Also I'm fairly confident the OHL has historically been a lower scoring league than the WHL but I don't have the willpower to get the data.Being the marginally more productive prospect does not make him the better prospect.
I can't believe this has to be explained.
Career numbers are meaningless, especially when one guy played a much larger proportion of his junior career.
I think it's typically the opposite, but this year scoring is way up in the WHL, especially among the top scorers.Also I'm fairly confident the OHL has historically been a lower scoring league than the WHL but I don't have the willpower to get the data.
Well in any case. As a fan of the team with the best odds at Bedard I feel fairly confident saying he's not the same level of prospect as McDavid. If the Ducks got him I'd be thrilled if he ended up as a 100-115 point player. There's more to prospects than just production.I think it's typically the opposite, but this year scoring is way up in the WHL, especially among the top scorers.
A very quick and easy to accomplish calculation:I think it's typically the opposite, but this year scoring is way up in the WHL, especially among the top scorers.
Personally, even if the risk factor is low, I'd call it that Fantilli or Carlsson are clearly a safer bet. Even without the present extenuating circumstances you have the greater than zero chance that a KHL player simply won't want to come over. The Devils, Knights, and Lightning made up a trip of teams that waited 7 years for Nikita Gusev to come over. Michkov you have to wait another 3 just for that contract to expire.Before all the War stuff with Russia etc. Bedard and Michkov were considered closer to 1A/1B than 1st and distant 4th, since then Michkov has done nothing but kept performing at a high level agains tougher competition and suddenly he is ”clearly” behind not only Bedard but also Fantilli and Carlson? Why?
Thanks. Happy to admit I'm wrong. Might be that I just mentally compared the top scorers from both leagues in the wrong years and formed and incorrect assumption.A very quick and easy to accomplish calculation:
2014-2015 OHL season - 7.01 GPG
2022-2023 WHL season - 6.95 GPG
Its not a perfect stat obviously as there are many factors that contribute (ie. strength of league) but i just thought it was worth presenting since it was easy to quickly calculate!Thanks. Happy to admit I'm wrong. Might be that I just mentally compared the top scorers from both leagues in the wrong years and formed and incorrect assumption.
Either way, I don't think the disparity in production between McDavid and Bedard is sufficient to say that the latter is the better pre-NHL prospect. As much as I'd like that to be the case if it benefitted my team.
Before all the War stuff with Russia etc. Bedard and Michkov were considered closer to 1A/1B than 1st and distant 4th, since then Michkov has done nothing but kept performing at a high level agains tougher competition and suddenly he is ”clearly” behind not only Bedard but also Fantilli and Carlson? Why?
When was he last measured?Size and skating. Michkov isn't much bigger than he was back then and not much better as a skater. Bedard has gotten a lot stronger as a skater and has filled out. I watched every bit of Sochi I could and Michkov looked like a slow version of Johnny Gaudreau.
If he actually measures up at 5'10 170+ (which he is listed at in some places) I would be surprised and more confident in his NHL projection. My guess is that he's actually more like 5'8 160. Call me a dinosaur scout if you want but I'll take the 6'3 #1C.
My comparisons are Fantilli = Dubois and Carlsson = Boldy.
I’ll trade Dubois and Boldy for Kucherov all day. It’s close.
Before all the War stuff with Russia etc. Bedard and Michkov were considered closer to 1A/1B than 1st and distant 4th, since then Michkov has done nothing but kept performing at a high level agains tougher competition and suddenly he is ”clearly” behind not only Bedard but also Fantilli and Carlson? Why?
Bedards shot is the more then productionWell in any case. As a fan of the team with the best odds at Bedard I feel fairly confident saying he's not the same level of prospect as McDavid. If the Ducks got him I'd be thrilled if he ended up as a 100-115 point player. There's more to prospects than just production.
And he's only gonna get stronger with that shot. Idk if it's better than Matthews or not, but if it is, idk how you could stop that as a goalie.Bedards shot is the more then production
He has the it factor when he shoots similar to mcdavid on rushes as a prospect
I dont see Bedard being less then a 100 pt player at minimum
His ceiling is to be a perennial ross/hart/libdsay/rocket challnger like 97
I am not saying Bedard is better prospect but while McDavid has clearly more speed, it is also clear who has the better shot and demonstrated better clutch play in their respective jr career.Bedard is not a better prospect than McDavid. McDavid's speed alone puts him in a different tier.
This is probably best case scenario for each player but Bedard should be slightly ahead as he almost certainly is the best bet to attain his best case.The gap is pretty clear between Bedard and those two. But somewhere in between those three is Michkov. That gap isn't as big as most people think.
Bedard
Michkov
Fantilli
Carlsson
Shots age well, speed doesn‘t.