we should've kept Blackwell. Looked good in just about every game he played in.
Guess you didn't follow my posts last season. I've been boycotting the team since they traded Panarin and only came back into the fold last year because they made amends and got me Bedard.Guess you didn't watch 22-23 season. He was awful
Better last year but he is a dime a dozen 4th liner
Why? Most of them shouldn't have been Hawks, either. They're all AHL level talent.Sad to see so many ex-Hawks being waived all over the league.
PUT BRODIE ON WAIVERS
Boycotted the team?? You missed Kane and Toews last years in Chicago all because they traded Panarin. Seems a bit rashGuess you didn't follow my posts last season. I've been boycotting the team since they traded Panarin and only came back into the fold last year because they made amends and got me Bedard.
So you guessed right, I didn't watch the 22-23 season, but he stood out last season amongst our 4th liners.
Hopefully, you weren't insinuating that Hawks should pick up IM off of waivers.PUT BRODIE ON WAIVERS
IT'S TIME TO MAKE SOME ROOM
He didn't insinuate it, he outright said it.Hopefully, you weren't insinuating that Hawks should pick up IM off of waivers.
Boycotted the team?? You missed Kane and Toews last years in Chicago all because they traded Panarin. Seems a bit rash
Even bad hockey is still hockey.I'm pretty harsh with my personal boycotts. Looking back, it looks like I didn't miss much skipping 17-18 till last year.
You missed Blackhawks legends Brandon Hagel and Marc-Andre Fleury.I'm pretty harsh with my personal boycotts. Looking back, it looks like I didn't miss much skipping 17-18 till last year.
Legitimately insane that you missed the DeBrincat eraI'm pretty harsh with my personal boycotts. Looking back, it looks like I didn't miss much skipping 17-18 till last year.
Wait did mitchell clear or is he on waivers?
He's on waivers.Wait did mitchell clear or is he on waivers?
That was a joke about him being too small.He's on waivers.
Don't worry, we can still claim him.
Hopefully, you weren't insinuating that Hawks should pick up IM off of waivers.
LOL ... I liked that Mitchell was finally put on waivers, not the insinuation that Hawks should claim him. He was never a legit NHLer.
I still remember the game in overtime where he entered the offensive zone with the puck, stopped and waited until the other team swarmed him, took the puck from him and promptly scored.LOL ... I liked that Mitchell was finally put on waivers, not the insinuation that Hawks should claim him. He was never a legit NHLer.
Lets try this again. I quoted the following, which I agree with:He didn't insinuate it, he outright said it.
And you gave it a like.
The reason Musto said the Hawks should put Brodie on waivers was because he wanted the Hawks to pluck Mitchell off waivers. That should be obvious.Lets try this again. I quoted the following, which I agree with:
PUT BRODIE ON WAIVERS
IT'S TIME TO MAKE SOME ROOM