ok i made a simple mistake, lets me assume that the word i wanted to use is season in this disastrous season??here is a question, lets assume that Darling is on the team, will the Bhawks still be having a this disastrous system ?? even with the performance that Darling is having this season ??
ok i made a simple mistake, lets me assume that the word i wanted to use is season in this disastrous season??
would the presence of Darling have change this season ??
ref the bold, excellent. many thanks needed that this morning.Yes, with how he has played this season, the Hawks would be a sure thing for Dahlin.
Jokes aside, it's obvious Darling has had a really, really, really bad season. If he's here, it's hard to say if he would still have that bad season. But if he did, then it doesn't change anything other than giving us a better pick.
I still think that Darling can absolutely bounce back, but the fact is that given his season we shouldn't be amping for him to return even if the Canes are willing to half retain.
Darling makes one hell of a save in Edmonton, then Bennett swats the puck mid air and puck bounced off Darlings ass and in the net....just not his year
The PO's start in a few weeks. Then we will see if AP can be a factor. He wasn't in Chicago.Panarin with 4 points tonight...but at least Q found someone to carry Toews...it just too bad his name is Patrick Kane
The way he's getting talked about makes even if you move Seabs it's still a worry adding a greater value of what Panarin will cost. This team already has to fit too many cheap elcs or high end deals.
Panarin has been hot lately, kinda hot the last 2 regular season finishes too, but before it CBJ wasn't so certain for a playoff spot as they seem now. He's helped them in that regard but for both clubs these need to benefit them long term
not sure anyone ever said that - I think we all said it sucked to lose him, but were hoping to get a 25g 25a Saad back who could play better defense and help out Toews with the loss of Hossa. That hasn't happened obviously and Panarin had a rough few month stretch as well to only really come on the past 6 weeks. Panarin is good, no damn doubt about it, wish we had him but f*** it can't look back nowPanarin 3g/1a
68pts in 74gp.
Product of Kane?
The PO's start in a few weeks. Then we will see if AP can be a factor. He wasn't in Chicago.
Ladies?
not sure anyone ever said that - I think we all said it sucked to lose him, but were hoping to get a 25g 25a Saad back who could play better defense and help out Toews with the loss of Hossa. That hasn't happened obviously and Panarin had a rough few month stretch as well to only really come on the past 6 weeks. Panarin is good, no damn doubt about it, wish we had him but **** it can't look back now
not sure anyone ever said that - I think we all said it sucked to lose him, but were hoping to get a 25g 25a Saad back who could play better defense and help out Toews with the loss of Hossa. That hasn't happened obviously and Panarin had a rough few month stretch as well to only really come on the past 6 weeks. Panarin is good, no damn doubt about it, wish we had him but **** it can't look back now
Go look at the trade thread, a lot of HF experts liked that trade, if not by page one then by page ten they were all saying "I kinda like that trade now, makes the team more balanced, gets Toews going, etc"
And yes many said that Panarin's production will go down without Kane...
What an absolutely pathetic trade by a pathetic useless clueless GM
he wasnt scoring much goals for a few months, getting mainly assists/power play points - him and Saad weren't that far off in points for a good stretchPanarin has 52 points in 49 games since December 1st, and he's 25 points in 22 games during the past 6 weeks, so it's not just a few weeks.