OT: The Pittsburgher Thread: 5 and 2 Justin who? Hand the Fields to Wilson

WickedWrister

Registered User
Jul 25, 2008
11,322
5,978
Philadelphia
The Joe Burrow philosophy.

Which I agree with.

And I agree about putting them into a larger story, both in terms of what it means for the team and what's going wrong. It would be great to have clean pocket stats to put side by side (I looked and couldn't find, but I know Herbert's the league leader from a clean pocket right now).

I would point out though that the stats say Fields didn't do a great job of avoiding sacks.

No, but Fields only being league average in pressure to sack rate is a pretty substantial improvement compared to his time with the Bears.

Regarding Russ, I think some of the charts you posted confirm what we're seeing with our own eyes in the game - he's been borderline great when he's able to stay on schedule, but the improvisational part of his game is pretty much gone. He can still move around a little bit but the results of extending the play have not usually been positive.
 
Last edited:

TooManyHumans

Registered User
May 4, 2018
2,889
4,087
I think they're counting the decision to punt on 4th and 1 in the 1st quarter. I don't consider this one egregious, we were on our 29 yard line.


Is he considering that the Steelers and Ravens games are lower scoring environments than most games? Because they sure seem to be.

So what? PFF grades are just an attempt at evaluating a players contribution to production. I get that Steelers fans have a bias because of all the Myles Garrett stuff, but this has nothing to do with PFF.
The problem is that they use random people who don't necessarily understand what they are seeing to generate their data.
 

WickedWrister

Registered User
Jul 25, 2008
11,322
5,978
Philadelphia
Is he considering that the Steelers and Ravens games are lower scoring environments than most games? Because they sure seem to be.


The problem is that they use random people who don't necessarily understand what they are seeing to generate their data.
I'm not sure if his win probability model accounts for that. There's a lot of inputs though, I'd imagine the point spread is one of them. Boswell is also a better than league average kicker so it's not reflecting that either in these scenarios.

Ok but PFF had nothing to do with anything that was being discussed. I swear people just use them as an analog to bash anything analytical lol.
 

Peat

Registered User
Jun 14, 2016
30,573
26,072
No, but Fields only being league average in pressure to sack rate is a pretty substantial improvement compared to his time with the Bears.

That bit is but the bit where he's still getting himself into trouble more than anyone else isn't.

Regarding Russ, I think some of the charts you posted confirm what we're seeing with our own eyes in the game - he's been borderline great when he's able to stay on schedule, but the improvisational part of his game is pretty much gone. He can still move around a little bit but the results of extending the play have not usually been positive.

Yeah. So far all these charts are "that makes sense".

It's interesting looking at Fields and Wilson's passing stats side by side. There are stats suggesting Fields is a better individual player at the moment without even looking at running. I mostly don't believe that's the case, but I did look at them because I did kind of wonder at just how much better Wilson's feast or famine approach was over Fields dink and dunk.
 

JTG

Registered User
Sep 30, 2007
50,891
6,011
Fields did much better staying within Art's system. Russ is a better QB though. I'd honestly play Fields in Clevaland. Russ can't hold on to the ball for 7 seconds in this game if they get the snow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pengwins

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
85,840
86,566
Redmond, WA
They need to implement Fields more in the offense as a running threat, but the little I’ve seen makes me see immense value in keeping him as a backup.

I think you can probably end up getting Wilson and Fields for $30 million combined, with Wilson taking a cheap starter deal and Fields taking a good backup deal.
 

Double-Shift Lasse

Just post better
Dec 22, 2004
34,675
15,897
Exurban Cbus
im very much in the 'same ol tomlin frame' but they win tonight and i have to start thinking they have something
LOL they're 8-2 and just beat the Ravens but they don't "have something" until they beat the Browns?

Look, I'll be disappointed if they lose (especially since my family, including some houseguests from Denmark are going to the game) but teams win games they shouldn't and lose games they shouldn't every year.
 

cookthebooks

Registered User
Oct 4, 2017
3,200
1,793
LOL they're 8-2 and just beat the Ravens but they don't "have something" until they beat the Browns?

Look, I'll be disappointed if they lose (especially since my family, including some houseguests from Denmark are going to the game) but teams win games they shouldn't and lose games they shouldn't every year.
thats right, i do not care about the regular season and i am not yet sold on this teams ability to perform in the playoffs
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buddy Bizarre

Andy99

Registered User
Jun 26, 2017
52,944
34,725
It seems to have a changed a bit the last two years, but prior to that Thursday night home games were the biggest advantage in the NFL.
Hasn’t changed for the Steelers much…we suck at TNF road games, and we’re bad in Cleveland…can’t believe all the prognosticators picking us to win this game…I’m putting money on Cleveland lol

 

TooManyHumans

Registered User
May 4, 2018
2,889
4,087
On the road, against a divisional rival.

It's the prototypical trap game.
What do you mean by trap game? Usually it means a team is overlooking the opponent. I don't think that is the case at all. I think the problem is the short week after a tough opponent, a road game, and crappy weather. I don't consider that a trap so much as simply a tough scenario.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Double-Shift Lasse

Double-Shift Lasse

Just post better
Dec 22, 2004
34,675
15,897
Exurban Cbus
What do you mean by trap game? Usually it means a team is overlooking the opponent. I don't think that is the case at all. I think the problem is the short week after a tough opponent, a road game, and crappy weather. I don't consider that a trap so much as simply a tough scenario.
Plus it's the NFL. There's not that much separating good teams from bad ones. Hell, we can't even decide if the team we watch all the time is good.

Anyway, I agree with this. I also feel like calling something a "trap game" is an easy pre-excuse for the possibility of losing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TooManyHumans

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad