Dekes For Days
Registered User
- Sep 24, 2018
- 22,105
- 16,639
Health was most certainly not "in the Leafs favour" in the Montreal series.That said, the heath and talent factor was still in the Leafs favour with Montreal.
Health was most certainly not "in the Leafs favour" in the Montreal series.That said, the heath and talent factor was still in the Leafs favour with Montreal.
Why have the Isles had more success in the playoffs? The same reason why the Leafs have struggled. Goaltending, depth contributions and a more or less healthy team.
I'm pretty happy with where we are situated right now. It's not like we have an actual disaster of a GM like Benning. Now there a powder keg waiting to blow a team up. (If the fuse hasn't been lit already)
Health was most certainly not "in the Leafs favour" in the Montreal series.
With all due respect has Dubas done anything to fix the goaltending issues?
Do you feel that we now have top 5 goaltending?
We did quite well against the Cup finalists despite the injuries, but that doesn't change the fact that health was most certainly not "in the Leafs favour" in the Montreal series.Obviously their healthy talent helped them overcome the injury to the tune of a 3-1 series lead against the worst qualifying playoff team.
We did quite well against the Cup finalists despite the injuries, but that doesn't change the fact that health was most certainly not "in the Leafs favour" in the Montreal series.
We did quite well against the Cup finalists despite the injuries, but that doesn't change the fact that health was most certainly not "in the Leafs favour" in the Montreal series.
That's an entirely different discussion. The fact is, we dealt with more injury issues than Montreal. Health was not in our favour in that series.Before the series, if you knew Tavares would be out... you’d have taken their roster over ours?
That's an entirely different discussion. The fact is, we dealt with more injury issues than Montreal. Health was not in our favour in that series.
The players who replaced our injured players were not better than the injured players, and the players who played through injuries were not better than if they were healthy. We dealt with more injury issues than Montreal. Health was not in our favour in that series. There is really no debating that fact.we had better players who were healthy.
i absolutely agree with the fingerprints.
And I absolutely agree with the reality that talent and health of a roster have a significant impact on success.
That said, the heath and talent factor was still in the Leafs favour with Montreal.
While we lost Tavares early, we still got out to a 3-1 series lead against the worst qualifying team.
And in the 11 periods of hockey that followed (3 games, 2 OTs) we only out scored Montreal 1 time.
That’s either talent or tactics. Or both.
Not to mention that Hyman was coming off a sprained MCL that had kept him out for over a month, and did not look 100%.Injuries? also lost Muzzin(our best playoff D) again, lost Foligno(our big deadline playoff pickup) half the series and played hurt the other half, Matthews playing on a wrist that needed to be surgically repaired.....not to mention Tavares was on a heater and playing his best hockey of the season coming into the playoffs. There wasnt a team more banged up than the Leafs.
Injuries? also lost Muzzin(our best playoff D) again, lost Foligno(our big deadline playoff pickup) half the series and played hurt the other half, Matthews playing on a wrist that needed to be surgically repaired.....not to mention Tavares was on a heater and playing his best hockey of the season coming into the playoffs. There wasnt a team more banged up than the Leafs.
Tactics? Despite the injuries, the Leafs outshot and out chanced the Habs the last 3 games. You know what bad tactics are? Throwing a pizza up the middle to give a team a 2 on 0 in overtime or giving away a game in your own end when your team has the other on the ropes.
Talent? The Leafs have now outshot teams 175-132 in elimination games the last two playoffs and goaltending stands at:
Opposition Goaltending: .943%
Leafs Goaltending: .879%
I think I see the biggest talent hurdle. The coaching has been solid, the top 6 and top 4 have great stats. Depth players not producing and throwing games away and a massive difference in goaltending have killed us.
With all due respect has Dubas done anything to fix the goaltending issues?
Do you feel that we now have top 5 goaltending?
Not to mention that Hyman was coming off a sprained MCL that had kept him out for over a month, and did not look 100%.
I believe NYI played much of last season and the entire playoffs without their captain. I also can't help but wonder what our goaltending situation would be if Lou was still here.
Some of you still think that Lou did a great job here with his throwing away of 2nd's for 2 fourth liners, and leaving his successor with $11 million in immovable contracts and 3 elite star players coming off ELC's?![]()
Yep. Funny enough, that 1 point was actually a goal by Marner, incorrectly attributed to Hyman.Might have been the reason he only had 1 point in 7 games.....well that and Price of course.
when you talk elimination games... that’s not just game 7 right?
Muzzin outscored Marner and Matthews combined.
I see a problem.
Total elimination games the last 2 years? When it comes to all 5 games the last 2 years:
Points for Matthews (5 points)/Marner (4 points)/Nylander(5 points): 14
Points for the entire rest of the team including the D: 14
The players who replaced our injured players were not better than the injured players, and the players who played through injuries were not better than if they were healthy. We dealt with more injury issues than Montreal. Health was not in our favour in that series. There is really no debating that fact.
How you think we stacked up against Montreal through all of the injuries is an entirely different discussion.
While true, it should be noted that 8 of those 14 points came in Game 4 of the CBJ which was a most atypical game.
4 more came in Game 5 against the Habs (3 of which were secondary assists)
The final 2 were achieved far too late in Game 7.
So sure, 14 points in 5 games sounds ok, but aside from the Game 4 heroics, I would consider it a disappointment overall.
You could probably debate that fact. I mean they also won 3 games with key injuries. It was looking at one point like they were going to win the series.
You could probably debate that fact. I mean they also won 3 games with key injuries. It was looking at one point like they were going to win the series.