K8fool
Registered User
Is my dream true. Cozens healthy scratch?
Is my dream true. Cozens healthy scratch?
Screw this. No offense I'm the insane one. Even w guys hurtMynhldraft.com
Has us picking 7th
2025 NHL Mock Draft | 2025 NHL Draft | NHL Draft
2025 NHL Mock Draft and NHL Draft History. 2025 NHL Draft prospect videos, stats, and written profiles updated throughout the year.www.mynhldraft.com
Well, because there is a difference in the players and in their production, and a serious one at that.You’re getting way too hung up on top 6 and bottom 6. Plenty of non top line players are in the “top 6” because of fit and chemistry.
When Granato focused Cozens on defense and match ups against top centers like McDavid and Matthews two years ago, he excelled.
And? I also talked about this a few years ago.you just mentioned adding a bunch of guys that the poster you're quoting has been banging his hand on the table to add for years....
2Inside you are two wolves.
1 - Lots of trades, executed by Adams
2 - No trades, Adams fired and replaced
Which scenario do you prefer? I feel like we're all sick of the majority of this roster, but do you trust the man in charge to do the right thing?
When would the trade moratorium be lifted for the new GM? As long as it doesn’t apply to the coming off-season, I choose option 2.Inside you are two wolves.
1 - Lots of trades, executed by Adams
2 - No trades, Adams fired and replaced
Which scenario do you prefer? I feel like we're all sick of the majority of this roster, but do you trust the man in charge to do the right thing?
When would the trade moratorium be lifted for the new GM? As long as it doesn’t apply to the coming off-season, I choose option 2.
I think Zucker will go to a contender for a 2nd. Greenway/Byrum hopefully can be moved in a hockey trade if they are not re-signing.I don't care who the GM is, they need to be sellers at the deadline.
I would re-sign Zucker right now, especially since he has expressed a desire to do so. Baker and Fairburn are right, you should re-sign him. Fairburn has spoken to Zucker and was impressed with him as a person and what he brings to this team. He is a positive and good vet and he likes it in Buffalo, despite the situation the team is in. Even draft fan Baker said he probably wouldn't trade Zucker for a late first to a contender, since you would still have to replace Zucker on this team and that would be difficult. Of course, if they can't re-sign him before the TDL, trade him.I think Zucker will go to a contender for a 2nd. Greenway/Byrum hopefully can be moved in a hockey trade if they are not re-signing.
I don't think he will re-sign with a bottom 5 team (Sabres) even if he likes the area. It's not personal it's business-The Godfather.I would re-sign Zucker right now, especially since he has expressed a desire to do so. Baker and Fairburn are right, you should re-sign him. Fairburn has spoken to Zucker and was impressed with him as a person and what he brings to this team. He is a positive and good vet and he likes it in Buffalo, despite the situation the team is in. Even draft fan Baker said he probably wouldn't trade Zucker for a late first to a contender, since you would still have to replace Zucker on this team and that would be difficult. Of course, if they can't re-sign him before the TDL, trade him.
At least he said it publicly and he said it with enthusiasm. You have plenty of time to do it. It's just that Zucker probably got tired of moving all the time, and Zucker also said that he likes this Lindy system and he fits in much better than in Arizona. About his family, I'm not sure, I think he's the only one here and he's divorced and has two kids.I don't think he will re-sign with a bottom 5 team (Sabres) even if he and the family likes the area. It's not personal it's business-The Godfather.
If you're talking about me, I don't remember pounding the table for Crouse, Coleman, etc. You're going to have to show me where I did more than just an one-off comment.you just mentioned adding a bunch of guys that the poster you're quoting has been banging his hand on the table to add for years....
None of it's guarenteed, even any of the stuff you recommend. You're big on Crouse. We could trade for him tomorrow and he could come to Buffalo and suck.Well, because there is a difference in the players and in their production, and a serious one at that.
These were one-offs, can he play like this every game? Who will make him such a player? It's all a dubious theory that he will succeed.
And? I also talked about this a few years ago.
For me, if he will re-sign, then do it and don't trade him and hope to get him back in the summer.I don't think he will re-sign with a bottom 5 team (Sabres) even if he likes the area. It's not personal it's business-The Godfather.
Crouse is good on defense and PK even with this season, plus he is physical, he had good stats in the last two seasons. Probably in the worst case we will get a normal third liner, who is as useful as Greenway.If you're talking about me, I don't remember pounding the table for Crouse, Coleman, etc. You're going to have to show me where I did more than just an one-off comment.
I, for sure, pound on certain additions. Tuch, Fabbro, Brady Tkachuk, etc. But not those guys.
None of it's guarenteed, even any of the stuff you recommend. You're big on Crouse. We could trade for him tomorrow and he could come to Buffalo and suck.
Here's what we know: Cozens is struggling as a top 6 center playing a two-way game with offensive minded wingers. In the short sample size where he was used as a shutdown center against McDavid and Matthews, he excelled. Everything beyond that is a guess.
My whole point is to change the system to a defense-first system. Simplify Cozens' game and focus him on a Cirelli-style shutdown role. See what happens. It can't be any worse than what's happening right now.
I get it. But the chances of trading for Pettersson, or any real top 6 center, are slim. Your best bets for top 6 6 additions are named Misa and Hagens. That's the nature of top line centers.Crouse is good on defense and PK even with this season, plus he is physical, he had good stats in the last two seasons. Probably in the worst case we will get a normal third liner, who is as useful as Greenway.
I would still try to get a top 6 C, this is important. Now of course you can try Cozens in such a role, but he continues to look bad mostly, occasionally showing good games. I'm just not a fan of Cozens and his game.
Well, I'm not against it, but again it's all risky, that we'll miss the playoffs again and go bankrupt. I'd like more confidence in the future. I like Hagens, Misa too, but a little less.I get it. But the chances of trading for Pettersson, or any real top 6 center, are slim. Your best bets for top 6 6 additions are named Misa and Hagens. That's the nature of top line centers.
My idea is to salvage what the Sabres have into something workable, with some supporting evidence that it could work.
Cozens played the shutdown center role for Granato two years ago for 8-10 games, including against McDavid and Matthews. And he was good at it.Well, I'm not against it, but again it's all risky, that we'll miss the playoffs again and go bankrupt. I'd like more confidence in the future. I like Hagens, Misa too, but a little less.
And what if it can't work with this coaching staff or these players? Or maybe all together. To develop Cozens in such a role, you need to be confident in another part of your team. And why Cozens, and not Kulich, for example? Ruff continues to praise Kulich for his play in the center.
So what happened? Maybe he's not good enough anymore or maybe the coaches don't see him as a player on a regular basis.Cozens played the shutdown center role for Granato two years ago for 8-10 games, including against McDavid and Matthews. And he was good at it.
Inside you are two wolves.
1 - Lots of trades, executed by Adams
2 - No trades, Adams fired and replaced
Which scenario do you prefer? I feel like we're all sick of the majority of this roster, but do you trust the man in charge to do the right thing?
I don't know why Granato stopped it.So what happened? Maybe he's not good enough anymore or maybe the coaches don't see him as a player on a regular basis.
I don't know either, and why Ruff doesn't try it then. I mean, maybe they Cozens will get traded before they try it.I don't know why Granato stopped it.
No. Nearly all of the players that have gone on to find success elsewhere had at least decent stats here.Rather, this collection of players, under this coach, under this moron GM and owner have produced garbage results, resulting is bad numbers and charts.
Pluck almost any guy off this roster and put him on a good team and he will thrive -- sans Jeff Skinner, who will always suck anywhere, anytime. I still got about a dozen examples that prove this.
The garbage numbers are an effect of bad teams, but good teams are not the sum total of players with good charts.
Maybe??.... Only 2 first rounders in the top 15 in scoring (not vastly dissimilar from most teams). Best guy who was expected on the roster is in the NHL. Good decisions on vets who can help the roster. Good depth. Special teams are pretty average. Top 3 in GF/Game and 10th in GA. Fun group and good team!Rochester's success is built on our draft picks being nhl-tweeners though...
Because he wasn't good at it! He is great at shutting down rushes, he is a strong forechecker, he is good at taking the body, all the things that are easy to see... He is not good at reading the play and he gets up ice too early leaving the D outnumbered down low (wrong side of the check/puck as they say). McDavid had one bad game against the Sabres over the last three seasons and Tage was the matchup.I don't know why Granato stopped it.