
 

McGuires Corndog

Pierre's favorite MONSTER performer
Sponsor
Feb 6, 2008
26,567
14,818
Montreal
I am hard on Slaf but I think people that are complaining we should have drafted Cooley, should watch a lot more Cooley games. A small center that avoids contact and plays pass-first. He’s barely better than underachieving Slaf right now and would solve none of the team’s problem.
Agreed, well said.

I wouldn’t even be surprised if Hage ends up being a more effective NHLer than Cooley.

It's sports you have to make your own luck

Slaf hasn’t been good but he also hasn’t been 100% healthy either IMO based on him missing games and seemingly unwilling to shoot. Something is a miss.

I’d still take Slaf over Cooley right now, potential is higher.
 

Habssince89

trolls to the IL
Sponsor
Apr 14, 2009
9,331
4,880
Vancouver, BC
Slaf's issue to me is between the ears. He possesses a high IQ and reads the game well, but I think he's trying to read the play too much and it causes him to not move his feet and get involved. I think he sees himself as a skill player (which he should) but he needs to understand that asserting himself physically to win the puck is how he will succeed. Once he has the puck, he's a good player. I think right now he's trying too hard to be cerebral.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tyson

Tyson

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
50,318
73,125
Texas
Slaf's issue to me is between the ears. He possesses a high IQ and reads the game well, but I think he's trying to read the play too much and it causes him to not move his feet and get involved. I think he sees himself as a skill player (which he should) but he needs to understand that asserting himself physically to win the puck is how he will succeed. Once he has the puck, he's a good player. I think right now he's trying too hard to be cerebral.
I wonder what he does in his spare time. Montreal night life for a rich kid has to be fun.
 

sampollock

Registered User
Jun 7, 2008
43,153
23,356
in my home
Slaf's issue to me is between the ears. He possesses a high IQ and reads the game well, but I think he's trying to read the play too much and it causes him to not move his feet and get involved. I think he sees himself as a skill player (which he should) but he needs to understand that asserting himself physically to win the puck is how he will succeed. Once he has the puck, he's a good player. I think right now he's trying too hard to be cerebral.
At draft , MTL brass said he was far advanced, due to playing with men and not boys.
so now what
 
  • Like
Reactions: ReHabs

the valiant effort

settle down, bud
Apr 17, 2017
4,907
5,955
I am hard on Slaf but I think people that are complaining we should have drafted Cooley, should watch a lot more Cooley games. A small center that avoids contact and plays pass-first. He’s barely better than underachieving Slaf right now and would solve none of the team’s problem.

Those folks barely watch hockey. They watch highlights, read stats, and type, type, type.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Gr8 Dane

ReHabs

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2022
8,268
12,629
Slaf hasn’t been good but he also hasn’t been 100% healthy either IMO based on him missing games and seemingly unwilling to shoot. Something is a miss.
Oh boy the mysterious injury that excuses everything thing comes out right on time.
I’d still take Slaf over Cooley right now, potential is higher.
From the draft to right this moment, surely Slaf is the more sexy pick with the more relevant upside. But as time goes on we’d better hope they don’t remain on their current respective trajectories.
 

KevSkillz4

Registered User
Apr 11, 2016
8,147
13,717
Anyway, I'm a big fan of Slaf and I believe that he will dominate in this league, but Slaf and Cooley are not even the best players from 2022 draft, it's....

Lane FREAKING Hutson !!!!!!!!
 

Frank Drebin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2004
35,651
23,413
Edmonton
Remember this summer when people suggesting it was a little early for the kind of contract he got were getting ridiculed in here for speaking their minds?

Good times.



This guy was ridiculed at the time when he made this comment and I remember thinking something along the same lines in the WC. Looks like it was not ALL that idiotic of a take.
Can you explain to me how a bridge contract makes sense?

We dont need the cap space now. We need it in years 3-8 of his contract. So we bridge him, save cap now when we don't need it, and if he is a superstar in 3 years we pay him 12-13 million per year?

Versus:

Paying extra now when we don't need it, and risking him becoming a mediocre top 6 player only worth 5-6 million in 2028?

To me, one of these options has a significantly higher cap risk than the other. Unless we think that Slaf is a junk asset not even worth hanging on to past RFA.
 

The Gr8 Dane

L'harceleur
Jan 19, 2018
13,782
27,378
Montréal
If he wasn't skating at 2 mph every night for the past month I think we could live with the lack of production and even goalscoring.


Safe to say our coach is a complete idiot and not helping though , plus ca change plus c'est pareil. Why are we playing our first overall who complements the top line well with scrubs lol , I get it for a game or two but his deployment recently is just bad for everybody involved
 
  • Like
Reactions: sampollock

Frank Drebin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2004
35,651
23,413
Edmonton
Logan Cooley at 1oa would have been a completely off the wall pick. Mckenzies list had 5 (first place votes) for slaf, 4 for wright and one for cooley.
 
Last edited:

sampollock

Registered User
Jun 7, 2008
43,153
23,356
in my home
If he wasn't skating at 2 mph every night for the past month I think we could live with the lack of production and even goalscoring.


Safe to say our coach is a complete idiot and not helping though , plus ca change plus c'est pareil. Why are we playing our first overall who complements the top line well with scrubs lol , I get it for a game or two but his deployment recently is just bad for everybody involved
that is what I worry about
not moving his feet, many posters say it and top announcers are saying it to
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad