OT: The Pittsburgher Thread: Ploff wins?!? Fire Tomlin

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Why do we assume that Arch is the second coming? He couldn't beat out Ewers, who is no great shakes himself.

He may not be but Ewers/Manning was as much of a QB competition as the ones the Steelers have pretended to have recently.
 
Why do we assume that Arch is the second coming? He couldn't beat out Ewers, who is no great shakes himself.
Because Ewers was senior and did nothing to lose the job. Ewers was a top 3 prospect himself coming out of high school. Both dudes had similar grades and pedigree. I think Arch is a much better prospect, but Ewers is a good player in his own right. Not sure how it's going to work in the NFL for him though. He is either going to flourish or quickly fizzle.

The ball I have seen of Arch, I would safely say whatever year he comes out, he's at least top 5, and I think there will be some real talk of him being the next generational guy. Some are already saying that, but I need to see more ball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nsvoyageurs
I fully expected him to stay until 27. No reason not to.

Arch doesn't have to rush to get to his career. He's good regardless. What a life.

Being born into football royalty with your grandfather and two uncles being good- great NFL QBs would be something.

You’d have to try real hard to f*** that kind of life up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nsvoyageurs
Being born into football royalty with your grandfather and two uncles being good- great NFL QBs would be something.

You’d have to try real hard to f*** that kind of life up.

And to his credit...he's not. He's honestly Sid levels of buttoned up.
 
Ehhh.



Most of the hype around him is last name. Will he develop under Sark? Yes. But we also watched a former #1 qb recruit stagnate as well. It’s honestly a crap shoot right now. Hell, by 2027 Julian Sayin might be the #1 qb in College. We just don’t know.
 
Most of the hype around him is last name. Will he develop under Sark? Yes. But we also watched a former #1 qb recruit stagnate as well. It’s honestly a crap shoot right now. Hell, by 2027 Julian Sayin might be the #1 qb in College. We just don’t know.
Sure. You're absolutely correct. He does look like he has it though - physical, mentally, and intangibly.
 
Arch Manning looks intriguing, but, obviously, he hasn't played enough.

BTW; I agree with Doug Whaley. The organization is paralyzed by its past; fear of the unknown; unable/unwilling to change course when necessary. They seem to think 2005 happens every year.
The author of this story is lost. You don't get a franchise QB by being mediocre but not awful every year. You need a plan to get that guy and building a team around him to help him succeed; being 9-8/10-7 every year isn't it. You go into a rebuild by acquiring as many assets as possible (some will work out, some won't) by trading TJ Watt/Minkah Fitzpatrick, etc & hiring a competent head coach and coaching staff to develop this QB.

Jim Rooney, brother of Art II and son of Dan, on Ross Tucker's podcast this week, saying people want to burn the city down if the team went 3-14. If 3-14 would guarantee a franchise QB (and a competent HC and coaching staff, I think the city of Pittsburgh and the Steelers fan base would survive that. That whole family is delusional/in denial.

 
If Arch = Eli Manning, he is still just a middling quarterback in today's NFL. Off the top of my head, the following are better than prime Eli:

Mahomes
Burrow
Allen
Jackson
Daniels
Hurts
Love
Herbert
Stroud

And the following are close:
Williams or Maye year 2
Stafford
Prescott
Purdy
Mayfield

I am cool to go all in on a QB in the 26 draft, I just wouldn't anoint Arch as that guy.
 
Arch Manning looks intriguing, but, obviously, he hasn't played enough.

BTW; I agree with Doug Whaley. The organization is paralyzed by its past; fear of the unknown; unable/unwilling to change course when necessary. They seem to think 2005 happens every year.
The author of this story is lost. You don't get a franchise QB by being mediocre but not awful every year. You need a plan to get that guy and building a team around him to help him succeed; being 9-8/10-7 every year isn't it. You go into a rebuild by acquiring as many assets as possible (some will work out, some won't) by trading TJ Watt/Minkah Fitzpatrick, etc & hiring a competent head coach and coaching staff to develop this QB.

Jim Rooney, brother of Art II and son of Dan, on Ross Tucker's podcast this week, saying people want to burn the city down if the team went 3-14. If 3-14 would guarantee a franchise QB (and a competent HC and coaching staff, I think the city of Pittsburgh and the Steelers fan base would survive that. That whole family is delusional/in denial.


If it guaranteed it sure, but it doesn’t. I’m just not a massive fan of this team trying to tank. If it happens so be it, but even if you sell off everyone, you need to:

1.) Hope that you’re actually bad enough to get a top pick.

2.) Hope there’s a QB prospect worthy of taking with a top pick.

3.) Hope that QB is capable of overcoming the terrible roster that got you the top pick.

I’m not opposed to selling off some guys to pick up assets but I think maintaining a somewhat competitive roster and being very aggressive when the opportunity presents itself is the way I’d prefer this team to go.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad