OT: The Pittsburgher Thread: New Quarter Backs for the Handball team!

Status
Not open for further replies.

MrBrightside

Registered User
May 5, 2010
5,956
3,803
Franklin Park, PA
Everyone who wants to trade down because the top of the draft is deep is correct. I don’t, however, think it’s just that easy to do as other teams will view the draft the same way so unless there are guys who fall that a later 1st team wants, it’s going to be really tough to get good value trading back this year.
 

OnMyOwn

Worlds Apart
Sep 7, 2005
19,177
4,818
I’m fine with taking a C and not caring at all. Cole was such a huge negative last year. He was in the QB’s lap half the game.

If you watch some Wilson highlights of his best plays, his C was standing tall on blocks. I actually thought we were gonna pursue him this offseason.
 

Mr Jiggyfly

Registered User
Jan 29, 2004
34,443
19,490
I'm right there with you. I think sitting here, I'd be trying to maximize volume because of the depth of the draft. But if a guy we really like drops to 10-15 (Nabers)...I'd hope they'd be aggressive and go get him.

I think a good case could be made for WR, CB, etc so I would be fine with mostly anything.

I can’t ever remember being mad about a Steelers pick, maybe disappointed when they took Jarvis Jones and Edmunds… the Troy Edwards pick annoyed me but I wasn’t overly mad about it.

This team has enough holes even if they went DL I could see that as well.

I just think they have invested so damn much in the D that it’s time to focus some on the O, particularly the line.

I’m fine with taking a C and not caring at all. Cole was such a huge negative last year. He was in the QB’s lap half the game.

If you watch some Wilson highlights of his best plays, his C was standing tall on blocks. I actually thought we were gonna pursue him this offseason.

Cushenberry? I was hoping they would grab him in FA also.
 

xlm34

Registered User
Dec 1, 2008
3,339
3,413
I’m actually starting to wonder whether there’s a decent chance Frazier will be available in the second. At first I thought there was no shot but now I’m questioning that. He’s only a couple months out from a broken leg so you can probably throw the numbers out but he didn’t test particularly well at the Big 12 pro day. And I’ve seen some concerns over his ability in pass protection.

Definitely strikes me as the late second round center type we’ve seen the past couple of years. Just a matter of whether need pushes him up some draft boards.
 

Peat

Registered User
Jun 14, 2016
30,686
26,159
I’m actually starting to wonder whether there’s a decent chance Frazier will be available in the second. At first I thought there was no shot but now I’m questioning that. He’s only a couple months out from a broken leg so you can probably throw the numbers out but he didn’t test particularly well at the Big 12 pro day. And I’ve seen some concerns over his ability in pass protection.

Definitely strikes me as the late second round center type we’ve seen the past couple of years. Just a matter of whether need pushes him up some draft boards.

I think the thing about Frazier is nobody ever seemed to think he was a great athlete, but people love his toughness and attitude. There's a ton of guys who have the athleticism to play in the NFL and only so many of them have the mental and physical toughness to get torn up week after week and keep coming back.

So anyone who is jonesing for Frazier is probably happy as a clam that the guy is doing pro day drills four months after breaking a leg, knowing his numbers won't be great but still determined to compete. That right there is another tick in their box for Frazier having the toughness.

I'm waiting to see what the home stretch draft news is with him - what flaws people see when hyper-focusing, when leaks out from teams. I've seen some people worry about his lateral quickness and ability to pick up pass protection too.

But my guess is that Frazier goes at about the top of the range you can project for his talent, because teams will look at the toughness and feel safe he's not going to wash out on them. Which maybe still leaves him in play at 51, but I don't think the Pro Day necessarily changes things. It's not like the results were damning either, his speed is basically equal to Cushenberry.
 

Peat

Registered User
Jun 14, 2016
30,686
26,159
I think a good case could be made for WR, CB, etc so I would be fine with mostly anything.

I can’t ever remember being mad about a Steelers pick, maybe disappointed when they took Jarvis Jones and Edmunds… the Troy Edwards pick annoyed me but I wasn’t overly mad about it.

This team has enough holes even if they went DL I could see that as well.

I just think they have invested so damn much in the D that it’s time to focus some on the O, particularly the line.

I agree with most of what you've said, but particularly the bolded.

Yeah, they can improve the team just about everywhere but I feel like they're just not going to have a major jump until they can get a OL that regularly dominates. And the fact that we've been saying something like that for I have no idea how long at this point...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Jiggyfly

bigdaddyk88

Registered User
Apr 21, 2019
4,641
925
Everyone who wants to trade down because the top of the draft is deep is correct. I don’t, however, think it’s just that easy to do as other teams will view the draft the same way so unless there are guys who fall that a later 1st team wants, it’s going to be really tough to get good value trading back this year.
Depends on how far back you want to go. Philly and Dallas make great partners. Philly needs a cb and Dallas needs a C
 

JTG

Registered User
Sep 30, 2007
50,934
6,046
I wouldn't be against them trading back, but this draft is legitimately so good that it may be worth trading up. We can get a top 5 talent outside of the top 10 this year.
 

