The Loss of Broberg and Holloway Gripe Thread

McJadeddog

Registered User
Sep 25, 2003
20,765
6,029
Regina, Saskatchewan
There is no chance in hell that Pod and Holloway finish the season with similar numbers as Holloway receives more opportunity in St. Louis.

Holloway should have been locked up but our management doubled down on the now by bringing in some old washed up wingers instead of ensuring that we continue to be a competitive team in the future.

Yeah agree on both counts. I like Podz, but he isn't nearly the offensive player Holloway is.

Holloway should have been extended rather than spending money on Skinner or Arvidsson. We could have signed just one of the above players and kept Holloway, and been a better team, with more youth, speed, and size. Terrible mistake by Jackson, but we can't do anything about it now.
 

McDNicks17

Moderator
Jul 1, 2010
42,789
33,171
Ontario
Right, but it didn't have to be that way had management not slept on it. We lost two valuable pieces for basically nothing as there isn't a chance in hell the draft picks they returned will turn into something as useful as them.
Agreed on Holloway. I was very anti-Skinner when the rumours started.

Not so much on Broberg. The horse has been beaten enough, but he was as good as gone. He wanted out and controlled his fate.
 

Trafalgar Sadge Law

Registered User
Nov 8, 2007
11,548
7,043
Meh. Pod and Emberson show how easy it is to add a little youth every year when you don't have a hibernating GM.
I think most Oilers fans are pretty happy about adding Pod/Emberson though, and we picked up another highly touted prospect that we'll wait and see on the returns for in Savoie. Acquiring youth is not the issue. The issue is that we should've added Pod and Emberson ON TOP OF Holloway and Broberg. You can't tell me you wouldn't be intrigued about the idea of Podkolzin and Holloway both out there speeding into the tough areas, crashing and banging, digging up loose pucks etc. Instead we have over 10 million in slow and/or ineffective, declining forwards like Henrique/Arvidsson/Skinner.

Also since he's not much older than Holloway/Broberg, Adam Henrique is a downgrade from Ryan McLeod. Should've just never traded for Henrique and flipped that 1st for Matthew Savoie instead.
 

McShogun99

Registered User
Aug 30, 2009
18,854
15,547
Edmonton
It would be nice to have Holloway instead of Skinner, but I'm still not too bothered.

Holloway would only be playing 5v5 here and he's tied with Janmark for 5v5 points. Not the greatest loss.
Skinner will come around. This is the first time in his NHL career that he's played on a good team and has to be defensively responsible with minimal PP time.

I think most Oilers fans are pretty happy about adding Pod/Emberson though, and we picked up another highly touted prospect that we'll wait and see on the returns for in Savoie. Acquiring youth is not the issue. The issue is that we should've added Pod and Emberson ON TOP OF Holloway and Broberg. You can't tell me you wouldn't be intrigued about the idea of Podkolzin and Holloway both out there speeding into the tough areas, crashing and banging, digging up loose pucks etc. Instead we have over 10 million in slow and/or ineffective, declining forwards like Henrique/Arvidsson/Skinner.

Also since he's not much older than Holloway/Broberg, Adam Henrique is a downgrade from Ryan McLeod. Should've just never traded for Henrique and flipped that 1st for Matthew Savoie instead.
Pod and Emberson have been growing on me over the season. We potentially got two good ones for practically nothing.
 

McDNicks17

Moderator
Jul 1, 2010
42,789
33,171
Ontario
I think most Oilers fans are pretty happy about adding Pod/Emberson though, and we picked up another highly touted prospect that we'll wait and see on the returns for in Savoie. Acquiring youth is not the issue. The issue is that we should've added Pod and Emberson ON TOP OF Holloway and Broberg. You can't tell me you wouldn't be intrigued about the idea of Podkolzin and Holloway both out there speeding into the tough areas, crashing and banging, digging up loose pucks etc. Instead we have over 10 million in slow and/or ineffective, declining forwards like Henrique/Arvidsson/Skinner.

Also since he's not much older than Holloway/Broberg, Adam Henrique is a downgrade from Ryan McLeod. Should've just never traded for Henrique and flipped that 1st for Matthew Savoie instead.
I don't know if those moves happen if they keep them.

To fit Broberg, Ceci and Kulak would have had to be traded. I'm not sure they would have targeted a RD like Emberson if that happens.

They'd also have to run a 20 man roster, so no spares and one less spot at LW means they probably don't trade for Pod.
 

Trafalgar Sadge Law

Registered User
Nov 8, 2007
11,548
7,043
I don't know if those moves happen if they keep them.

To fit Broberg, Ceci and Kulak would have had to be traded. I'm not sure they would have targeted a RD like Emberson if that happens.

They'd also have to run a 20 man roster, so no spares and one less spot at LW means they probably don't trade for Pod.
I'm 100% sure we could've fit everyone by just not signing 2 of Arvidsson/Henrique/Skinner (especially not Skinner). Also, keeping Broberg would've made it more likely that we make that Ceci for Emberson trade anyway to retain a cheap righty. Sigh... too late now, the losses of Holloway/Broberg were more reflective of the team's tactical errors than anything else: prioritizing declining vets early in free agency over our own homegrown young talent. And it's not like Jeff Jackson didn't know the importance of these two either. In multiple offseason interviews, he talked about the importance of acquiring/re-signing and developing young players for long-term sustainability with those two as his primary examples. We just messed up in execution by signing the 10.5 million dollar trio of suck.
 
Apr 12, 2010
75,469
34,681
Calgary
I'm 100% sure we could've fit everyone by just not signing 2 of Arvidsson/Henrique/Skinner (especially not Skinner). Also, keeping Broberg would've made it more likely that we make that Ceci for Emberson trade anyway to retain a cheap righty. Sigh... too late now, the losses of Holloway/Broberg were more reflective of the team's tactical errors than anything else: prioritizing declining vets early in free agency over our own homegrown young talent. And it's not like Jeff Jackson didn't know the importance of these two either. In multiple offseason interviews, he talked about the importance of acquiring/re-signing and developing young players for long-term sustainability with those two as his primary examples. We just messed up in execution by signing the 10.5 million dollar trio of suck.
You might need to update your avatar. I'm sure there's a Jackson quote that's memeworthy after we lost two valuable young players for jack squat.
 

McDNicks17

Moderator
Jul 1, 2010
42,789
33,171
Ontario
I'm 100% sure we could've fit everyone by just not signing 2 of Arvidsson/Henrique/Skinner (especially not Skinner). Also, keeping Broberg would've made it more likely that we make that Ceci for Emberson trade anyway to retain a cheap righty. Sigh... too late now, the losses of Holloway/Broberg were more reflective of the team's tactical errors than anything else: prioritizing declining vets early in free agency over our own homegrown young talent. And it's not like Jeff Jackson didn't know the importance of these two either. In multiple offseason interviews, he talked about the importance of acquiring/re-signing and developing young players for long-term sustainability with those two as his primary examples. We just messed up in execution by signing the 10.5 million dollar trio of suck.
I don't think it's as simple as not signing those guys unless we're talking just not sign Skinner and keep Holloway which I think they should have done. They had to do something with the second line. With hindsight we could see Holloway or Pod filling in there, but both of them were far from top6 locks going into the season. For Henrique, you either have McLeod making basically the same money in his spot or you skip that and have Derek Ryan as your #3C.

And like I said before, Broberg was as good as gone. He demanded a trade. He had an offer sheet secured before even negotiating with the Oilers. He wasn't re-signing.
 

Trafalgar Sadge Law

Registered User
Nov 8, 2007
11,548
7,043
I don't think it's as simple as not signing those guys unless we're talking just not sign Skinner and keep Holloway which I think they should have done. They had to do something with the second line. With hindsight we could see Holloway or Pod filling in there, but both of them were far from top6 locks going into the season. For Henrique, you either have McLeod making basically the same money in his spot or you skip that and have Derek Ryan as your #3C.

And like I said before, Broberg was as good as gone. He demanded a trade. He had an offer sheet secured before even negotiating with the Oilers. He wasn't re-signing.
Yeah I'm saying to not sign 2 of the 10.5 million trio and keeping the young players and seems you're in agreement about the Holloway part. As for McLeod, he's 1 million cheaper against the cap than Henrique, younger, and just a much better player. Much faster, vastly superior defensively and on the penalty kill, and what was supposed to be Henrique's advantage: offense, doesn't seem to be working out either. McLeod was always good in transition for puck possession/zone entries etc while driving play on the third line, and could fill in for spot duty as a complimentary top 6 winger when injuries arose. Henrique just does nothing (though the same can be said about most of our forwards this year).

Honestly, the mistake with Broberg likely already happened last season when we kept jerking him between the NHL bench and AHL even after he had solid 2022-23 campaign on the bottom pair. Hence the trade request rumours.
 

VeteranPresence

Registered User
Aug 13, 2024
502
849
Ex-Oilers forward cites stars Connor McDavid, Leon Draisaitl's team roles as primary reason for exiting Edmonton

Didn't know where else to put this but since we're already talking about him here- Foegele told an LA reporter that the reason "he" left Edmonton this summer was because it's "hard to get on the ice" here. No mention of it not being his choice, nor of how big of an ego you must need to believe you should be a top-two forward on an NHL club with a career high of *checks notes* 13 goals before coming to the Oilers.

Foegele comes off as extremely ungrateful in this quote, especially given he set career highs in every category thanks to McDrai which likely fed into even getting his new contract. Good luck keeping LA's first round exit streak going, bud. We won't and don't miss you.
 

McDNicks17

Moderator
Jul 1, 2010
42,789
33,171
Ontario
Yeah I'm saying to not sign 2 of the 10.5 million trio and keeping the young players and seems you're in agreement about the Holloway part. As for McLeod, he's 1 million cheaper against the cap than Henrique, younger, and just a much better player. Much faster, vastly superior defensively and on the penalty kill, and what was supposed to be Henrique's advantage: offense, doesn't seem to be working out either. McLeod was always good in transition for puck possession/zone entries etc while driving play on the third line, and could fill in for spot duty as a complimentary top 6 winger when injuries arose. Henrique just does nothing (though the same can be said about most of our forwards this year).

Honestly, the mistake with Broberg likely already happened last season when we kept jerking him between the NHL bench and AHL even after he had solid 2022-23 campaign on the bottom pair. Hence the trade request rumours.
Henrique has been good lately and I'd easily take him over McLeod in the playoffs.

I don't think the cap works unless it's Arvidsson not being signed too. That's $3.9M in saving without Skinner and swapping McLeod in for Henrique compared to the $6.8M you would need for Broberg/Holloway.
 

McDNicks17

Moderator
Jul 1, 2010
42,789
33,171
Ontario
Ex-Oilers forward cites stars Connor McDavid, Leon Draisaitl's team roles as primary reason for exiting Edmonton

Didn't know where else to put this but since we're already talking about him here- Foegele told an LA reporter that the reason "he" left Edmonton this summer was because it's "hard to get on the ice" here. No mention of it not being his choice, nor of how big of an ego you must need to believe you should be a top-two forward on an NHL club with a career high of *checks notes* 13 goals before coming to the Oilers.

Foegele comes off as extremely ungrateful in this quote, especially given he set career highs in every category thanks to McDrai which likely fed into even getting his new contract. Good luck keeping LA's first round exit streak going, bud. We won't and don't miss you.

That's pretty funny. Foegele probably would have been bought out if it wasn't for Drai juicing his numbers for 10-15 games every season.
 

Mcnotloilersfan

I'm here, I'm bored
Jul 11, 2010
11,332
5,581
Niagara
Ex-Oilers forward cites stars Connor McDavid, Leon Draisaitl's team roles as primary reason for exiting Edmonton

Didn't know where else to put this but since we're already talking about him here- Foegele told an LA reporter that the reason "he" left Edmonton this summer was because it's "hard to get on the ice" here. No mention of it not being his choice, nor of how big of an ego you must need to believe you should be a top-two forward on an NHL club with a career high of *checks notes* 13 goals before coming to the Oilers.

Foegele comes off as extremely ungrateful in this quote, especially given he set career highs in every category thanks to McDrai which likely fed into even getting his new contract. Good luck keeping LA's first round exit streak going, bud. We won't and don't miss you.
What an idiotic take on his part. He isn't a center... They didn't take an ounce of ice time away from him.
 

Trafalgar Sadge Law

Registered User
Nov 8, 2007
11,548
7,043
Ex-Oilers forward cites stars Connor McDavid, Leon Draisaitl's team roles as primary reason for exiting Edmonton

Didn't know where else to put this but since we're already talking about him here- Foegele told an LA reporter that the reason "he" left Edmonton this summer was because it's "hard to get on the ice" here. No mention of it not being his choice, nor of how big of an ego you must need to believe you should be a top-two forward on an NHL club with a career high of *checks notes* 13 goals before coming to the Oilers.

Foegele comes off as extremely ungrateful in this quote, especially given he set career highs in every category thanks to McDrai which likely fed into even getting his new contract. Good luck keeping LA's first round exit streak going, bud. We won't and don't miss you.
Bro was often struggling to outplay the likes of Kailer Yamamoto and thinks McDrai are the reason for his low ice time haha.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad