Zegras is an interesting candidate. I have a hard time convincing myself he'd be a good fit, but if he's the top-6 add + they retool the bottom 6, then I'm fine with the acquisition. Again, it's not really about one move- it's about Adams overall vision for this offseason.
But man, Id much rather they ante up and try to pry a player like Crouse away from Utah. Of course, Zegras seems to be available while I doubt Crouse is.
I also wonder if it'd be wiser to save some of those assets and trade for a less expensive top-9 winger who goes to the hard areas and can be the worker bee on a top-6 line.
The reason I like Zegras is that he's creative. The Sabres have a lot of "trying to do too much" types but I don't see a lot of elite vision paired with high level skill. Quinn?
Savoie and Ostlund project well in these areas. But Zegras is there now. He just doesn't play the old school way.
I'd love to have his speed, skill, vision, and creativity in the lineup. Of course, Adams would need to add more grit. But moves can't be looked at in isolation when talking team building.
If you think buying out Skinner is a good idea, I have no idea why you would think that trading for Zegras is also a good idea.
If we're talking defensive effort, sure. But offensively and in transition, they are two very different players.
The only player you even targeted worth looking at is Tkachuk
Zegras is a major no
Necas is just going to get overpaid for mediocre stats
Kotkaniemi brings me less than zero joy
Lastly, dealing away Peterka is a net negative in terms of offense
Whoooooooosh! That was the point going past you. The point was to show that a team can improve in the present and future at the same time.
He also did absolutely nothing as they circled the drain his last year here. Everyone seems to ignore it when they make him out to be a carefree clueless idiot who traded his cows for magic beans. He got fired after a season where he made no moves and let them drown. And it isn’t even why he got fired. He got fired because Terry didn’t feel in the loop enough.
Also most of those beans sprouted Cup rings.
This is true, but the room was so toxic that I'm not sure reinforcements would've mattered. It's been talked about to great length, but adding Kane, Bogosian, and Lehner to a room where you are trying to build a solid culture for the young guns (Eichel, Reinhart) was the highway to hell. That Sabres locker room was the opposite of what Bill Zito and Paul Maurice described last night.
The morale of the story is you have to draft well, add good players of character through trades and free agency, and build a positive culture. You don’t bring Kane, Bogosian, and Lehrer into your room.
I really like McGroarty, he's the type of player we would probably look for. The problem is he wants to play in the NHL next season, so he needs guarantees. I wouldn't be surprised if Boston or Washington made a move for him and he played in the NHL next season and thrived.
Power forward game, skates ok, will give everything he has to win. Net front guy.
I liked McGroarty too…but in no way would I have drafted him over Savoie. In no way would I trade Savoie for him now either.
This isn’t a particularly close call either.
Buffalo shouldn’t trade Savoie, Ostlund, or Kulich for him.