Post-Game Talk: The Sieve We Know

Vasilevski is still 10000000x ahead and better than skinner ever will be and he has the accolades to prove it. Skinner can’t even outplay a 3rd string goalie in Pickard. And I thought Stauffer comparing Skinner to Rolison earlier was already a slap to the face to Roli. Skinner must be the next second coming of Brodeur and Hasek 2.0 then with you clown skinner supporters glazing his fat f***ing ass every time with the amount of gaslighting deflections.
I would rather have Vasi for 15 million over Skinner at league minimum.
 
Your English is atrocious. And I have no doubt it's your only language. I would almost think you're a parody account meant to mock Stu apologists, but three thousand plus posts suggest otherwise...

I'm going to guess you're one of three things: a bitter Calgary/Nuck fan who wants to troll us, a relative of Stu, or one of his stalkers.
One thing the pro stu crowd lack incredibly in is common sense.

Can’t believe I see somebody thinking Skinner >>> Vasilevski. Holy f***, dumbest take of the day
 
How is he like Roloson? He might get good at 32?
Honestly it's a smart thing to do for Stauffer to pump Skinner's tires. There's no sense in piling on him while there's no options. Even if we go with Pickard, Skinner would still be here and might have to play.

I hope Skinner heard it and gets inspired. He's played great games before so maybe he can deliver one or four
 
That is a cop out

What does Kevin Lankinen make? Pennies and he was available and still managed over 900 and Vancouver stunk it up. He stole a lot of games

I think Stolarz makes the same as Stuart and is 100x the goalie

Sam M looks wayyyyy better than Stuart and was making 1 mill and just signed an extension

Blackwood was making the same as Stuart and is 10000000x better

All we have to pray for is that our idiotic management knows that this turd is not part of any solution going forward

Players are allowed to outperform their contracts. Look at Perry. Here we just coddle Skinner. Never want to see him in an Oiler uniform again after the playoffs. Just like Larkins article says, it is russian roulette with this guy. Over 50% of the time, the turd lays an egg
Lankinen and Stolarz are hindsight, Habs aren't trading Sam M, I would have traded Skinner for Blackwood. Stu bucks, Bouch sucks too.

I'm not a Skinner fan, my daughter asked for his jersey this Xmas. I refused and she knows Santa isn't real now!! But this organization is not good for goalies, we commit to defense after a coaching change then back to fire wagons. More to this teams success than swapping out a goalie in my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Macheteops
Naw im just not emotionally stunted like most of you
Your take is incredibly stupid. Let's take last season, Oiler were a top 3 team in preventing high danger chances, top 2 team in rush chances, top 5 team in shots against. A team with better metrics that Tampa ever put together. The Oilers- were 2nd in the league in preventing rush chances- you know who allowed the most rush goals (odd or full)? Stuart. Stuart also had one of the worst goals saved above expected.

This season, the Oilers lead EVERY SINGLE WEEK in xG diffential (prior to 4 nations) and were a top 5 defensive team. The only reason the Oilers weren't first in the entire league was goaltending. Stuart was toiling at the bottom of list (using the average number of games played by a starter at that point in time) and in the 70's of all goalies.

There isn't a single f***ing metric that agrees with you.
 
Lankinen and Stolarz are hindsight, Habs aren't trading Sam M, I would have traded Skinner for Blackwood. Stu bucks, Bouch sucks too.

I'm not a Skinner fan, my daughter asked for his jersey this Xmas. I refused and she knows Santa isn't real now!! But this organization is not good for goalies, we commit to defense after a coaching change then back to fire wagons. More to this teams success than swapping out a goalie in my opinion.
It's a chicken and egg thing

Is it on the defense for the bad goalie numbers, or does the uncertainty in net make the team worse? It could be both, but maybe not

So why then, would we not try a cheaper option to test the theory even? Get a goalie with good numbers on a bad team like Reimer or Lyons or Talbot or whoever. If it's on the defense, even a little, then those goalies would come here and their numbers would tank. Lesson learned
 
Lankinen and Stolarz are hindsight, Habs aren't trading Sam M, I would have traded Skinner for Blackwood. Stu bucks, Bouch sucks too.

I'm not a Skinner fan, my daughter asked for his jersey this Xmas. I refused and she knows Santa isn't real now!! But this organization is not good for goalies, we commit to defense after a coaching change then back to fire wagons. More to this teams success than swapping out a goalie in my opinion.
I am just talking about how it is a cop out to excuse Skinners body of shit work b/c he makes 2+ million (which is not chump change)
 
  • Like
Reactions: TB12 and McAsuno
Yes, although that isn't the lesson here. The Leafs didn't have optimal goaltending so they tried different guys. If our management would have been running the Leafs they would have rode it out with Samsonov and Jones, because goalie talent isnt real. They are just a product of their defense, right?
But it kind of is. You have a goaltending department in Toronto that seems to get everything out of their goaltenders and the Oilers have Schwartz
 
  • Like
Reactions: McAsuno
Seeing Toronto and Colorado address their goaltending needs (Stolarz, Blackwood) while we sat on our ass infuriates me to no end. Go figure those 2 goalies are having a great playoffs so far.
Lol let's be real, neither of these guys have been world beaters EVER in there career. Makes you wonder what changed? Goalie coach? System? Something aligned that's for sure
 
I am just talking about how it is a cop out to excuse Skinners body of shit work b/c he makes 2+ million (which is not chump change)
I'm not intelligent enough to express that we need to commit to an upgrade in goal. They gave Campbell too much for too long and we are still paying for that error.

I don't want to defend Stu, he wasn't better than Campbell but was more sober so he go elevated too soon. I think he is too slow for the NHL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Macheteops
It's a chicken and egg thing

Is it on the defense for the bad goalie numbers, or does the uncertainty in net make the team worse? It could be both, but maybe not

So why then, would we not try a cheaper option to test the theory even? Get a goalie with good numbers on a bad team like Reimer or Lyons or Talbot or whoever. If it's on the defense, even a little, then those goalies would come here and their numbers would tank. Lesson learned
I was hoping for a change too but there no guarantee any those guys would have been better. We couldn't afford Ullmark.
 
I was hoping for a change too but there no guarantee any those guys would have been better. We couldn't afford Ullmark.
There was no guarantee with Stolarz, or Ullmark for that matter, when Boston got him from Buffalo. So keep rolling the dice until one hits.
 
Skinjob is official spokesman of pizza 73 and Bob loves pizza
Shitty meme job for a shitty goalie.

9rn308.jpg
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad