GDT: - The BwO Presents: Leafs vs Panthers - The Game Before Game 7 - 8pm EDT SN | Page 10 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

GDT: The BwO Presents: Leafs vs Panthers - The Game Before Game 7 - 8pm EDT SN

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why the f*** would he care who we are playing in the final? It's not like he takes that into consideration when predicting the Leafs to always win. We could be playing the Canadoan Olympic team, down 4-0 heading into the 3rd and he'd predict a 5-4 Leafs win.

I don't think he actually believes what he says.
to be fair he did seem more reserved about beating whoever he thinks would win the west than he did beating Carolina and Florida, which in its own way shows more objectivity than you'd usually get outta the guy
 
  • Like
Reactions: All Mod Cons
That's one thing that's driven me crazy these past two games. The artsfy-fartsy shit. Trying for the perfect goal.

Look at the early games in this series, and in particular, Game 3. We scored by throwing pucks at the net, screening Bob, getting in his grill or banging in a rebound.

It's playoff hockey. Throw pucks at the net. Don't let him see. Why we got away from that is so f***ing frustrating.
problem is 34 and 16 are in capable of doing that. They wan the fancy plays and tsn highlight of the night goal for you tube.

Throw the puck on net and let 23 tip or crash the crease and bang in a 1 foot rebound.

Score 5 goals tonight with the avg shot distance of 2 feet from the goal line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Just Rude
Bobrovsky is shutting the leafs out tonight.

The season is over. Get it over with already.
 
really interesting catch. Never crossed my mind. I would be curious what the ruling would be in a situation like this based on the rule book. If they didn't blow the whistle originally but the defending team got away with an illegal play before the attacking team scored. Did anyone on the SN/ESPN panel discuss this?
Like I said, the two outcomes of the review were obvious. If they uphold the play on the ice, it's a dead puck. If they see that Carlo did touch the puck with his broken stick (he did), then the play should have been blown dead then and Carlo should have gotten 2 minutes. In a fair reading of the rulebook, those are the only two options.

Instead, the NHL called in and said that Carlo touching the puck with his stick was a penalty, but at the same time didn't count as touching the puck enough to get a penalty whistle. The puck then rolls under Woll, who falls on it, and apparently that doesn't count as touching the puck either, so when the Panthers shove Woll into the net, THAT counts as crossing the line and it's a goal. It requires Carlo both touching and not touching the puck at the same time on the same play.

If they're willing to break the rules so obviously to give Florida a comeback goal in a game where they were on their heels, how are the Leafs expected to win at all? What next, letting Bennett puck the puck up with his glove throw it in the net?

It's also the result of another thing that has always bugged me watchin the Leafs play; why is it when their opponent's goalie drops on the puck, it's an immediate whistle, but when the Leafs goalie drops on the puck, the refs give the other team an extra 5 or so seconds to hack at it and try to pull it back out? Do any other teams take as much goalie abuse as the Leafs do? Because I highly doubt it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: leafs in five
to be fair he did seem more reserved about beating whoever he thinks would win the west than he did beating Carolina and Florida, which in its own way shows more objectivity than you'd usually get outta the guy
You silly gooses (or maybe geese?). My opinion has always been the same. The Leafs will be in the Cup final this season. I thought Vegas would also be there, and that was the team I was concerned about. Winnipeg and Dallas don't worry me. Edmonton is an interesting one. I didn't expect to see them do what they did in the last two games against Vegas. As much as it pains me to say it, I could actually see Edmonton beating the Leafs in the Cup final if they play like they did in those two games against Vegas. Draisitl became a defensive player? Never would have expected it.
 
Knies Matthews Domi
Laughton Tavares Nylander
McMann Holmberg Marner
Lorentz Kampf Patches

Get it done.
 
Can we please be on the right side of a comeback choke for once. I just want to see T Chuk's smug grin disappear into tears. Him and Brady can compare notes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fahad203
Feels like if they score first, they may have a chance.

If they are chasing the game, I feel FLA will be able to lock it down again.
Statistically speaking, the team that scores first is in a better spot. The concern is emotionally, how do they react and play if they don't?

Genuine question, have they won a playoff game when not scoring first in the Matthews era?
 
  • Like
Reactions: wingman75
Statistically speaking, the team that scores first is in a better spot. The concern is emotionally, how do they react and play if they don't?

Genuine question, have they won a playoff game when not scoring first in the Matthews era?
normal stats don't work on this team:
teams who go up 2-0 have like a 80%+ chance of winning
teams who go up 3-1 have like a 95% chance of winning
the pp in elimination games
the game 7 record
the core 4 production
yada yada yada it's not norma

as for the question, yes and the last time we did it was game 3 against ottawa where giroux scored first
 
Because the result of one game has no bearing or impact on the result of the next game. The Leafs will win tonight.
The biggest game of the series will be game 7.
1624224939713.gif
 
Like I said, the two outcomes of the review were obvious. If they uphold the play on the ice, it's a dead puck. If they see that Carlo did touch the puck with his broken stick (he did), then the play should have been blown dead then and Carlo should have gotten 2 minutes. In a fair reading of the rulebook, those are the only two options.

Instead, the NHL called in and said that Carlo touching the puck with his stick was a penalty, but at the same time didn't count as touching the puck enough to get a penalty whistle. The puck then rolls under Woll, who falls on it, and apparently that doesn't count as touching the puck either, so when the Panthers shove Woll into the net, THAT counts as crossing the line and it's a goal. It requires Carlo both touching and not touching the puck at the same time on the same play.

If they're willing to break the rules so obviously to give Florida a comeback goal in a game where they were on their heels, how are the Leafs expected to win at all? What next, letting Bennett puck the puck up with his glove throw it in the net?

It's also the result of another thing that has always bugged me watchin the Leafs play; why is it when their opponent's goalie drops on the puck, it's an immediate whistle, but when the Leafs goalie drops on the puck, the refs give the other team an extra 5 or so seconds to hack at it and try to pull it back out? Do any other teams take as much goalie abuse as the Leafs do? Because I highly doubt it.
I would like to see what the official nhl rulebook says on if there is a missed penalty that would have been taken by the defending team before a goal is scored that is then reviewed for crossing the line. These rules can be pretty specific but I wonder if the book even has a ruling for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seventieslord
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Ad

Ad