Like I said, the two outcomes of the review were obvious. If they uphold the play on the ice, it's a dead puck. If they see that Carlo did touch the puck with his broken stick (he did), then the play should have been blown dead then and Carlo should have gotten 2 minutes. In a fair reading of the rulebook, those are the only two options.
Instead, the NHL called in and said that Carlo touching the puck with his stick was a penalty, but at the same time didn't count as touching the puck enough to get a penalty whistle. The puck then rolls under Woll, who falls on it, and apparently that doesn't count as touching the puck either, so when the Panthers shove Woll into the net, THAT counts as crossing the line and it's a goal. It requires Carlo both touching and not touching the puck at the same time on the same play.
If they're willing to break the rules so obviously to give Florida a comeback goal in a game where they were on their heels, how are the Leafs expected to win at all? What next, letting Bennett puck the puck up with his glove throw it in the net?
It's also the result of another thing that has always bugged me watchin the Leafs play; why is it when their opponent's goalie drops on the puck, it's an immediate whistle, but when the Leafs goalie drops on the puck, the refs give the other team an extra 5 or so seconds to hack at it and try to pull it back out? Do any other teams take as much goalie abuse as the Leafs do? Because I highly doubt it.