Jackson Smith? Victor Eklund? Roger McQueen? McQueen or Eklund could be there at 8th.At the end of the season we'll have the 8th OA pick.
Then at the lottery we'll get jumped by two teams and end up with 10th overall.
So I'm not going to spend much time looking at top 6 type players.
On the flip side of that you are only looking at 3-4 wins and moving from 4th to 8th. On top of that Buffalo has 2-3 games in hand against the other bottom feeders.They did just drop six in a row. It's not like they're making some hero run.
I could easily see them draft in the 6 to 7 range, they have a lot of games in hand to teams ahead plus there is also the lottery which could move them back 1 spot.They did just drop six in a row. It's not like they're making some hero run.
I could easily see them draft in the 6 to 7 range, they have a lot of games in hand to teams ahead plus there is also the lottery which could move them back 1 spot.
they are not as bad as the real bottom dwellers and if the pressure falls off they usually string together some wins like the last 2.
It is the irresistible force vs the immovable object:Y'all are acting like the Sabres aren't going to win the lottery when the clear and inarguable #1 prospect is a LHD. Silliness. Matthew Schaefer will be a Sabre.
Drafting 6th could still get a player like Hagens. I could easily see someone dropping as it happens every year. I think there is solid 6-7 players before it drops off.I could easily see them draft in the 6 to 7 range, they have a lot of games in hand to teams ahead plus there is also the lottery which could move them back 1 spot.
they are not as bad as the real bottom dwellers and if the pressure falls off they usually string together some wins like the last 2.
In that unlikely event I would hope Adams is working with the team picking #2 to switch draft spots, pick Misa, and squeeze them for a useful asset.Y'all are acting like the Sabres aren't going to win the lottery when the clear and inarguable #1 prospect is a LHD. Silliness. Matthew Schaefer will be a Sabre.
Picking first does set up some difficulties, Trading down rarely seems to happen at this part of the draft, but something might be able to be worked out with San Jose. They have a much bigger need on defense than Chicago does.In that unlikely event I would hope Adams is working with the team picking #2 to switch draft spots, pick Misa, and squeeze them for a useful asset.
Chicago and San Jose both have their 1C and possibly their goalies of the future (Knight and Askarov). They'll be drooling to move up a spot to land a projected #1D.
And we'd be set at center for the foreseeable future - Tage, Norris, Misa, McLeod, Kulich, Krebs, Kozak, Helenius, Wahlberg. Mix and match as you please. Some would obviously play wing or be moved.
No. 1: Matthew Schaefer, D, 6-foot-2, 183 pounds, Erie Otters (OHL)
Continues to rehab and will be re-evaluated in early April. He probably doesn’t have to play another game this season to maintain this spot, but there will be interest in seeing him if Erie is able to extend its playoff fortunes.
No. 2: Michael Misa, C, 6-foot-1, 184 pounds, Saginaw Spirit (OHL)
Has definitely lived up to the Exceptional Player Status reputation. As of writing, he’s tied for the CHL lead with 126 points, and second in the CHL with 59 goals. He's having a season for the ages with a little time left to hit the 60-goal milestone.
No. 3: Caleb Desnoyers, C, 6-foot-2, 178 pounds, Moncton Wildcats (QMJHL)
Continues to impress with his professional approach to the game. He’s the type of player a coach can trust in any situation.
No. 4: James Hagens, C, 5-foot-11, 177 pounds, Boston College (NCAA)
Playing NCAA hockey this season has proven that he can still excel against bigger, stronger competition. He needed that to show scouts he belongs amongst the top of this draft class.
No. 5: Anton Frondell, C, 6-foot-1, 198 pounds, Djurgardens (Allsvenskan)
An amazing progression this season based on dealing with injuries dating back to the summer. You could argue he’s had the best second half of any player on this list.
No. 6: Porter Martone, RW, 6-foot-3, 208 pounds, Brampton Steelheads (OHL)
In his draft minus-one season, Martone made his mark as a shooter and a scorer. While he continues to do that, his playmaking has improved and now presents a more balanced dual-threat game with a nice dose of toughness.
No. 7: Roger McQueen, C, 6-foot-5, 197 pounds, Brandon Wheat Kings (WHL)
Doing his best to make up for lost time with eight points in his six games back from injury. The NHL Combine will ultimately determine his fate.
No. 8: Victor Eklund, LW, 5-foot-11, 161 pounds, Djurgardens (Allsvenskan)
Perpetual motion is the best way to describe his play. If he’s not lurking around the offensive zone, he’s finding a way to track pucks.
No. 9: Radim Mrtka, D, 6-foot-6, 207 pounds, Seattle Thunderbirds (WHL)
Has cooled off from his point per game start after arriving in North America. A first-round match-up with league leading Everett will be a great test and measuring stick for scouts.
No. 10: Jake O’Brien, C, 6-foot-2, 172 pounds, Brantford Bulldogs (OHL)
Once he adds weight and strength, he will be able to hold on to pucks longer, fight off defenders and create even more havoc for opponents than he does now.
Desnoyers has jumped up in the rankings. I think McQueen could be a steal in the draft because of the injury. Hard to look past 6'5 and puts up points.![]()
Sportsnet's 2025 NHL Draft Rankings: March Edition
With regular seasons winding down and important playoff viewings around the corner for scouts, Sam Cosentino gives his latest ranking of the top 32 prospects for the 2025 NHL Draft.www.sportsnet.ca
The never ending cycle of failure has nothing to do with the draft and everything to do with who is running the organizations that can never find a way to win.The draft lottery might be the only idea in NHL history dumber than the Delay of Game penalty for shooting a puck over the glass or the instigator rule. One of the most destructive things the league has ever done that has lead to multiple teams being stuck in a neverending cycle of failure.
Wasn't just talking about us.The never ending cycle of failure has nothing to do with the draft and everything to do with who is running the organizations that can never find a way to win.
I assumed you were talking about Detroit too, since they are really the only other teams who got screwed by the lottery. Hasn’t really impacted anyone else.Wasn't just talking about us.
I assumed you were talking about Detroit too, since they are really the only other teams who got screwed by the lottery. Hasn’t really impacted anyone else.
I've never been a fan of the lottery. Teams are going to work to get what they want anyway. I think the NFL's system of just letting teams play and draft based on record is the best way to go.Arizona lost out big time in 2015. If they have Eichel instead of Strome, they might have had a different group of owners and still exist. But yes, Buffalo and DRW are the other two big losers in the lottery era.
Disagree. That one draft did not sink their franchise. It was one player in one draft…any good GM could’ve taken it on the chin on that one pick and still succeed.Arizona lost out big time in 2015. If they have Eichel instead of Strome, they might have had a different group of owners and still exist. But yes, Buffalo and DRW are the other two big losers in the lottery era.