The Crypto Guy
Registered User
- Jun 26, 2017
- 29,217
- 38,901
I was going to ask when Kakko's plays next not realizing it was literally right what I quoting from youNow I'm curious.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/495f1/495f185fc1f2d2bd459ec9ded3ca2eb67b513d95" alt="laugh :laugh: :laugh:"
I was going to ask when Kakko's plays next not realizing it was literally right what I quoting from youNow I'm curious.
Yeah, kind of like Kakko, Kravtsov, Andersson, Lettieri are all hockey players.Carslberg, Heineken, Foster, Budweiser... It's all the same generic ****
And Fosters is like Gods' nectar compared to that B-shit @Amazing Kreiderman put on his list - hopefully he's back on his meds. : )Come on man don't compare Fosters to Heineken and Carlsberg. I'd rather drink my own urine than drink Fosters.
^ this would be even better.That's it, from now on I'm reporting every bull**** post about the Rangers
I can't believe we are still having this conversation. Now people are just bringing it up for attention. THEY ARE NOT GOING TO GO OFF THE BOARD. When you hear them talk about lists they've had, they ALWAYS have the top guys at the top. Their lists only start to deviate once they get down to the place that we usually draft at. They were going to draft Petterson in 2017 if he was there instead of Lias. They were going to draft Keller if the trade with Edmonton went down (Not Puljujaarvi who Edmonton went with). They are going to draft Kakko.
Yes.Has kakko been playing in pre world champ friendlies for finland?
Bob is correct far more often than he's wrong, and he has constantly NAILED our selection prior to making it. He absolutely has the Rangers FO as one of his "scouts." So, with all due respect, I think you're absolutely wrong in thinking that what Bob says about our draft plans is meaningless and without sources.I get the absurdity of the notion that the Rangers might go off the board at #2, it’s really unlikely, and I don’t think there’s any chance it happens (as much as I don’t trust Gordie Clark).
But please stop using the logic of “Bob said we’re picking Kakko!!”.
The guy isn’t the three eyed raven. One speculative post by one of our posters that he gets info from someone inside the Rangers organization (as true as it may be) isn’t enough grounds to take everything Bob says as gospel. He’s an analyst with some inside info - that doesn’t mean he’s spot on with everything.
Kakko got a nice assist today in the game tying goal.
Only people talking about going off the board are either trolls, people seeking attention, or are irrational in their logic. When Quinn hints at taking Kakko, Bob says we're taking Kakko, and all the logic in the world dictates as such, it makes the outcome quite obvious.So... when the Devils take Hughes and we follow up with Kakko, we won't have to hear anymore insanity about going off the board when there's a potential franchise player available, or how we should have taken one kid over the other?
Right? Please, Mother of all Things Holy, tell me that I'm right.
If you genuinely don't think that the Rangers want to take the best prospect we may have ever drafted, then at least talk about the possibility of trading down out of the top two. Still nonsense to me, but at least it's grounded in reality.
So... when the Devils take Hughes and we follow up with Kakko, we won't have to hear anymore insanity about going off the board when there's a potential franchise player available, or how we should have taken one kid over the other?
Right? Please, Mother of all Things Holy, tell me that I'm right.
If you genuinely don't think that the Rangers want to take the best prospect we may have ever drafted, then at least talk about the possibility of trading down out of the top two. Still nonsense to me, but at least it's grounded in reality.
you want off the board? the rangers will walk up to that podium this year and draft lafreniere 2nd overall in 2019......its happening
I literally LOL'd.
Only people talking about going off the board are either trolls, people seeking attention, or are irrational in their logic. When Quinn hints at taking Kakko, Bob says we're taking Kakko, and all the logic in the world dictates as such, it makes the outcome quite obvious.
OMG, please, enough of this. We have explained to you several times how wrong you are outside one particular situation under a completely different management team and situation almost 10 years ago.No. Not true at all. If anything the Rangers have been against the grain when it comes to the draft. Hughes is going 1 no doubt. He will be a scoring machine the moment he enters the NHL Can you say the same about Kakko? Team USA is loaded. If the Avs offered 4 and 14 for 2 I would listen.
I'm convinced more than ever he's just a troll.I’m sure you would.
The Rangers won’t