Speculation: The Bruins and Jeremy Swayman are far apart in contract term (length) and dollar amount.

Status
Not open for further replies.

AHLdepth

Registered User
Feb 17, 2020
648
907
Prime example of a guy that might want to go short, wait for the cap to boom, and then cash in big. Might have an agent talking around about how Florida is now an example of a team that got it done with a big price goaltender......all of this to say it's the Bruins so he'll sign a 7 @5.8 and we'll all fight back tears
 

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
3,450
2,986
Prime example of a guy that might want to go short, wait for the cap to boom, and then cash in big. Might have an agent talking around about how Florida is now an example of a team that got it done with a big price goaltender......all of this to say it's the Bruins so he'll sign a 7 @5.8 and we'll all fight back tears
Goalies should always go for term.
 

frightenedinmatenum2

Registered User
Sep 30, 2023
2,868
3,192
Orange County Prison
Here's what I assume happened

Sweeney and Swayman's agent had the framework of an extension worked out before the draft and shook on it, saying they'd hammer out the details later. That gave Sweeney assurance to trade Ullmark before the draft and make the moves in free agency he did. Then afterwards he circled back and Swayman & his agent go SIKE, now that you don't have Ullmark we have all the leverage and the ask on years and/or AAV went up.

I doubt this happened.

They needed to trade Ullmark, because Swayman was their guy. They did not have the luxury to hold on to Ullmark, because the market for him was limited. Had they waited to move him, Ottawa could have moved on. The fact that Boston only got a late 1st while having to take Korpisalo should show you how limited their leverage already was.

Not to mention, Ullmark could have added Ottawa to his trade list on July 1st. This would have given him and his agent complete control over the situation, because they could have said we only want to go to Ottawa with an above market-value extension in place, or we want to play out the season in Boston and won't waive for the 1-2 teams we know wanted Ullmark that we now added to our list.

Ullmark apparently did not have Ottawa on his list because with Ottawa adding Korpisalo last year, burning a spot on Ottawa didn't make sense. That isn't to say he was upset about going to Ottawa, but it would only be logical to assume that he would add Ottawa to his list on July 1st because it would only further add to his leverage.

The short of it is that they had to move Ullmark when they did. They chose Swayman, and the market for Ullmark was limited and challenging.
 

Nogatco Rd

Pierre-Luc Dubas
Apr 3, 2021
2,849
5,345
Here's what I assume happened

Sweeney and Swayman's agent had the framework of an extension worked out before the draft and shook on it, saying they'd hammer out the details later. That gave Sweeney assurance to trade Ullmark before the draft and make the moves in free agency he did. Then afterwards he circled back and Swayman & his agent go SIKE, now that you don't have Ullmark we have all the leverage and the ask on years and/or AAV went up.
I think it’s more complex than that.

First of all, to understand what happened to Swayman, you gotta understand who Swayman the goalie WAS. Now Swayman was born to a three-legged bitch of a mother. And he was always ashamed of this. And then right after that, he's adopted by this man, Tito Liebowitz. He's a small-time gunrunner and goalie fight promoter. So he puts Swayman into training, next thing you know… Swayman’s GOOD! He is DAMN good!

But then, he had the fight of his life. They pit him against his brother Ullmark. And Swayman said, "No, man, that's my brother, I can't fight Ullmark!" And he made him fight anyway. And then Swayman… killed Ullmark. And Swayman said, "That's it!!!" And he called off all his fights, and he started doing crack, and he ffffffffFREAKED OUT. And then in a rage, he collapsed, and his heart... no longer beat. Wow.
 

Ivo

Registered User
Dec 29, 2008
3,048
2,975
Rotterdam, NL
I hope Montreal offer sheets him at like 10; Bruins match . Everyone loses
2 firsts, a second and a third from a bad team sound like a decent compensation for a goalie. Might be just what the Bruins need to restock for another successful run. Of course, after trading Ullmark, the season would be a tough one without Swayman.
 

Jeune Poulet

Registered User
Oct 31, 2019
1,899
4,514
Broberg got that amount because it was the highest salary possible with a low compensation.

To sign Swayman a team is going to have to give up their next 4 1st rounders.
Lol. No.

Swayman is not getting a $11,452,295 contract offer. That's what it takes to get four 1st rounders.

The offers he would be most likely be receiving are in the $6,871,374 - $9,161,834 bracket, which has one 1st-round picks, one 2nd-round pick and one 3rd-round pick compensation.
 
Last edited:

Clint Eastwood

Eff the Habs
Nov 11, 2018
5,735
10,764
Chili's
Lol. No.

Swayman is not getting a $11,452,295 contract offer. That's what it takes to get four 1st rounders.

The offers he would be most likely be receiving are in the $6,871,374 - $9,161,834 bracket, which has one 1st-round picks, one 2nd-round pick and one 3rd-round pick compensation.

And who has the cap space, the need for a starting goalie, and enough confidence that their 1st won't be a lottery pick to make that kind of offer?
 
  • Like
Reactions: violaswallet

wintersej

Registered User
Nov 26, 2011
23,172
18,937
North Andover, MA
Lol. No.

Swayman is not getting a $11,452,295 contract offer. That's what it takes to get four 1st rounders.

The offers he would be most likely be receiving are in the $6,871,374 - $9,161,834 bracket, which has one 1st-round picks, one 2nd-round pick and one 3rd-round pick compensation.

Which are offers the Bruins would match. That was his point. The Bruins have a 8.6 in space available and can make it 9.6 by sending down Max Jones and running 13 forwards and 7 D.
 

Hale The Villain

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 2, 2008
26,744
15,287
I doubt this happened.

They needed to trade Ullmark, because Swayman was their guy. They did not have the luxury to hold on to Ullmark, because the market for him was limited. Had they waited to move him, Ottawa could have moved on. The fact that Boston only got a late 1st while having to take Korpisalo should show you how limited their leverage already was.

Not to mention, Ullmark could have added Ottawa to his trade list on July 1st. This would have given him and his agent complete control over the situation, because they could have said we only want to go to Ottawa with an above market-value extension in place, or we want to play out the season in Boston and won't waive for the 1-2 teams we know wanted Ullmark that we now added to our list.

Ullmark apparently did not have Ottawa on his list because with Ottawa adding Korpisalo last year, burning a spot on Ottawa didn't make sense. That isn't to say he was upset about going to Ottawa, but it would only be logical to assume that he would add Ottawa to his list on July 1st because it would only further add to his leverage.

The short of it is that they had to move Ullmark when they did. They chose Swayman, and the market for Ullmark was limited and challenging.

I'm starting to think that they should have kept Ullmark and traded Swayman, given Ullmark's insistence on remaining in the East limited the Bruin's trading partners and severely hurt their trade return.

Ullmark is older but is a similar quality goalie to Swayman. He only costs 5M and dealing Swayman wouldn't have required a cap dump like Korpisalo going back the other way. Ullmark also only costs 5M this year, while Swayman could cost a lot more.

Had they dealt Swayman instead they'd likely have around 5M or so in cap space (assuming Swayman costs 7-8M to lock up long-term and subtracting Korpisalo's 3M) and could have added a nice forward in free agency/trade, not to mention getting a lot more futures in return for Swayman than the mere late 1st they got for Ullmark.
 

Jeune Poulet

Registered User
Oct 31, 2019
1,899
4,514
And who has the cap space, the need for a starting goalie, and enough confidence that their 1st won't be a lottery pick to make that kind of offer?
Depends how teams see Swayman. With goalies, it isn't that easy to predict performances long term. I think he has franchise player potential that is worth an unprotected pick under the right circumstances.

The cap space is an issue for certain teams but if your offer somehow isn't matched and you get a player of that quality, you celebrate and make the deals to get under the cap.

Besides, teams like CBJ can probably afford him right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nbwingsfan

wintersej

Registered User
Nov 26, 2011
23,172
18,937
North Andover, MA
I'm starting to think that they should have kept Ullmark and traded Swayman, given Ullmark's insistence on remaining in the East limited the Bruin's trading partners and severely hurt their trade return.

Ullmark is older but is a similar quality goalie to Swayman. He only costs 5M and dealing Swayman wouldn't have required a cap dump like Korpisalo going back the other way. Ullmark also only costs 5M this year, while Swayman could cost a lot more.

Had they dealt Swayman instead they'd likely have around 5M or so in cap space (assuming Swayman costs 7-8M to lock up long-term and subtracting Korpisalo's 3M) and could have added a nice forward in free agency/trade, not to mention getting a lot more futures in return for Swayman than the mere late 1st they got for Ullmark.

I think before Swayman stole the net in the playoffs, this was on the table. But, it sure gets hard to sell it to yourself and especially the fan base after that. When a goalie shows he has “it” and there are very much questions around how well Ullmark handles the playoff pressure, it sure it hard outside of the white room to make that kind of move.
 

HockeyVirus

Woll stan.
Nov 15, 2020
19,443
29,712
Lol. No.

Swayman is not getting a $11,452,295 contract offer. That's what it takes to get four 1st rounders.

The offers he would be most likely be receiving are in the $6,871,374 - $9,161,834 bracket, which has one 1st-round picks, one 2nd-round pick and one 3rd-round pick compensation.

Ottawa has the chance to do the funniest thing and steal Boston's tandem or force them into a deal they don't want
 

BostonBob

4 Ever The Greatest
Jan 26, 2004
14,691
8,019
Vancouver, BC
Ottawa has the chance to do the funniest thing and steal Boston's tandem or force them into a deal they don't want
Oh man - that really would be so funny !!!!!!!

W2DqgLb.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guess

Hazy Little Thing

Registered User
Jan 19, 2022
659
577
Lol. No.

Swayman is not getting a $11,452,295 contract offer. That's what it takes to get four 1st rounders.

The offers he would be most likely be receiving are in the $6,871,374 - $9,161,834 bracket, which has one 1st-round picks, one 2nd-round pick and one 3rd-round pick compensation.
Would the Bruins match 10M?
 

Michoulicious

Registered User
Dec 9, 2014
7,508
8,246
I think, if he was willing to sign that contract, he would already be signed by the Bruins.
He's gonna cost MORE THAN THAT???

Ouch. Not touching that then. He's good, but he's no Vasi/Price/Lundqvist.
 

SPV

Zoinks!
Sponsor
Feb 4, 2003
11,345
6,220
New Hampshire
hfboards.com
Lol. No.

Swayman is not getting a $11,452,295 contract offer. That's what it takes to get four 1st rounders.

The offers he would be most likely be receiving are in the $6,871,374 - $9,161,834 bracket, which has one 1st-round picks, one 2nd-round pick and one 3rd-round pick compensation.
I think Boston would match anything up to that bracket without issue, the next bracket would be interesting. Not many teams have that cap space, a goalie need, and their own picks to make the offer sheet above 9.2. Swayman has never played a full starter’s role for a whole season. That’s a big risk to give up all those picks and be stuck with a monster contract if he can’t handle the load.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad