I don't understand your response. I was using Pettersson and Zegras as examples of the difficulty of acquiring impact centers, which was based on your previous post.I don't even want Petterson or Zegras. We don't have the cap space. I want Nic Paul or Nic Roy or someone like that, who is complimentary and not redundant.
The focus should be on building a team, not collecting the most one-way skill. Haven't we learned that a million times over the past decade?
When I say "impact C" I meant someone who fills a desperately needed role on the Sabres. A matchup center who shuts down top lines. Highly paid 1Cs are not what I was talking about.I don't understand your response. I was using Pettersson and Zegras as examples of the difficulty of acquiring impact centers, which was based on your previous post.
Wanting a 3/4C as opposed to a player like Tkachuk seems silly to me. I'm advocating for a Tkachuk trade precisely because that's a team building move. There's nearly no one on the roster who plays his game.
And, neither move is mutually exclusive. You can do both.
Big if true..
100%I don't even want Petterson or Zegras. We don't have the cap space. I want Nic Paul or Nic Roy or someone like that, who is complimentary and not redundant.
The focus should be on building a team, not collecting the most one-way skill. Haven't we learned that a million times over the past decade?
When I say "impact C" I meant someone who fills a desperately needed role on the Sabres. A matchup center who shuts down top lines. Highly paid 1Cs are not what I was talking about.
If we bring on Tkachuk with the cap hit and assets that it will cost, it will severely limit our ability to bring on the shut down center that we desperately need. And will once again waste all of that talent on this team because the role players all stink.
Again, that much-needed 3C is the engine of the team and Tkachuk is a luxury. Investing in that engine is the best approach for next season. I think you'll find that once we acquire that engine, along with the other role players, that Tkachuk doesn't fit, cap-wise or asset-wise.
I usually agree with pretty much everything you say but this response says the Sabres have no high end talent and we need to go outside the organization.I don't understand your response. I was using Pettersson and Zegras as examples of the difficulty of acquiring impact centers, which was based on your previous post.
Wanting a 3/4C as opposed to a player like Tkachuk seems silly to me. I'm advocating for a Tkachuk trade precisely because that's a team building move. There's nearly no one on the roster who plays his game.
And, neither move is mutually exclusive. You can do both.
I agree that the Sabres need that 3C defensive/checking center. But I don't think any of this is mutually exclusive. Unless you're trying to trade for a Michael Peca style 3C (I don't even know if that class of checking center even exists anymore), you can still add a high end player in addition to that 3C.When I say "impact C" I meant someone who fills a desperately needed role on the Sabres. A matchup center who shuts down top lines. Highly paid 1Cs are not what I was talking about.
If we bring on Tkachuk with the cap hit and assets that it will cost, it will severely limit our ability to bring on the shut down center that we desperately need. And will once again waste all of that talent on this team because the role players all stink.
Again, that much-needed 3C is the engine of the team and Tkachuk is a luxury. Investing in that engine is the best approach for next season. I think you'll find that once we acquire that engine, along with the other role players, that Tkachuk doesn't fit, cap-wise or asset-wise.
On the other hand, if you're talking about trading JJP AND Quinn, and think one of them can be replaced by Kulich or Savoie (I'm not sure they can), then that's something that might work. But it comes with a ton of risk, after developing those two guys for so long.
I don't think that at all. I think Thompson, Dahlin, Power, etc. are all high-end talents.I usually agree with pretty much everything you say but this response says the Sabres have no high end talent and we need to go outside the organization.
I don’t believe that.
JJ at 22 almost hit 30
Quinn is elite
Benson has talent
Tage is a twice ppg player
The Sabres have talent, they lack any type of QUALITY role players and grit, and most of the prospects are redundant. A couple days ago I suggested three players that are at least listed as centers….Bennett, Sturm and Thedoak’s idea of Iaffalo. Two of these players can play up and down the lineup, and Sturm to me is our 4th line center.
The last few years have been about drafting and developing…..it’s not time to go “Murray” on the team.
Bennett - I’ll switch firsts with Florida, and add something else to work it out.
Iaffalo - something around Krebs and a pick
Sturm - I can’t believe a 2nd wouldn’t get him.
Overpayments???? Maybe but these 3, along with at least 1 other “Carrier” type would completely change our team without gutting if for Tytchuk.
This is exactly my feelings as well. We don't need to make all kinds of moves and trade away prospects/young NHLers. Keep Kulich/Savoe/Ostlund as they all have some elite traits. Let them fight for possibly 1 spot or for injury call-ups. It doesn't hurt at all to have them all in Rochester to start the season.I usually agree with pretty much everything you say but this response says the Sabres have no high end talent and we need to go outside the organization.
I don’t believe that.
JJ at 22 almost hit 30
Quinn is elite
Benson has talent
Tage is a twice ppg player
The Sabres have talent, they lack any type of QUALITY role players and grit, and most of the prospects are redundant. A couple days ago I suggested three players that are at least listed as centers….Bennett, Sturm and Thedoak’s idea of Iaffalo. Two of these players can play up and down the lineup, and Sturm to me is our 4th line center.
The last few years have been about drafting and developing…..it’s not time to go “Murray” on the team.
Bennett - I’ll switch firsts with Florida, and add something else to work it out.
Iaffalo - something around Krebs and a pick
Sturm - I can’t believe a 2nd wouldn’t get him.
Overpayments???? Maybe but these 3, along with at least 1 other “Carrier” type would completely change our team without gutting if for Tytchuk.
Exactly. We're closer to being great than it might seem, we only need to fill-in the blanks with a Hecht, a Grier, and a Lydman. Couldn't have said it better myself. If we can do that, we have as much promise as any team in the league. And Hechts, Griers, and Lydmans don't require once-in-a-generation-type fantasy trades like other names being tossed around.This is exactly my feelings as well. We don't need to make all kinds of moves and trade away prospects/young NHLers. Keep Kulich/Savoe/Ostlund as they all have some elite traits. Let them fight for possibly 1 spot or for injury call-ups. It doesn't hurt at all to have them all in Rochester to start the season.
2/3 Free agents, (Trenin, Carrier, vet RHD)
1/2 minor trades (Krebs, Joker, prospect/pick--> Bennett/Iafallo/Sturm/Colton
We need some vets that are consistent and can play a two way game up and down the lineup and some special teams. Your Hechts, Griers, Gionta's, and maybe a RHD like Lydman.
I think Quinn is ready to pop big time. He should be in the slot on PP1 and if PP1 rebounds next year which it should. He might be a PPG player. Doesnt matter if he plays with TT or Cozens.
I'm not sure dropping three spots gets you that much. But I like the idea. I can see Adams going after Sturm if he's good at faceoffs.Here's a thought --
San Jose gets 11OA.
Buffalo gets 14OA(Pittsburgh), 85OA (Tampa) and Nico Sturm.
San Jose concentrates talent. Buffalo adds depth and another trade piece.
Depends on the draft board, of course.
EDIT: I would like to see them pick Cole Beaudoin. Chances are he'd still be there around 20, so a trade back for something of value makes sense to me.
That team doesn't make the playoffs, and also has cap issues the following year when you have to pay Levi and Quinn.I did a capfriendly roster just so we could see what the Sabres would look like with a Tkachuk trade. I went high end on the Sabres own RFAs on purpose. $87.5M cap.
- The Tkachuk trade I've posted is what I used: Kulich, Peterka, Jokiharju, 2024 1st
- UPL 5 x $6M.
- Krebs 1 x $1.2M
LW: Tkachuk, Skinner, Benson
C: Thompson, Cozens, Krebs
RW: Tuch, Quinn, Greenway
LD: Power, Byram, Johnson
RD: Dahlin, Samuelsson, Clifton
G: UPL
That's 16 players with $7.5M left over. Adding in the expected ELCs: Levi, Savoie, Rousek. That leaves ~$5M for 4 players. I saw a trade for Nico Sturm. He's a $2M player, so a trade for him plus 3 league minimum level players gets the Sabres to where they would need to be. The 3 league minimum level players would be the 7th D and 13th and 14th forward, which is fine.
The anchor is Skinner, but the roster would be doable. Here's a possible opening night line-up.
Tkachuk - Thompson - Tuch
Quinn - Cozens - Benson
Greenway - Krebs - Skinner
Rousek - Sturm - Savoie
xxx, xxx
Power - Dahlin
Byram - Samuelsson
Johnson - Clifton
xxx
UPL, Levi
I think that's a good line-up with the addition of Tkachuk and Sturm, plus Ruff's coaching.
Sounds just like an Adams target lol. Plus, he's good at faceoffs, which is the main trait Adams spoke about.Just to add - Sturm is a bit slow and he's very passive. If they want more identity type guys... I don't see the fit.
Sturm's scoring was negligible this year, so I'm not pegging him as worth more that a fourth. I know that's not his main contribution, but still. That's not enough to move up three places in mid-round one. Tampa's 3rd still leaves it a little light, but eggs/omelettes.I'm not sure dropping three spots gets you that much. But I like the idea. I can see Adams going after Sturm if he's good at faceoffs.
This is all conjecture based on what you want out of a bottom 6. You want a Vegas bottom 6 but that requires a pretty big change. There's no way the Sabres are making that change in one season.That team doesn't make the playoffs, and also has cap issues the following year when you have to pay Levi and Quinn.
There is no way to add Tkachuk that doesn't both make the team worse overall (your bottom 6 is the worst ever assembled with two small rookies, Krebs, and Skinner), and also get you into cap trouble.
Sounds just like an Adams target lol. Plus, he's good at faceoffs, which is the main trait Adams spoke about.
That team doesn't make the playoffs, and also has cap issues the following year when you have to pay Levi and Quinn.
There is no way to add Tkachuk that doesn't both make the team worse overall (your bottom 6 is the worst ever assembled with two small rookies, Krebs, and Skinner), and also get you into cap trouble.
Sounds just like an Adams target lol. Plus, he's good at faceoffs, which is the main trait Adams spoke about.
You must change your name if you're talking about trading JJ.I did a capfriendly roster just so we could see what the Sabres would look like with a Tkachuk trade. I went high end on the Sabres own RFAs on purpose. $87.5M cap.
- The Tkachuk trade I've posted is what I used: Kulich, Peterka, Jokiharju, 2024 1st
- UPL 5 x $6M.
- Krebs 1 x $1.2M
LW: Tkachuk, Skinner, Benson
C: Thompson, Cozens, Krebs
RW: Tuch, Quinn, Greenway
LD: Power, Byram, Johnson
RD: Dahlin, Samuelsson, Clifton
G: UPL
That's 16 players with $7.5M left over. Adding in the expected ELCs: Levi, Savoie, Rousek. That leaves ~$5M for 4 players. I saw a trade for Nico Sturm. He's a $2M player, so a trade for him plus 3 league minimum level players gets the Sabres to where they would need to be. The 3 league minimum level players would be the 7th D and 13th and 14th forward, which is fine.
The anchor is Skinner, but the roster would be doable. Here's a possible opening night line-up.
Tkachuk - Thompson - Tuch
Quinn - Cozens - Benson
Greenway - Krebs - Skinner
Rousek - Sturm - Savoie
xxx, xxx
Power - Dahlin
Byram - Samuelsson
Johnson - Clifton
xxx
UPL, Levi
I think that's a good line-up with the addition of Tkachuk and Sturm, plus Ruff's coaching.
How piss poor depressing does that sound? You add a guy like Tkachuk to the lineup, end up with cap problems, and still no confidence they actually simply make the playoffs, which is half the league.
Right or Wrong, who knows. But the thought of that makes me think a shakeup is needed on the roster, and not just a 3C being brought in on a slight overpay.
This is all conjecture based on what you want out of a bottom 6. You want a Vegas bottom 6 but that requires a pretty big change. There's no way the Sabres are making that change in one season.
Also, Ruff has had an offensive third line. I don't think he's going to advocate for a huge change. Maybe a 4C or a grinder.
Top 6 winger: agree. That winger needs to be a net front type of playerI think you need a 3C, a 2LW, a 4RW, and mid-pairing RHD. 4 players. Basically the exact same offseason Vancouver had last year.
It's not the major roster surgery you're making it out to be -- in fact, we don't have to lose a single player under contract.
Very possible, and even easier for Buffalo, having more assets and cap space than Vancouver did.