syz
[1, 5, 6, 14]
- Jul 13, 2007
- 29,828
- 19,713
Thanks, the paneling definitely helps fit the retro gaming vibe.Dig the authentic wood paneling.
No SNES?
If you had told me this photo was actually taken pre-2010, I'd have believed you. Nice setup. Have fun!The Sega and Nintendo have been sitting in storage bins for years, I’m so glad to finally have them displayed and working.
Are we at the point where PS3 is retro? I guess so... Man I feel old lol.View attachment 968530
Finally acquired a CRT and got my retro game systems set up in the man cave after about a year of being in the new house.
The Sega and Nintendo have been sitting in storage bins for years, I’m so glad to finally have them displayed and working.
I had to get an RFU adapter for the PS2, as the CRT I have doesn’t have A/V hookups, so I run it through the Coax port. Works like a charm.
That is a compliment of the highest order, man. Thank you much.If you had told me this photo was actually taken pre-2010, I'd have believed you. Nice setup. Have fun!
I suppose so.... the release of the original ps3 was almost 20 years ago now! god I hate that lol.Are we at the point where PS3 is retro? I guess so... Man I feel old lol.
Great setup though!
'Retro' should be as much style/substance as just calendar years, especially considering with video games compared to the earlier days of rapid progress things hardly change anymore. I mean the PS3 plays Skyrim.I suppose so.... the release of the original ps3 was almost 20 years ago now! god I hate that lol.
Thank you for the compliment though!
I can agree with you on the ps3... It's certainly on the border of "Retro", at best. Even some of the launch titles had decent graphics and a fairly modern feel. It plays GTA 5 as well without many technical differences to the current version.'Retro' should be as much style/substance as just calendar years, especially considering with video games compared to the earlier days of rapid progress things hardly change anymore. I mean the PS3 plays Skyrim.
My own personal take but I'd go back one more generation and say anything PS1/N64 and before is 'retro', PS2/XBox and after is 'modern'. Though I understand if others want to shift that one to the right.
I'm not sure I can quite get on board with that. I personally would consider the 6th generation pre-HD era to be considered 'retro' by now, in my own opinion.I think the Dreamcast is the beginning of "modern". Came with a modem and Soul Calibur still looks good 25+ years later. So since it came out after Dreamcast, I would consider PS2 "modern" as well. The jump between the 3d trailblazers in PS1/N64 to PS2/DC is significant.
I agree with this - the cutoff for me is right when the home consoles started outperforming the arcades, and the Dreamcast was the star pupil in that regard.I think the Dreamcast is the beginning of "modern". Came with a modem and Soul Calibur still looks good 25+ years later. So since it came out after Dreamcast, I would consider PS2 "modern" as well. The jump between the 3d trailblazers in PS1/N64 to PS2/DC is significant.
That's a fair assessment. I'd point out that the PS2/GC/XBOX all had component video out, which really looked phenomenal for the time, if you had the right tv.I can agree with you on the ps3... It's certainly on the border of "Retro", at best. Even some of the launch titles had decent graphics and a fairly modern feel. It plays GTA 5 as well without many technical differences to the current version.
I'm not sure I'd consider PS2 to be "modern" however. It didn't even have an HDMI port and there's a pretty stark difference between the look and feel of a PS2 game compared to PS3 and beyond.
Awesome man! looks like a good time!I modded into a MAME machine with a 19" monitor I designed, and 3D printed a panel for. It's a fun machine.
That's awesome. Need more pictures!I modded into a MAME machine with a 19" monitor I designed, and 3D printed a panel for. It's a fun machine.
Right but so many of the same games were released for N64 and Dreamcast. Tony Hawk, Rayman 2, Shadowman, Hydro Thunder were all released on both N64 and Dreamcast around the same time so it feels weird to say one console is retro and one isn’t. The Dreamcast was sort of a bridge between console generations.I agree with this - the cutoff for me is right when the home consoles started outperforming the arcades, and the Dreamcast was the star pupil in that regard.
Graphics-wise, the N64 and PS1 were understandably rough, 3D-wise, but everything DC-forward could really look fantastic.
The DVD/GD/mini-DVD format provided better read rates, and you didn't have to choose between rough textures (N64) or long load times (PS1).
Online didn't get big until XBOX, and didn't get good until 360, imo. Not a good indicator of retro vs. modern for me.
The difference in performance between that wheezing, gasping, 240p resolution N64 and the arcade-perfect 480p DC is a generation wide. From compressed chiptunes to CD audio as well. Big difference.Right but so many of the same games were released for N64 and Dreamcast. Tony Hawk, Rayman 2, Shadowman, Hydro Thunder were all released on both N64 and Dreamcast around the same time so it feels weird to say one console is retro and one isn’t. The Dreamcast was sort of a bridge between console generations.
Mine is the 1988 Spectrum Holobyte version for MS-DOS. It was the very first release of the game in the US. I played that a lot on my dad's 286.What is everyone's favourite version of Tetris?
Tetris EffectWhat is everyone's favourite version of Tetris?