JTG
Registered User
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2007
- Messages
- 51,058
- Likes
- 6,144
*shrugs* All you two are doing is confirming my belief that people form biases over "wow" athleticism and refuse to consider the many forms of athleticism. Fields has wow athleticism, but looking at the numbers suggests that on a normal passing down it doesn't translate into a huge advantage on most plays a QB would run.
Which is why I don't really care about Fields' athleticism. It doesn't translate into an advantage. The only place it's an advantage is rushing, and I don't value rushing in QBs so I don't care. Arm strength could theoretically translate into an advantage but hasn't yet for him and tbh, I'm curious as to whether there's any quantifiable advantage for big armed QBs in the NFL.
And to be more specific -
Pickett is faster over 10 than Fields, Fields is faster over 20 and 40.
And given the NFL doesn't host numbers for velocity my source isn't as official as I'd like, but google Herbert combine velocity and 55 is the number you'll see repeated. Site that's got this all is ourlads.com,
edit:
And to get ahead of the argument on rushing QBs, here's why I don't rate them (despite being a ton of fun to watch).
Here's the three things rushing QBs can do -
1) Make a ton of yards on well designed run plays - passing QBs can also make a ton of yards on well designed plays
2) Make plays where there is no space to throw - if there's genuinely nobody to throw to, odds are the defence has given up so much space that even a very average QB athlete can make 1st down and it's questionable how much worthwhile extra the running QB gets
3) Force the defence to account for their run and open up better passing opportunities - And here's the kicker because, while that happens, the QB then has to be a good enough passer to take advantage.
And if the QB is, then they're good enough to take advantage of designing passing opportunities instead, which go for further on average and involve less injury risk, so they'll be a passing QB instead.
And if they're not then it doesn't matter how good a rusher they are because they can't take advantage, and will also get shut down against teams that can shut down the run.
And if a QB isn't rushing very often, the difference between being an amazing rusher and a merely okay rusher is very marginal.
Double edit: Since we're going off into the reeds, I'm just going to bring this back to the home point -
For those of us who view QB as a mainly cerebral position, for those of us who put a big emphasis on mentally tough, smart, point guard types who come up big in the big moments, there's pretty much nothing that can be said that'll make us like Fields unless someone's got some really surprising data/highlights from somewhere.
And if we want to make it a comparison with Pickett and liking him more then
a) 4th quarter stats
b) The possibility he could be that 4th quarter player more often without an absolutely asinine system
And I'd be happy not to mention Pickett's name again for the rest of the thread. Hell, Fields' name.
I don't know man. There is something about the twitch of the guys. Fields is sudden. Kenny is kind of like Ben where it was a bit more lumbering. Kenny is a surprisingly awesome athlete though. You know I love him. I'm not saying this as a dig on Kenny. I just think that when the player is on the field, Justin Fields way of moving, his twitch, and his creativity and comfort running the ball surpass Kenny by a long shot. I also think Fields has a signficantly bigger arm. He is certainly not without his warts, but I think Fields warts may be easier to overcome than Kenny's were. For Kenny to be truly great, that guy was going to have to have nuts the size of grapefruits. I think there is potential there still he may. I hope it happens in Philly. That'd be an awesome story.