Captain Hook

Registered User
Jul 12, 2007
15,465
398
Everyone who wants to trade down because the top of the draft is deep is correct. I don’t, however, think it’s just that easy to do as other teams will view the draft the same way so unless there are guys who fall that a later 1st team wants, it’s going to be really tough to get good value trading back this year.
Yeah, I agree trading down is easier said than done. The depth of this draft depends what you mean by deep. Deep early? Yes. Deep through 3-4 rounds? Probably. I've heard people say it falls off hard after that though due to NIL deals keeping more underclassman in school these days. If true that's one of the benefits in moving up to 98 in the Pickett deal and moving from round 5 to round 4 prior to that in the Dotson deal.
I’m actually starting to wonder whether there’s a decent chance Frazier will be available in the second. At first I thought there was no shot but now I’m questioning that. He’s only a couple months out from a broken leg so you can probably throw the numbers out but he didn’t test particularly well at the Big 12 pro day. And I’ve seen some concerns over his ability in pass protection.

Definitely strikes me as the late second round center type we’ve seen the past couple of years. Just a matter of whether need pushes him up some draft boards.
It's possible. The dream scenario to me is one of those big time tackles in round one and then Frazier in round two. Between those two draft picks and Broderick Jones the O-Line would be set for years at that point.
 

xlm34

Registered User
Dec 1, 2008
3,339
3,413
I think the thing about Frazier is nobody ever seemed to think he was a great athlete, but people love his toughness and attitude. There's a ton of guys who have the athleticism to play in the NFL and only so many of them have the mental and physical toughness to get torn up week after week and keep coming back.

So anyone who is jonesing for Frazier is probably happy as a clam that the guy is doing pro day drills four months after breaking a leg, knowing his numbers won't be great but still determined to compete. That right there is another tick in their box for Frazier having the toughness.

I'm waiting to see what the home stretch draft news is with him - what flaws people see when hyper-focusing, when leaks out from teams. I've seen some people worry about his lateral quickness and ability to pick up pass protection too.

But my guess is that Frazier goes at about the top of the range you can project for his talent, because teams will look at the toughness and feel safe he's not going to wash out on them. Which maybe still leaves him in play at 51, but I don't think the Pro Day necessarily changes things. It's not like the results were damning either, his speed is basically equal to Cushenberry.

Yeah I’m also really curious to read through some of the final scouting reports on these guys. Dane Brugler’s massive scouting book is probably coming out soon which is always an awesome resource.

Not saying they’re bad prospects by any means but a little part of me is wondering if we’re seeing some overhyping of the center prospects just because of how massive that need is.
 

Peat

Registered User
Jun 14, 2016
30,686
26,159
Yeah I’m also really curious to read through some of the final scouting reports on these guys. Dane Brugler’s massive scouting book is probably coming out soon which is always an awesome resource.

Not saying they’re bad prospects by any means but a little part of me is wondering if we’re seeing some overhyping of the center prospects just because of how massive that need is.

Tbf, Brugler's been a guy leading that hyping charge. He's said stuff like 3 Cs could go in the first round. But maybe he's not as aggressive come the end. Ditto Jeremiah, the guy who mocked Frazier in the first round.

Or in other words, it's not like any of us dreamt that hype. But maybe some of us have brought into it enthusiastically because it's what we want to hear.
 

Mr Jiggyfly

Registered User
Jan 29, 2004
34,443
19,490
Yeah, I agree trading down is easier said than done. The depth of this draft depends what you mean by deep. Deep early? Yes. Deep through 3-4 rounds? Probably. I've heard people say it falls off hard after that though due to NIL deals keeping more underclassman in school these days. If true that's one of the benefits in moving up to 98 in the Pickett deal and moving from round 5 to round 4 prior to that in the Dotson deal.

It's possible. The dream scenario to me is one of those big time tackles in round one and then Frazier in round two. Between those two draft picks and Broderick Jones the O-Line would be set for years at that point.

Ya I agree.

I feel like the talent in this draft sets the Steelers up perfectly to fix their O-line for the next 7-8 years.

Every sign points to them going T in round 1, and Mims looks like their guy.

Mims has has a senior bowl meeting, a combine meeting, pro day visit from Khan and Tomlin and he also visited their South Side facility.

Doesn’t get much more smoke than that given their big need at RT and the boxes the Steelers always check off with first rounders.

There is also the Jones connection and the Steelers love to draft players from big time programs with pedigree.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: EVGENIMERLIN

Andy99

Registered User
Jun 26, 2017
53,220
35,010
Ya I agree.

I feel like the talent in this draft sets the Steelers up perfectly to fix their O-line for the next 7-8 years.

Every sign points to them going T in round 1, and Mims looks like their guy.

Mims has has a senior bowl meeting, a combine meeting, pro day visit from Khan and Tomlin and he also visited their South Side facility.

Doesn’t get much more smoke than that given their big need at RT and the boxes the Steelers always check off with first rounders.

There is also the Jones connection and the Steelers love big programs that know how to win championships.
Yeah agree that looks likely but given the depth at tackle, I’d rather pick a WR, TE Bowers, or CB in the first…if Thomas or Wiggins is there, to me that’s better asset management than tackle there…the corner they got from Carolina has bust potential as a starting outside CB and WR is more desperate to me, also Muth is always injured and not worth his next contract…
 

Mr Jiggyfly

Registered User
Jan 29, 2004
34,443
19,490
Yeah agree that looks likely but given the depth at tackle, I’d rather pick a WR, TE Bowers, or CB in the first…if Thomas or Wiggins is there, to me that’s better asset management than tackle there…the corner they got from Carolina has bust potential as a starting outside CB and WR is more desperate to me, also Muth is always injured and not worth his next contract…

Something has to give at T and WR as this draft is flush with both.

This may be the best WR class in 20 years, so we could make an argument either way about getting a T first and WR later or vice versa.

It looks like Mims though because he has checked off all the boxes and Steelers are really bad at covering their tracks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EVGENIMERLIN

Andy99

Registered User
Jun 26, 2017
53,220
35,010
Something has to give at T and WR as this draft is flush with both.

This may be the best WR class in 20 years, so we could make an argument either way about getting a T first and WR later or vice versa.

It looks like Mims though because he has checked off all the boxes and Steelers are really bad at covering their tracks.
Yeah true…I think we need a starting outside WR who is special, more than a starting tackle but whatever…
 
  • Like
Reactions: EVGENIMERLIN

Ulf5

Registered User
Feb 21, 2017
1,649
1,251
Yeah true…I think we need a starting outside WR who is special, more than a starting tackle but whatever…
I think it's a hell of a lot easier to get a starting WR after the 1st round than it is to get a starting T after the 1st round. But hey, I'm just an armchair gm lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EVGENIMERLIN

Peat

Registered User
Jun 14, 2016
30,686
26,159
Yeah true…I think we need a starting outside WR who is special, more than a starting tackle but whatever…

That WR would have to be pretty darn special to thrive in this offence if they don't get the line fixed. Not that most of the Tackles available at 20 will be day one instant fixes, but at least they might stop a repetition of this conversation every year.
 

Mr Jiggyfly

Registered User
Jan 29, 2004
34,443
19,490
Yeah true…I think we need a starting outside WR who is special, more than a starting tackle but whatever…

I’m not going to argue much as I’d love a beast at WR. I don’t think having a small slow WR getting the bulk of the targets and a passing game that lacked explosion were a coincidence.

I do think they take a C in the first two rounds since they put themselves in a corner.

So WR or T will get pushed back to round three.
 

Ryder71

Registered User
Nov 24, 2017
24,743
11,793
I’m actually starting to wonder whether there’s a decent chance Frazier will be available in the second.

I seriously doubt that. Most likely we'd have to move up into the mid/ late 30's, 35-38
 

Goalie_Bob

1992 Vezina (2nd)
Dec 30, 2005
4,495
2,184
Pittsburgh
I seriously doubt that. Most likely we'd have to move up into the mid/ late 30's, 35-38

Being the GM of Tennessee in the HFBoards mock draft gave me some insight into their draft picks. They do not have a 3rd round pick and only one 4th round pick. So I think they will look to trade down 5-15 places in the 2nd to pick up a 3rd.

And funny enough, if you take the Steelers 51+84 picks they equate to the Tennessee pick which is 38.

That being said, is it really a good idea to trade a 2nd and a 3rd for a less premium position like C?
 
  • Like
Reactions: EVGENIMERLIN

Mr Jiggyfly

Registered User
Jan 29, 2004
34,443
19,490
Being the GM of Tennessee in the HFBoards mock draft gave me some insight into their draft picks. They do not have a 3rd round pick and only one 4th round pick. So I think they will look to trade down 5-15 places in the 2nd to pick up a 3rd.

And funny enough, if you take the Steelers 51+84 picks they equate to the Tennessee pick which is 38.

That being said, is it really a good idea to trade a 2nd and 3rd for a less premium position like C?

They reach for a C at 20 or likely have to trade up in round two for one IMHO.

Pick your poison I guess.

I assume their “oh f*** what do we do now” options are Herbig who has a whopping 49 snaps as a pro center or Daniels who hasn’t played C since 2019.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EVGENIMERLIN

Goalie_Bob

1992 Vezina (2nd)
Dec 30, 2005
4,495
2,184
Pittsburgh
They reach for a C at 20 or likely have to trade up in round two for one IMHO.

Pick your poison I guess.

I assume their “oh f*** what do we do now” options are Herbig who has a whopping 49 snaps as a pro center or Daniels who hasn’t played C since 2019.

Or they believe a guy they can get in the 3rd/4th can come in and do a decent job, aka SvP, Limmer, Bortolini, Equakun.

To be honest, I would like to just use one pick on a Center. So either go with J P-J in the 1st or just see how it goes, grap Frazier in the 2nd or SvP/Bortolini/Limmer in the 3rd.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad