JTG
Registered User
- Sep 30, 2007
- 50,512
- 6,513
Black is nothing like McCullers. McCullers sucked and couldn't move. Black actually has pass rush juice and he can chase down plays (including screens). Black could potentially play 3 downs in my book, but he's fantastic at clogging the middle on run downs.
You are the only person that I have seen that said he could be a 3-down player and pass rush juice. I hope he does. I see him as a pure 2-down run stopper.
No doubt. He's not a sure thing to even do the thing they drafted him to do.
I'm just saying these grades that get put on these guys don't always take into account role. He's getting graded like every other DL and his pass grade is not going to be good which will bring down his overall grade. But that won't be his role in the NFL and certainly not on the Steelers.
I agree with you. I always think about Herbig - in 4-3 system he's probably useless. In our system, he's a stud.
Okay, I get where you're coming from better.
But I still think guys with the potential to execute a straight line style that well are too rare to call vanilla. The constant push for more explosive backs and the potential for big explosive guys to get paid more in other positions has changed the NFL in that way.
I also think those dudes can move the offence's needle and bring a very valuable component, and when it came to a room that already had Warren and Gainwell, a more straight line guy was more likely than another more shifty guy. And that in terms of what it does to the offence, it can be really dynamic.
I worry a bit about whether the blocking is going to be at the standard needed to help him as one of those get up to speed guys, but if he does, I think he's going to go pop off big, as this stat shows
If all else fails with this offense, run behind the right side. Frazier-McCormick-Fautanu should be our work horses in the run game and they really should be one of the better right sides in the league.
Johnson SEEMS to have more juice to his game than Najee. The thing with Najee is that you can only really use the eye test - they made sure he did NOTHING pre-draft so no one could hang being slow on him.
I like Howard as a locker room presence. I don't even care if he ever becomes the starter. I like his moxie. I think both he and McCord were guys that could lay a foundation here for the QB we take in 26/27 and providing some good competition.
With assuming the Steelers won't be in a position to draft one of the true "top guys" in the draft, the guy that I really want to watch more of is Klubnik from Clemson. He had a big year for Clemson but decided to return for another year anyway, while he seems like a pretty high IQ QB with a ton of athleticism.
He seems like a legitimate dual threat QB.
I don't think all of these guys are going to be bunched at the top. They should filter through the first 3 rounds with how things stand now - as you know that could all change.
Also have some Jr's in there that may stay - Arch being the main one.
Also just idle thinking ahead, competition for 1st round QBs next year...
Bills - No
Dolphins - No barring a catastrophic injury that seems more likely for them than any other team
Jets - Maybe Probably. If Fields guides them to a high QB pick and there's a guy they like there, I'd expect them to make the pick
Pats - No
Texans - No
Colts - Probably - if Richardson guides them there and he looks good to do so, they'll look
Jags - No because even if they suck they can't
Titans - No
Ravens - No
Bengals - No
Browns - Probably. Looking at it oh so nakedly
Chiefs - No
Chargers - No
Broncos - No
Raiders - Maybe. I think if Smith guides them there and the talent is there they'll look and they're a bad enough team that it'll be easy for it to happen.
Eagles - No
Commies - No
Cowboys - No
Giants - Maybe. If Schoen and Daboll are gone because they implode and the Giants are picking high, what new decision making team wants to be tied to Dart if the talent is there?
Buccs - No
Falcons - No because they can't
Panthers - Maybe. If Young regresses and results in another high pick, time to call it
Saints - Maybe. Shough maybe stops them taking gambles at 10, but doesn't stop them if they suck and pick top 5.
Lions - No
Vikings - No
Packers - No
Bears - No
Rams - Maybe. If they want to replace Stafford, that extra Falcons pick sits up very nicely for them.
Seahawks - Maybe. Can't believe a team tied to Darnold is immune to looking
Cardinals - No. Well... maybe if they finish 1OA. Maybe I should have done this by how high they have to finish to look.
49ers - No unless they don't sign Purdy.
So by my calculations, that's two teams I deffo expect to get involved and seven who I think will look if they're bad. Doesn't feel super great.
That actually shows better odds than I thought we'd have.