Do we have to get a "defensive defenseman" if we want another? What are some examples of teams that were too heavy with offensive guys on the back-end?
It seems like the consensus is to get a big/stay at home guy since we have Dahlin, Byram and Power, but would it be the worst thing in the world to have another puck mover?
That aside, what about oleksiak?
Well, I gave the example of Vegas recently. They have Pietro, Hanifin and Theodore in the top 4. None of them are defensive defensemen, and the Hanifin - Pietro pair suffers in defense, our first pair Byram - Dahlin in this regard is much better. But they also have McNabb in the top 4, sometimes Whitecloud (Hague got injured and Whitecloud entered the top 4). We have Jokiharju and Bryson, who are not like McNabb and Whitecloud in terms of physical play and level of play.
I think we need a right-hander. Ruff said that he does not like it when guys play on the wrong side, also there is not a single team in the NHL where the top 4 are all left-handed. Oleksiak is a left-hander.
I'm not just stuck on "big defensive guy who's reliable and hits." Then the options for that criteria are much smaller. I think there are some interesting options, but it would probably have to be a player who's decent at defense, right-handed, that's all that matters to me personally, but I don't know what criteria are important for Ruff. Maybe a guy like McNabb, or maybe someone else.