The Athletic has ranked their top 30 NHL teams... Leafs and Flames at the top

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
26,096
13,493
Regular season (just what I found googling):



Lowest log loss and one of the only ones to beat the books.

forgot to mention this part

Every model struggled and only one was able to beat the market, but it was still a bit disappointing to be closer to the middle than the top.
 

bossram

Registered User
Sep 25, 2013
16,689
17,136
Victoria
forgot to mention this part

Every model struggled and only one was able to beat the market, but it was still a bit disappointing to be closer to the middle than the top.
...And?

Every model struggled because of the unusually bifurcated distribution last season. Despite that, Dom's model was still the best and still beat the sportsbooks.

Nothing I said was incorrect. I gave evidence that Dom's model was the best-performing one last season. It was.
 

Northern Avs Fan

Registered User
May 27, 2019
21,970
29,648
The Flames are everyone’s favourite off-season flavour.

I’m sure they’ll have a great season, but they’re not getting through Edmonton, or Colorado in the playoffs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PuckG

ToDavid

Registered User
Dec 13, 2018
4,171
5,239
That’s not what his post mortem of last year says about the books.

I think there’s some confusion because he’s looking at two different metrics in his review. IIRC the average error of his pre-season points prediction didn’t beat the market. Only one model did and everyone, including the market, struggled compared to past years.

In individual game predictions throughout the season (log loss) he was on top and did beat the market.
 

Devonator

Registered User
Jan 5, 2003
4,842
2,682
I could see the leafs but noooooooooo wayyyyyyyyy the Flames....that is laughable......
 

Nihiliste

Registered User
Feb 8, 2010
11,576
4,732
The Avs ran through Edmonton like a hot knife through butter, and Edmonton walked thru Calgary in 5 games. Yet Calgary is ahead of Colorado?

Laughable

The teams are different though. Colorado lost a 2C that played like a 1C and Calgary gained that same player, and got another Hart candidate to replace their outgoing Hart candidate, and added a good Dman.

Colorado is trying out people like Newhook, Rodrigues, Compher none of whom will be able to fill Kadri’s shoes. Or they might try to move Rantanen to center but it’s not clear how that will go.

Plus Colorado lost a good top 6 winger in Burakovsky and potentially downgraded on an already weak position in net.

They might answer some of these questions via trade during the season but the cap didn’t allow them to ice as strong of a team this year
 

TK 421

Barbashev eats babies pass it on
Sep 12, 2007
6,621
6,465
I'm not saying Dom's model blows goats, but as a Blues fan my initial reaction is that Dom's model does appear to blow goats as it pertains to the Blues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HighNote

adsfan

#164303
May 31, 2008
13,082
4,095
Milwaukee
Little surprised how low the Blues consistently find themselves on all these "model-based" lists. I don't think they're necessarily a top contender, but they seem like a team that's firmly in the top 10 range.
Preds fan here.

The rankings are whacky! Toronto #1 overall? I should live to be that old to see it.

The Nashville fans see their division this season as:

1 Colorado

3 Nashville (or WC1)


I think St Louis looks like 2nd place and maybe Dallas for 4th.

Nobody is picking the Wild. Some of it may be Evason's coaching.


If The Pathetic swaps St Louis and the Wild, they would fit.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Azrael89

Bank Shot

Registered User
Jan 18, 2006
11,732
7,533
I mean, right there. His model isn't even primarily based on xGF%. Point production counts for more. So like, the criticism there isn't even accurate.

I definitely think his model has flaws - and Dom himself would say as much. But unless someone has a better systematic way to rank the teams, rather than just gut feeling, I would take his rankings as a solid baseline.

Again, his game prediction model has been better than anything else out there publicly (in the regular season).
The thing is, none of the models substantially out predict people just using their gut instincts.

If the models are 3% better than a bunch of random fans just throwing out predictions no one cares.
 

bossram

Registered User
Sep 25, 2013
16,689
17,136
Victoria
The thing is, none of the models substantially out predict people just using their gut instincts.

If the models are 3% better than a bunch of random fans just throwing out predictions no one cares.
This is categorically false. Dom’s model is clearly outperforming the general public - it’s outperforming the sportsbooks! And they have a very strong financial incentive to have accurate odds. In sports betting, a 3% edge on the house is massive and adds up to a lot of profit. If he’s 3% ahead, he’s doing very well.

If the average fan could predict games better than Dom’s model, every sportsbook would be broke.
 

Sidney the Kidney

One last time
Jun 29, 2009
56,757
49,164
I mean, right there. His model isn't even primarily based on xGF%. Point production counts for more. So like, the criticism there isn't even accurate.

I definitely think his model has flaws - and Dom himself would say as much. But unless someone has a better systematic way to rank the teams, rather than just gut feeling, I would take his rankings as a solid baseline.

Again, his game prediction model has been better than anything else out there publicly (in the regular season).

I didn't word that part right. I didn't mean his model was primarily based on xGF%. It was meant as part of an example of a general statement about if a model was heavily influenced by one particular stat like xGF% and someone has doubts about how accurate it is due to the limitations of that stat, some analytics folks will just hand wave the criticism away as "no stat is perfect. It's better than the eye test".
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad