The Sens are 4th in the league in WAR lost due to injuries.

Tanknation

Registered User
Feb 24, 2012
3,256
3,749

Technically if you take away Ellis ltiretirement injury, Sens would actually be third in the league in WAR lost behind Colorado and Vegas (Which shows how terrifying both of those teams are fully healthy).

Canadiens suffered the most injuries overall, however many of their injured players were a net negative to begin with.

This actually gives me some hope for the senators next season if rhey can get a better coach and a healthier roster.
I guess Montréal's top goal scorer was a net negative along with their best young D stud, along with their number 1 D for significant time, a top 3C as well. Very Odd take as the list goes on.
 

Bjornar Moxnes

Registered User
Oct 16, 2016
12,306
4,814
Troms og Finnmark
Caufield, Ghule, Monhanan, Matheson etc were severely outplayed by who exactly?
Not saying all were outplayed. Losing Caufield did hurt. However, Xhekaj, Slafkovsky, etc. all had a negative WAR, meaning their injuries actually lead to a player taking their place doing better than them for the team victories.
 

Tanknation

Registered User
Feb 24, 2012
3,256
3,749
Not saying all were outplayed. Losing Caufield did hurt. However, Xhekaj, Slafkovsky, etc. all had a negative WAR, meaning their injuries actually lead to a player taking their place doing better than them for the team victories.
No, no they actually didn't. XHEKAJ made the team out of training camp and got injured as well. SLaf too out of camp and was not very good. So no idea what you are tlaking about
 

NyQuil

Big F$&*in Q
Jan 5, 2005
99,180
65,512
Ottawa, ON
Not saying all were outplayed. Losing Caufield did hurt. However, Xhekaj, Slafkovsky, etc. all had a negative WAR, meaning their injuries actually lead to a player taking their place doing better than them for the team victories.

All it means is that they performed worse than a "replacement level player" would have statistically, not that their actual replacements were better.

The output is an estimate of how many more games a player’s team won than they would have if they had instead played a “replacement level” player in those minutes. A replacement-level player is a fringe 13th forward or 7th defenceman, the kind of depth player that teams could easily acquire for almost nothing.

 
  • Like
Reactions: TheOrangeDesk

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
26,353
13,661
do not get this thread. Only Chabot was a core player who missed key time. 5 players have played in 81 games. Sens just did not have good depth. The Sens are like the oilers of a short time ago. 6 good players and the rest scrubs. Chych does not count--he was late to the show
Ever heard of their number 1 goal scorer from last year, he’s played about 6 games.
Zub, Talbot , Forsberg.
The chart shows how they’ve been hurt.
 

Dubi Doo

Registered User
Aug 27, 2008
20,346
14,286
OP may have had good intentions, but this thread will just make Ottawa a punching bag for posters.

To be honest, injuries likely kept them from reaching their full potential.
 

WarriorofTime

Registered User
Jul 3, 2010
31,563
20,659
I'm not sure if Formenton is included in the statistic as he's not injured, but yes, he is also not in the line-up unexpectedly.
He’s not under contract with speculation that he was the ring leader of the Canada Juniors alleged gang rape. So it’s unlikely he plays for Ottawa for a while, if ever.
 

Tanknation

Registered User
Feb 24, 2012
3,256
3,749
Caufield scored 26 goals, Norris 2
26 > 2
Norris 2 26? Huh. Habs had way more injuries and impacted players. Just no idea what the argument was even. Beyond ridiculous what poster said about players that were injured were net negative
 

AvalancheRy

Registered User
Feb 13, 2009
1,093
404
Seems to me the more interesting topic is Vegas or Colorado playing so well despite being injured so much. Vegas is going to be incredibly scary if Stone comes back healthy.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad