Burrows is a question mark for me because he really was a replacement level player away from the Sedins.
All the credit in the world to him for being able to mesh with those two better than the legion of names the Canucks tried before or after him, Im just not sure he’s better than his scouting report without falling into that very specific situation.
he was a really good bottom 6 winger who deserved the chance to play up with the sedins. definition of a hard worker: started in the QMJHL when he was 19 and didn't do that well. next year, PPG player. year after, played in the ECHL, didn't do that well. next year, PPG player. year after, played in the AHL, didn't do that well. next year, PPG player and gets his first NHL call-up.
obviously, his point totals are elevated because of the sedins, but people don't know that during his first NHL stint in 2005-06, he formed a decent line with bertuzzi and kesler. burrows' first career nhl hat trick is assisted by kesler and bertuzzi with no sedins involved.
so burrows probably isn't the most uninspiring prospect given that teams could clearly see he was improving year after year, but i really don't think it's fair to call him a replacement level player.