OT: The Pittsburgher Thread: 5 and 2 Justin who? Hand the Fields to Wilson

Double-Shift Lasse

Just post better
Dec 22, 2004
34,684
15,916
Exurban Cbus
As for the D, it was nice to see them stunting on the line to open holes for the LB’s to come in unimpeded. That has been severely lacking all of last season and most of this season. And we saw what happened with Cody Simon getting 3 sacks, 5 as a team and 8 tfl’s. They’re starting to find their rhythm at the best time of the year.
Calling Teryl Austin...
 
  • Like
Reactions: End of Line

Buddy Bizarre

Registered User
Jul 9, 2021
6,445
4,624

Don't even need to open the link. Steelers have a habit of running into stacked boxes on 1st and 2nd down. Which they've done repeatedly over the past 7 years or so.

That leads me to believe that this isn't truly Art Smith's offense. It's Smith's offense with a Tomlin twist (meaning maximizine TOP over yards per play).

Just when I'm starting to be a Tomlin believer, he shows me repeatedly who he is. I f***ing hate the dude.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andy99 and Peat

bigdaddyk88

Registered User
Apr 21, 2019
4,577
903
I doubt we win three of the remaining games…best case is probably a split with Browns and Bengals and lose the remaining…
They will sweep Cincinnati they always struggle on defense against the Steelers. Mason and Pickett best games last season were against them
Kc is very beatable
I do believe they lose to Philly and b more
 

xlm34

Registered User
Dec 1, 2008
3,311
3,390
Don't even need to open the link. Steelers have a habit of running into stacked boxes on 1st and 2nd down. Which they've done repeatedly over the past 7 years or so.

That leads me to believe that this isn't truly Art Smith's offense. It's Smith's offense with a Tomlin twist (meaning maximizine TOP over yards per play).

Just when I'm starting to be a Tomlin believer, he shows me repeatedly who he is. I f***ing hate the dude.

I really don’t quite get why people think this is the case. Running on early downs has been a staple of every Arthur Smith offense. The offense we have is an Arthur Smith offense.

Tomlin totally believes in his offensive philosophy though which is why he was hired.
 

Peat

Registered User
Jun 14, 2016
30,578
26,075
I really don’t quite get why people think this is the case. Running on early downs has been a staple of every Arthur Smith offense. The offense we have is an Arthur Smith offense.

Tomlin totally believes in his offensive philosophy though which is why he was hired.

I was all set to agree until I looked up TOP for Smith's past offences.

Smith's been bottom 10 4 out of 5 seasons. Now he's first.

As such, I struggle to argue with the idea that there's been a change in emphasis that's come from Tomlin. Or, in other words, a Smith offence with a Tomlin twist. I mostly believe that Smith is here because he and Tomlin have very similar ideas and he's doing his thing but on this, I struggle to argue with the bolded. Both in the sense that this isn't Smith, and that this is detrimental.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andy99

bigdaddyk88

Registered User
Apr 21, 2019
4,577
903
I really don’t quite get why people think this is the case. Running on early downs has been a staple of every Arthur Smith offense. The offense we have is an Arthur Smith offense.

Tomlin totally believes in his offensive philosophy though which is why he was hired.
Tomlin believes in this when he doesn’t have a top 10 Qb. I do hope they self scout and decide to throw it more on 1st. You know Cincinnati is going to play cover 2 so Muth and Austin should eat. Cleveland as a pure m2m defense should have Williams and GP eating
 

Buddy Bizarre

Registered User
Jul 9, 2021
6,445
4,624
I was all set to agree until I looked up TOP for Smith's past offences.

Smith's been bottom 10 4 out of 5 seasons. Now he's first.

As such, I struggle to argue with the idea that there's been a change in emphasis that's come from Tomlin. Or, in other words, a Smith offence with a Tomlin twist. I mostly believe that Smith is here because he and Tomlin have very similar ideas and he's doing his thing but on this, I struggle to argue with the bolded. Both in the sense that this isn't Smith, and that this is detrimental.

Thanks for what you said. Mimics what I was going to type.

We've now seen a pattern with multiple QB's, multiple OC's, multiple personnel. It appears no matter who is "in charge", the goal of the offense is merely to make it to 3rd down and manageable.
 

xlm34

Registered User
Dec 1, 2008
3,311
3,390
I was all set to agree until I looked up TOP for Smith's past offences.

Smith's been bottom 10 4 out of 5 seasons. Now he's first.

As such, I struggle to argue with the idea that there's been a change in emphasis that's come from Tomlin. Or, in other words, a Smith offence with a Tomlin twist. I mostly believe that Smith is here because he and Tomlin have very similar ideas and he's doing his thing but on this, I struggle to argue with the bolded. Both in the sense that this isn't Smith, and that this is detrimental.

Too much goes in to TOP (good and bad) for me to draw too many conclusions on that. Feeding Derrick Henry averaging 5+ yards per carry is going to get you down the field faster than feeding Najee Harris at 4 yards a carry. And if we look at his time in Atlanta, he’s getting a lot better QB play than he got there. I don’t know.

This is just the exact offense that everyone told us to expect from Arthur Smith. Running early and often even if it’s not working? Check. Tons of play action? Check. Maddening red zone plays to Patterson? Unfortunately check.
 

Peat

Registered User
Jun 14, 2016
30,578
26,075
Too much goes in to TOP (good and bad) for me to draw too many conclusions on that. Feeding Derrick Henry averaging 5+ yards per carry is going to get you down the field faster than feeding Najee Harris at 4 yards a carry. And if we look at his time in Atlanta, he’s getting a lot better QB play than he got there. I don’t know.

This is just the exact offense that everyone told us to expect from Arthur Smith. Running early and often even if it’s not working? Check. Tons of play action? Check. Maddening red zone plays to Patterson? Unfortunately check.

Eh. I agree a ton goes into it - not least the defensive side of the ball, as nothing feeds TOP like a defence regularly getting 3 and outs - but I still find it hard to believe that if a team really, really valued it, they couldn't boost it higher than was happening with Smith previously.

Which says to me that Smith doesn't value it that highly. And we've heard a ton about how Tomlin values it.

What would Smith be doing different? I don't know, but I still believe there's something going on there. I don't think he'd be as heavily interception allergic either which is a Tomlin thing too.
 

MrBrightside

Registered User
May 5, 2010
5,917
3,756
Franklin Park, PA
Too much goes in to TOP (good and bad) for me to draw too many conclusions on that. Feeding Derrick Henry averaging 5+ yards per carry is going to get you down the field faster than feeding Najee Harris at 4 yards a carry. And if we look at his time in Atlanta, he’s getting a lot better QB play than he got there. I don’t know.

This is just the exact offense that everyone told us to expect from Arthur Smith. Running early and often even if it’s not working? Check. Tons of play action? Check. Maddening red zone plays to Patterson? Unfortunately check.
This is exactly right. There were always upsides and downsides to Smith, but Tomlin wanted a conservative, run first, low-risk offense and that's what Smith delivers. For better or worse.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad