Ragamuffin Gunner
Lost in the Flood
I'm so sick of these threads. Change the channel if you don't like it
Well, people are changing the channel. Rating are down this year.
Love the irony too BTW!
I'm so sick of these threads. Change the channel if you don't like it
And that's the part I don't get from fans....like the post above mine.
We ALL KNOW the goalies are better.
We ALL KNOW the systems are better.
We ALL KNOW the goalie equipment is bigger.
We ALL KNOW the goalie themselves are bigger.
So with ALL these things going in the goalies favour, why is it such a big deal to increase the size of a net by 2-3 inches?
To me, it shouldn't be.
Call the ****ing obstruction, it's not that hard to figure out.
/threadThat's exactly right. Calling all of this obstruction that goes on these days - it's already on the books anyway - would:
1.) Increase PP's and obviously increase scoring
2.) Force teams to change how they play and open up 5v5 in a way we haven't seen since the lockout ended and they spent a season or so actually calling the obstruction penalties.
How many time does a guy dump a puck in the corner and the dman will go 5 feet out of his way to obstruct the forechecker? That should be called every single time. I don't care if it's in game 7 of the cup finals.
You let marginal players dictate the game when you allow them to essentially cheat by obstructing the more skilled players. It's not necessarily that the average player in the NHL has gotten so much better (though that is partially the case), it's also that the average player can obstruct so much and neutralize the skills of the better players.
And that's the part I don't get from fans....like the post above mine.
We ALL KNOW the goalies are better.
We ALL KNOW the systems are better.
We ALL KNOW the goalie equipment is bigger.
We ALL KNOW the goalie themselves are bigger.
So with ALL these things going in the goalies favour, why is it such a big deal to increase the size of a net by 2-3 inches?
To me, it shouldn't be.
That's exactly right. Calling all of this obstruction that goes on these days - it's already on the books anyway - would:
1.) Increase PP's and obviously increase scoring
2.) Force teams to change how they play and open up 5v5 in a way we haven't seen since the lockout ended and they spent a season or so actually calling the obstruction penalties.
How many time does a guy dump a puck in the corner and the dman will go 5 feet out of his way to obstruct the forechecker? That should be called every single time. I don't care if it's in game 7 of the cup finals.
You let marginal players dictate the game when you allow them to essentially cheat by obstructing the more skilled players. It's not necessarily that the average player in the NHL has gotten so much better (though that is partially the case), it's also that the average player can obstruct so much and neutralize the skills of the better players.
And the top teams aren't that good anymore either. Any one of like 18 teams can win the Cup. It's just an overly-balanced league.
Expansion would change that. Scoring would go up.
And the top teams aren't that good anymore either. Any one of like 18 teams can win the Cup. It's just an overly-balanced league.
56 points? This is *****ed honestly.Scoring has to go up again.
The top players are struggling to stay above a point per game.
Yep, expansion is going to force teams to play younger players or sign less talented guys to fill out a roster. Should open up things.
I want more scoring.
Clearly this is the only answer
tell the five guys cramming the front of the net to move outta the way
and that lovely basketball zone defense when puck possession is lost in the offensive zone ...
... that's a good point ... the catching glove is way to big too ... but not getting a point shot through ... every play or pass on the outside ... nothing clean to the net ever ... unless a fast break or mistake ... the trap was lemaire but hitchcock perfected the fine pointsUnfortunately(or rather fortunately) the play isn't like basketball where its feasible to create an illegal defense rule that is fair, and easily identified and enforced.
Lets get rid of the inner flap on goalie pads that is meant to facilitate the butterfly style of goaltending. There HAS to be a way to keep the entire knee and thigh protected when dropping to the ice without completely altering the angle and shape of the padding to promote the butterfly technique. Let goalies play the butterfly if they want but we should't have pads specifically designed to facilitate this style and technique.
As a fan of a team without superstars, I have no problem with scoring by committee.
This. People have the most elaborate theories about why scoring is down. The reason is literally no more complicated than the fact that the NHL doesn't strictly enforce holding, hooking and interference calls. It would be a different league if they re-calibrated their threshold on enforcement of these three rules.
goalies in '98 :
One of the reasons the scoring is down is goalies are bigger and better now days, but mainly it's because the offensive talent is not what it was lets says back in 80's and 90's.
Look at how many 100 point players they had back in 90's and compare it to today. Outside of Crosby no one gets 100 points today.
And the top teams aren't that good anymore either. Any one of like 18 teams can win the Cup. It's just an overly-balanced league.