At the time of the offer sheet, I thought the best decision was to let both players go. Both of them hadn't proven anything and I didn't think that they, especially Holloway, would break out in this manner. I remember that Ryan McLeod was in a very similar situation a few years ago and he took a one-year contract around $800,000 to $900,000. Why couldn't Holloway do the same? Holloway hadn't proven more than McLeod in his time here. Then, we offered McLeod a contract for similar to what Holloway signed for in St. Louis and he did shit all, making me think that Holloway would follow a similar path to McLeod, Yamamoto, Puljujarvi, and many others than we overpaid for a small sample size.
Now, it's looking like we made a horrible decision. Was Holloway mismanaged and hence unhappy here? Is this yet another case of not knowing what we have in a player? Or was it another case of a player flourishing once he leaves this organization? I have no idea what to think anymore.