The Loss of Broberg and Holloway Gripe Thread

McDNicks17

Moderator
Jul 1, 2010
42,838
33,287
Ontario
C'mon. Was only a 38 game season and player scored 6 goals. 5 more in playoffs. Prorates to 15Gs for an energy player with all kinds of upside and motor. The only question concerning Holloway was injuries. The injury he had this season was a fluke, could happen to anybody. On potential alione, and already demonstrated, Holloway was worth more, and clearly was.
That's just how it goes for RFAs though. There's basically two groups. The ones that prove themselves on their ELC and get big money 8 year deals and the others that get >$1.5M deals to prove themselves.

Can you think of any examples of RFAs that got a ~$2M deal after their ELC?
 

Drivesaitl

Finding Hemingway
Oct 8, 2017
50,125
64,777
Islands in the stream.
Holloway is the type of complimentary player that you win Cups with.
I don't even know how the Oilers could be playing the Dallas Stars in a series and not realize that at worst Holloway is a bigger Stankoven. Its just incredible that we played the Stars with 3 very good young playes that were huge for them and didn't realize the contributions of those players, or any of our own prospects. Sometimes its harder to follow this org. Margins are so fine in playoffs. Win/lose often on a thread. Now the Oilers have to make up in TDL what they lost in offseason. Still a good team but the club could have a lot more youth legs than it has.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Behind Enemy Lines

Drivesaitl

Finding Hemingway
Oct 8, 2017
50,125
64,777
Islands in the stream.
That's just how it goes for RFAs though. There's basically two groups. The ones that prove themselves on their ELC and get big money 8 year deals and the others that get >$1.5M deals to prove themselves.

Can you think of any examples of RFAs that got a ~$2M deal after their ELC?
Fair comment but how many orgs put a bluechip prospect like Broberg and Holloway on rotated AHL carousel and riding bench up here for so many years? Not many teams would do that in the first place, and especially with quicker to unpack forwards. I'm on record fwiw saying that both Bro and Holloway should've been up in the show playng games more than they were given by the club.

To answer your question, just going off memory? Shawn Horcoff? I'm not a capologist sort.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Perfect_Drug

McShogun99

Registered User
Aug 30, 2009
18,879
15,611
Edmonton
These guys are paid millions of dollars to manage this team. Sorry, but being surprised isn't an excuse. Could've been the same team, could've been two separate teams. The fact remains that they dropped the ball and hard. and given how average this team is so far this season coupled with the successes of the outgoing players makes this that much worse.

Imagine having nothing to show for 4 years of drafting.
JJ was part of one of the most successful agencies in the NHL, they 100% knew of any potential offer sheets. They're just playing it off as not knowing to the fan base to make it look like it came out of nowhere instead of management not taking it seriously and planning poorly for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drivesaitl

McDNicks17

Moderator
Jul 1, 2010
42,838
33,287
Ontario
Fair comment but how many orgs put a bluechip prospect like Broberg and Holloway on rotated AHL carousel and riding bench up here for so many years? Not many teams would do that in the first place, and especially with quicker to unpack forwards. I'm on record fwiw saying that both Bro and Holloway should've been up in the show playng games more than they were given by the club.

To answer your question, just going off memory? Shawn Horcoff? I'm not a capologist sort.
Hard to say who is to blame for the carousel.

I'd say they both clearly needed AHL development time and definitely benefitted from it in the end, but agents hate the AHL because it costs them money. It's no secret that Broberg demanded a trade because of it.

As for examples, I've got nothing. I did a quick look and found more guys taking pay cuts like a Juuso Parssinen in Nashville than I did guys making more than $1.5M.
 
Last edited:

Drivesaitl

Finding Hemingway
Oct 8, 2017
50,125
64,777
Islands in the stream.
I'm reminded of that scene in the Empire Strikes Back where the Imperial Captain comes out of hyperspace too close to Hoth and alerts the rebels to an incoming Imperial attack, allowing them the ability to get prepared for an assault.

"He is as clumsy as he is stupid."


And if that salary cap doesn't get used at all? Or used on a worse player? The pro scouting for this team is bloody awful.
I wouldn't get any Star Wars reference because I've only watched one of the movies ever, and only once. heh. I even watched Spaceballs instead.
 

Behind Enemy Lines

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
17,056
18,860
Vancouver
Seems like a pretty standard offer for an RFA coming off a 9 point season to me.

I think he got pretty lucky that the Broberg situation was happening at the same time. Without Ferris orchestrating the whole thing, Holloway probably signs somewhere around there like 99% of RFAs do.
Holloway was also coming off a 7 point, 25 game Cup run. His 5 goals including the one below was tied for six on a team that came up one goal short of a Stanley Cup. Solid proof points for an age 22 who worked himself into line 2 playoff ice-time.


Oilers management complacency walked their two young talents to the exit door.
 
Apr 12, 2010
75,724
34,864
Calgary
JJ was part of one of the most successful agencies in the NHL, they 100% knew of any potential offer sheets. They're just playing it off as not knowing to the fan base to make it look like it came out of nowhere instead of management not taking it seriously and planning poorly for it.
It's not even surprising. Oilers management has been shit since the lockout. There's not a single thing this org does well besides win draft lotteries. If we didn't win the McDavid lottery there's zero doubt in my mind we're in the midst of a worse playoff drought than Buffalo.

People ask for average goaltending. Sure, how about average management?
 
Last edited:

McDNicks17

Moderator
Jul 1, 2010
42,838
33,287
Ontario
Holloway was also coming off a 7 point, 25 game Cup run. His 5 goals including the one below was tied for six on a team that came up one goal short of a Stanley Cup. Solid proof points for an age 22 who worked himself into line 2 playoff ice-time.


Oilers management complacency walked their two young talents to the exit door.
I'll ask you the same question. Can you find any examples of an RFA getting a ~$2M deal after their ELC?
 

Drivesaitl

Finding Hemingway
Oct 8, 2017
50,125
64,777
Islands in the stream.
Holloway was also coming off a 7 point, 25 game Cup run. His 5 goals including the one below was tied for six on a team that came up one goal short of a Stanley Cup. Solid proof points for an age 22 who worked himself into line 2 playoff ice-time.


Oilers management complacency walked their two young talents to the exit door.
The combination of chronically underplaying Bro and Holloway and then featuring them in playoffs in front of the largest audience possible (every GM in the league watching) and then getting caught pants down with offersheets after their two prospects performed impeccably, is Keystone cops stuff. Its like featuring the players in primetime just to maximize chances of stirring interest and losing them. With Bro particularly the usage was incredibly daft. I guess they didn't expect him to hit the ground running either, even though they needed him to. We left Bro off lineup for close to two seasons in favor of Desharnais who just straight up fill, and then we bring up Bro in playoffs. jfc.

I loved the contribution of Bro and Holloway in the playoffs but its asinine to do all of the above as the Oilers did.

For those not remembering the Holloway goal was a stud goal and with us down 3-2 in series and needing that game and Holloway going end t end scoring a highlight reel goal to stake out a huge 1-0 lead in that crucial game. They don't get bigger or better than that. How could any org sleep on that talent or have a fanbase mostly pretending the talent didn't exist. Its not inconceivable Holloway could even be a star player in prime.
 

Behind Enemy Lines

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
17,056
18,860
Vancouver
I'll ask you the same question. Can you find any examples of an RFA getting a ~$2M deal after their ELC?
Firstly, other teams have better managed their RFA's and mitigated vulnerability.

Holloway's camp offer was allegedly $1.3 million and Broberg's camp $1.8 so essentially 80% of one year of a Josh Brown 3 year deal. An active negotiation coming off team success and your young talent contributions to it and you manage cost certainty or enable contingency planning early in free agency to explore trade options. Work could even have been done before hitting July 1 showing good faith and belief in homegrown talent that helped your team's run. Jackson was an interventionist CEO right from his hiring to make organizational hires over Holland. I expect his background as a super agent and one who worked with Ferris for over a year to have clear pro-active plan to mitigate team vulnerability that was obvious to everyone and reported widely.

But when you fail to negotiate and prioritize your money elsewhere including day 1 #6-9 defensemen, then you are set for double jeopardy.

If you're going to use numbers to support your argument, at least use the full context. Holloway's playoff #'s and earned, improved ice-time are important considerations conveniently left out of your post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drivesaitl

McHelpus

Registered User
Jan 16, 2021
2,532
3,650
Holloway was also coming off a 7 point, 25 game Cup run. His 5 goals including the one below was tied for six on a team that came up one goal short of a Stanley Cup. Solid proof points for an age 22 who worked himself into line 2 playoff ice-time.


Oilers management complacency walked their two young talents to the exit door.
They needed to sign Jeff Skinner and Arvidsson! Because those players haven't been complete failures!
 

McDNicks17

Moderator
Jul 1, 2010
42,838
33,287
Ontario
Firstly, other teams have better managed their RFA's and mitigated vulnerability.

Holloway's camp offer was allegedly $1.3 million and Broberg's camp $1.8 so essentially 80% of one year of a Josh Brown 3 year deal. An active negotiation coming off team success and your young talent contributions to it and you manage cost certainty or enable contingency planning early in free agency to explore trade options. Work could even have been done before hitting July 1 showing good faith and belief in homegrown talent that helped your team's run. Jackson was an interventionist CEO right from his hiring to make organizational hires over Holland. I expect his background as a super agent and one who worked with Ferris for over a year to have clear pro-active plan to mitigate team vulnerability that was obvious to everyone and reported widely.

But when you fail to negotiate and prioritize your money elsewhere including day 1 #6-9 defensemen, then you are set for double jeopardy.
What is it with this thread and people going off on whacky tangents? haha

If your argument is they should have just simply signed Holloway, the least you can do is provide a few examples to show it wouldn't be a completely unprecedented contract.
 

Behind Enemy Lines

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
17,056
18,860
Vancouver
They needed to sign Jeff Skinner and Arvidsson! Because those players haven't been complete failures!
My issue is a lack of organization priority setting and pro-active relationship work done with two homegrown pedigree players that showed well in the team's deep playoff run. Move quickly to sign or understand if your flight risk and damaged relationship can be mended on the glow of a Cup run or have aggressive contingency planning lined up.

Reasonable albeit pricy bets of the two veteran forwards. But the tunnel vision on their free agency work left them significantly exposed with their future, homegrown guys.
 
Apr 12, 2010
75,724
34,864
Calgary
My issue is a lack of organization priority setting and pro-active relationship work done with two homegrown pedigree players that showed well in the team's deep playoff run. Move quickly to sign or understand if your flight risk and damaged relationship can be mended on the glow of a Cup run or have aggressive contingency planning lined up.

Reasonable albeit pricy bets of the two veteran forwards. But the tunnel vision on their free agency work left them significantly exposed with their future, homegrown guys.
Fact of the matter is they got blindsided because they just assumed that it wouldn't happen. Complete managerial incompetence and arrogance. They better make some damn good hay with those picks and I really don't trust them to do that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Behind Enemy Lines

Behind Enemy Lines

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
17,056
18,860
Vancouver
What is it with this thread and people going off on whacky tangents? haha

If your argument is they should have simply signed Holloway, the least you can do is provide a few examples to show it wouldn't be a completely unprecedented contract.
Make a complete argument if you want to make a point. That's my point. Holloway and Broberg both showed well in NHL playoff competition. There was management opportunity and time to prioritize their re-signing most certainly with a relationship that had been damaged. Edmonton's super agent CEO ignored all the signs and inactivity paid a big price.

The alleged difference in player asks was about $800,000 all in. If you meet the rather smaller salary differences with a long-term view of your homegrown talent and can't find common ground then you have clarity to explore trade options.

There was nothing stopping Jackson from actively negotiating with both players before even hitting free agency. Let alone waiting until the market reset player value on August 12 forcing a reactive, new plan that they are still left with roster holes to fill to get back to a deep playoff run. It's victim thinking to feel the Oilers were exploited and put over a barrel because they failed to work pro-actively on their at risk, team NHL playoff steeled young talent.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: harpoon

Behind Enemy Lines

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
17,056
18,860
Vancouver
Fact of the matter is they got blindsided because they just assumed that it wouldn't happen. Complete managerial incompetence and arrogance. They better make some damn good hay with those picks and I really don't trust them to do that.
I'm open minded to how they might fix their self-induced problem at the trade deadline. It can be done. But my eyes are wide open that they are under resourced in a market driven environment in which top 4 d-man are a valuable commodity. Holland was a market taker in his trade deadline work able to wait out early buyers paying premium. I'm not sure Jackson and Bowman have that luxury with minimal trade collateral relative to many organizations. They've walked themselves into a tightrope precarious situation compounded with a team that's less healthy nibbling into 'player to be named later' cap space.
 

McDNicks17

Moderator
Jul 1, 2010
42,838
33,287
Ontario
Make a complete argument if you want to make a point. That's my point. Holloway and Broberg both showed well in NHL playoff competition. There was management opportunity and time to prioritize their re-signing most certainly with a relationship that had been damaged. Edmonton's super agent CEO ignored all the signs and inactivity paid a big price.

The alleged difference in player asks was about $800,000 all in. If you meet the rather smaller salary differences with a long-term view of your homegrown talent and can't find common ground then you have clarity to explore trade options.

There was nothing stopping Jackson from actively negotiating with both players before even hitting free agency. Let alone waiting until the market reset player value on August 12 forcing a reactive, new plan that they are still left with roster holes to fill to get back to a deep playoff run. It's victim thinking to feel the Oilers were exploited and put over a barrel because they failed to work pro-actively on their at risk, team NHL playoff steeled young talent.
Holloway said they were upfront with the Oilers about the offer sheets coming. The Oilers knew about them. It came straight from Holloway's mouth. You can keep repeating that they had no idea, but it just isn't true.

The Oilers were always competing with the offer sheet numbers. The idea that the Oilers were going to sign them both to deals that were a combined ~$2.5M cheaper than the offer sheets using the power of friendship is just delusional.
 
  • Like
Reactions: harpoon and TB12

Canovin

1% is the new 11.5%
Oct 27, 2010
19,469
10,890
780
So much love for guys who wanted to play for St. Louis. I still think Jeff Skinner and Arvid are going to prove the Oilers right. Almost 3/4 of hockey left and 16 playoffs games
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM
Apr 12, 2010
75,724
34,864
Calgary
Make a complete argument if you want to make a point. That's my point. Holloway and Broberg both showed well in NHL playoff competition. There was management opportunity and time to prioritize their re-signing most certainly with a relationship that had been damaged. Edmonton's super agent CEO ignored all the signs and inactivity paid a big price.

The alleged difference in player asks was about $800,000 all in. If you meet the rather smaller salary differences with a long-term view of your homegrown talent and can't find common ground then you have clarity to explore trade options.

There was nothing stopping Jackson from actively negotiating with both players before even hitting free agency. Let alone waiting until the market reset player value on August 12 forcing a reactive, new plan that they are still left with roster holes to fill to get back to a deep playoff run. It's victim thinking to feel the Oilers were exploited and put over a barrel because they failed to work pro-actively on their at risk, team NHL playoff steeled young talent.
I think we as a fanbase are just so used to rotten management that even the bare minimum seems foreign. As you stated, they should've been proactive whether it was signing or trading the players instead of being exposed to the worst possible outcome. I've said it for years that this org is reactive rather than proactive. A proactive org wouldn't constantly try to solve the glaring holes in the lineup through free agency and instead take a good hard look at their abysmal draft record and try to improve it. While free agency can help, we've seen an endless cycle of dead weight float in and out of the bottom six and then trade the one drafted and developed bottom six forward we actually had for futures. Just abysmal asset management.

I'm open minded to how they might fix their self-induced problem at the trade deadline. It can be done. But my eyes are wide open that they are under resourced in a market driven environment in which top 4 d-man are a valuable commodity. Holland was a market taker in his trade deadline work able to wait out early buyers paying premium. I'm not sure Jackson and Bowman have that luxury with minimal trade collateral relative to many organizations. They've walked themselves into a tightrope precarious situation compounded with a team that's less healthy nibbling into 'player to be named later' cap space.
I'm definitely taking a wait and see approach but their track record speaks for itself. The pro scouting for the Oilers is utter garbage. For every Ekholm we have at least 3 Josh Browns.

Holloway said they were upfront with the Oilers about the offer sheets coming. The Oilers knew about them. It came straight from Holloway's mouth. You can keep repeating that they had no idea, but it just isn't true.

The Oilers were always competing with the offer sheet numbers. The idea that the Oilers were going to sign them both to deals that were a combined ~$2.5M cheaper than the offer sheets using the power of friendship is just delusional.
Then trade them. Simple as that. Ironically if true you're actually making management look even stupider.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Behind Enemy Lines

Frank the Tank

The Godfather
Aug 15, 2005
16,368
14,325
Chicago, IL
One knew the Oilers being shutout, Holloway with 1G-1A last night, and the Rutherford "please give me attention large fan base" Athletic article would provide plenty of fodder for this thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TB12

Behind Enemy Lines

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
17,056
18,860
Vancouver
Holloway said they were upfront with the Oilers about the offer sheets coming. The Oilers knew about them. It came straight from Holloway's mouth. You can keep repeating that they had no idea, but it just isn't true.

The Oilers were always competing with the offer sheet numbers. The idea that the Oilers were going to sign them both to deals that were a combined ~$2.5M cheaper than the offer sheets using the power of friendship is just delusional.
Delusional is missing all the signs. Even moreso if they were communicated directly to you by one of the flight risk players. Poor helpless Oilers management.
 

McDNicks17

Moderator
Jul 1, 2010
42,838
33,287
Ontario
Then trade them. Simple as that. Ironically if true you're actually making management look even stupider.
This has been covered in here 100 times and always ignored for the sake of continuing complaining.

STL was where Broberg wanted to go. They had the opportunity he wanted. They were an organization that really wanted him. He was going to make way more money on an offer sheet there than any extension anywhere else.

Any team trading for Broberg would be talking to his agent first. It's real easy for them to scare off anyone that isn't STL.

Broberg had full control where he was going.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TB12
Apr 12, 2010
75,724
34,864
Calgary
This has been covered in here 100 times and always ignored for the sake of continuing complaining.

STL was where Broberg wanted to go. They had the opportunity he wanted. They were an organization that really wanted him. He was going to make way more money on an offer sheet there than any extension anywhere else.

Any team trading for Broberg would be talking to his agent first. It's real easy for them to scare off anyone that isn't STL.

Broberg had full control where he was going.
So what? Trade him and let their management figure it out. If our management is that bloody useless then fire them all right this second. What are we paying Bowman/Jackson to do, exactly? Be strung around by Philip Broberg and Dylan Holloway?

There would also be nothing stopping said team from flipping him to STL if he didn't want to play there.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad