Movies: The Official "Movie of the Week" Club Thread IV

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Two weeks ago my wife gave birth to our first child, and we're still figuring out how this parenting thing works (also hence why I was late with Thief of Bagdad review despite having watched it 3 weeks ago). So my participation might be a bit sporadic moving forward. But I intend on catching up eventually.

There's a period of time at around 3-6 months where you can bring your baby everywhere and they just sleep in their car seat that you bring in with you.

Don't be afraid and use that time wisely. My son was a staple on the table of our booth asleep while we were watching hockey at the local pub.

Eventually they get old enough where they can tolerate about 60 minutes of a restaurant and that's it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nakatomi and kihei
Until it benefits you to sell mom out and become the cool parent at least

And Congrats Jevo/Mrs Jevo, enjoy it and soak it all in
With a newborn you're 100% in pure survival mode.

I am not sure if there is a such thing as a cool parent tbh (except to other kids; one other kid at my daughter's school cries if she doesn't see my wife at school pickup lol.) Kids know that parents aren't peers, and if you attempt to be a peer they will eat you alive IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kihei
With a newborn you're 100% in pure survival mode.

I am not sure if there is a such thing as a cool parent tbh (except to other kids; one other kid at my daughter's school cries if she doesn't see my wife at school pickup lol.) Kids know that parents aren't peers, and if you attempt to be a peer they will eat you alive IMO.


Yeah, you are definitely not the cool one
 
I have never been even the slightest hint of cool at anything in any possible way in my entire life, that should surprise no one.

I'll give you a freebie to help you on your way...


"Mom says we probably shouldn't get that __________ (slime / trumpet / pony / etc.) but I think it would be ok this one time."

Then you get home and just play dumb
 
Yeah, you are definitely not the cool one

I started playing Rush in the car (to make sure he ends up a nerd) but only when Mrs_NyQuil wasn't in the car.

Eventually, we got into the car as a family and he was ready.

"What do you want to listen to, bud?"

"Rush!"

"Rush? Why?"

"Rush is power."

"Honey, I have no clue where he's getting this from. Maybe from his little friends at school?"
 
I started playing Rush in the car (to make sure he ends up a nerd) but only when Mrs_NyQuil wasn't in the car.

Eventually, we got into the car as a family and he was ready.

"What do you want to listen to, bud?"

"Rush!"

"Rush? Why?"

"Rush is power."

"Honey, I have no clue where he's getting this from. Maybe from his little friends at school?"

That's good stuff, I can see Rush being a tough sell for a lot of today's youth

My daughter is not a big fan of my musical choices, says it is "too loud", though she does like Breakin the Law, so maybe it's not a total lost cause yet
 
Two weeks ago my wife gave birth to our first child, and we're still figuring out how this parenting thing works (also hence why I was late with Thief of Bagdad review despite having watched it 3 weeks ago). So my participation might be a bit sporadic moving forward. But I intend on catching up eventually.
Congratulations!
 
Two weeks ago my wife gave birth to our first child, and we're still figuring out how this parenting thing works (also hence why I was late with Thief of Bagdad review despite having watched it 3 weeks ago). So my participation might be a bit sporadic moving forward. But I intend on catching up eventually.
Wonderful news. When my partner was pregnant for the first time, we were crossing Bloor in the Annex section of Toronto and a little old Italian lady all dressed in black was crossing the other way. When she passed us she looked at my partner and said "Get all the sleep now you can, dearie." We didn't know what she was talking about. Once the baby arrived, we found our real quick. If you can, sleep when the baby sleeps, which, I know, is not always easy for both partners. It's a wonderful adventure, though.
 
Last edited:
Kfs3oKQMErCpXLUYSjy21bkKwN3.jpg


Two for the Road (1967) Directed by Stanley Donen

Two for the Road has fascinated and perplexed me for decades. I hadn’t revisited it in a very long time, and it was indeed interesting re-experiencing my feelings about if from so long ago when I was essentially a different person, 22 as opposed to (gulp) 80 just. I have always realised that it was far from a perfect movie. The late middle section drags, and screenwriter Frederic Raphael (Darling; Far from the Madding Crowd; Eyes Wide Shut) seems to not care greatly for his minor characters whom he presents as annoying caricatures with no depth whatsoever. Clearly, he is interested in the relationship between Mark (Albert Finney) and Joanna (Audrey Hepburn), and that’s what grabbed me, too. To suggest that Two for the Road belongs in the romantic comedy category is to place a rather broody fox among the chickens in the hen house. Touring around Europe together during various periods of the characters' lives provides some strong romantic elements, and funny, even witty, moments are not in short supply, but the movie has a venom that seemed utterly foreign to Hollywood movies about romantic relationships. A lot of the time Mark and Joanna spend talking about how unhappy they are with one another, with Mark being the more constant offender on that score. Theirs is not exactly a love/hate relationship, but it is a relationship that seems continuously in a state of crisis where the scale between contentment and misery has a very delicate balance.

Likely this rather atypical relationship had more impact on me than expected because of the performers. Hepburn plays her character as a slightly older variation of Reggie in Charade: charming, lovely, intoxicating, vulnerable, deeply sympathetic. By the standards of the mid-sixties, she is about ten years too old for the role, but her appeal is such that I never thought of that the first time I saw the movie. Finney, though, my god, he sinks his incisors hard into all of Mark’s rather jarring character flaws. You get the feeling deep down that she loves him, but it is not so certain the other way around. He is like the character in the Eagles’ song who can’t tell you why he stays, but he stays anyway. Finney walks the finest of lines, just charming enough to keep us from seeing him as a brute, just vulnerable enough to semi-overlook his crustiness. But he is the reason the movie has an acerbic tone that is so memorable. I kept comparing some of the wittier dialogue to Charade’s script. There are lines read by Finney that sound like real put-downs of his partner. I couldn’t help but think that Cary Grant would have read many of these same lines with a completely different inflection that would have turned them into inward self-deprecations rather than outward insults. However, Finney plays the edge for all it is worth, and in doing so, literally drags the film into another dimension.

Another thing that makes the movie seem very non-Hollywood (besides all the talk of bad sex) is that Stanley Donen (Singing in the Rain; Indiscreet; Charade) steals the style of his movie so directly from French New Wave director Alain Resnais that he could literally be charged with plagiarism. Like in Resnais’ seminal works, time is a very malleable thing—you can go forward in it or backward in it at any moment—and the fragmentary nature of time does a lot to contribute to the bittersweet mood of Two for the Road. The non-linearity mimics the characters’ memories in a lot of ways with one association bringing on another, creating a mishmash of moods and feelings that get smooshed together as though they exist in some dimension beyond time.

In the end, Two for the Road still left me with a sense of melancholy. This is to Donen’s credit, I think. He uses a beautifully reflective and pensive theme written by Henry Mancini that fits the mood of the film perfectly. I actually could have used a little less of it, to be honest. But whenever I hear the tune (Pat Metheny has an especially lovely version), it immediately puts me back within the feelings that the film visits upon me. Our lives are so incredibly random. The movie doesn’t make a big point of this, but it doesn’t ignore it either. Mark could have easily gone off with Jackie (Jacqueline Bisset) and had a whole other life. As could we all. The penultimate scene of the movie is a quarrel in a Mercedes in which Mark keeps jerking the car to a stop to say something every time Joanna says something. That herky-jerky rhythm, start and stop, start and stop, mirrors their relationship is so many ways that it seems a fitting ending. It’s like neither will ever quite get comfortable with their relationship again, that the status quo still has meaning but it is not strong enough to hold forever. A Paul Simon line provides the perfect epitaph for the film. “Love emerges, and it disappears. I do it for your love.”

Sidenote: If there is a happy version of this movie, it probably is Before Sunrise. Though, of course, the rest of the trilogy leans ever closer to Two for the Road territory.
 
Last edited:
Two for the Road
Donen (1968)
“They don’t look happy.”

A time-hopping look at a relationship between Mark (Albert Finney) and Joanna (Audrey Hepburn), bounding between its dissolving in current time back to previous trips they took, from their first meeting to multiple road trips in the ensuing years and the full spectrum of emotions along the way.

There are things I like. Finney and Hepburn are good. Arguably TOO good. The roadtrip with an old flame, William Daniels’ uber-pedantic Howard and their bratty kid is a fun bit of comedy. Several good visual gags (the banana). Director Stanley Donen tries his hand at some Richard Lester-style high-speed zaniness. I even chuckled at the winking “funny face” line. I appreciate the tone which has a sharp edge and keen eye about relationships that wasn't common in that day.

But I keep stumbling back and forth over the ending. We want Mark and Joanna to be together because they’re Albert Finney and Audrey Hepburn and they’re beautiful and charming … but should we? I feel like the actual text of the movie is that these two shouldn’t be together and the eventual (and inevitable) happy ending feels false. There is a curtness here between the two that was probably at least a little radical for the time and shakes it a bit from a traditional romance or dramady but even when they’re calling each other “bitch” and “bastard,” it’s with a flirty edge. They sell it because they’re winsome, but you know what, Mark in particular IS a bastard. They cheat on each other so neither is without sin here, Mark is bit of a blowhard so I put a little more blame on him. There is something to be said about knowing and accepting the faults in a partner but if that’s the message here, I’m not sure how well that’s supported.

As I posted a few weeks back, watching this spurred me to spend a weekend watching a mini-marathon of dissolving marriage movies – Scenes from a Marriage (the long one), Possession, Before Midnight and Eyes Wide Shut (funny enough also written by Frederic Raphael, a fact I honestly did not know until I put the movie on). The marathon made for an interesting mostly chronological watch that by sheer coincidence hit the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s and 2010s.

Two for the Road wasn’t the best of the bunch but in some ways it was the most interesting. It is the only one where I felt it ended in a wrong, if not dishonest, place. My question after this journey was: Is that just a product of the time? If they did it again would they do it the same way? It is the oldest of the five movies I watched and the one most firmly tethered to a more “traditional” time. Scenes and its matter-of-factness is said to have contributed to a rise in divorce in Europe (just as Sideways hurt merlot sales), but it’s a few years later when norms and thinking had begun to change. Do those years make a big difference?

Still without this step, do some of the future films come? The Before series seems particularly indebted to this movie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kihei
Two for the Road
Donen (1968)
“They don’t look happy.”

Two for the Road wasn’t the best of the bunch but in some ways it was the most interesting. It is the only one where I felt it ended in a wrong, if not dishonest, place. My question after this journey was: Is that just a product of the time? If they did it again would they do it the same way? It is the oldest of the five movies I watched and the one most firmly tethered to a more “traditional” time. Scenes and its matter-of-factness is said to have contributed to a rise in divorce in Europe (just as Sideways hurt merlot sales), but it’s a few years later when norms and thinking had begun to change. Do those years make a big difference?

Still without this step, do some of the future films come? The Before series seems particularly indebted to this movie.
It is a thing that both Two for the Road and Before Sunrise are/were very good at doing. They each excited debates about their respective endings, both of which are really fair game for interpretation. I thought Mark and Joanna's relationship might survive the first time I saw Two for the Road; now, though, I think they have already reached a point of no return. To reference Paul Bowles: "They know it is over, they just don't know that they know yet." Similarly after Before Sunrise, but before the sequels, there were endless debates about whether Jesse and Celine pick up where they left off the following summer. It was really about 50/50 among people I knew. I was in the "hell, yes, of course they do" camp. But that was never a slam dunk debate.

So I wonder if Linklater does a part four to Jesse and Celine's story, whether they will end up together or not? I hope there is a part four. And this time I have the feeling that they don't, that they go their separate ways. Ours is not an age that makes it easy to believe in the enduring nature of true love.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad