Prospect Info: The 2023 NHL Entry Draft Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

ps241

The Ballad of Ville Bobby
Sponsor
Mar 10, 2010
35,558
33,909
McKenzie has an updated list with a top-12 and 5 "honourable mentions":

1. Bedard
2. Fantilli
3. Smith
4. Carlsson
5. Michkov
6. Dvorsky
7. Leonard
8. Benson
9. Perreault
10. Reinbacher
11. Barlow
12. Wood

HM:
Yager
Moore
Danielson
Sandin-Pellikka
Honzek

Given how draft boards tend to vary, it seems likely that a few from this group would likely be available at the Jets' pick at #19. I would guess that the more likely "fallers" (to #19) from this group would be:

Perreault
Yager
Danielson
Honzek
Sandin-Pellika
Wood
Barlow


Thoughts?

I think out of your possible fallers I would probably choose Yager. People I chatted with that watched him this year say good things.
 
Last edited:

Whileee

Registered User
May 29, 2010
46,537
34,955
Florida is one won away from moving the Jets up to pick #18.

That would also mean that the Habs' second 1st-round pick would lose a lot of value, dropping to #29 (or lower). That might change trade options for PLD, this off-season. I suppose the Habs could bundle the #29 and #37 picks in a Dubois trade. That wouldn't be as exciting for Jets fans, but the overall pick value would be a bit higher than the #18 by itself.

So, if available, would you prefer the Jets to have pick #18 or picks #29 and #37 as part of a Dubois trade?
 

surixon

Registered User
Jul 12, 2003
50,891
75,036
Winnipeg
Florida is one won away from moving the Jets up to pick #18.

That would also mean that the Habs' second 1st-round pick would lose a lot of value, dropping to #29 (or lower). That might change trade options for PLD, this off-season. I suppose the Habs could bundle the #29 and #37 picks in a Dubois trade. That wouldn't be as exciting for Jets fans, but the overall pick value would be a bit higher than the #18 by itself.

So, if available, would you prefer the Jets to have pick #18 or picks #29 and #37 as part of a Dubois trade?

If that comes to pass I'd want Montreals 2024 first round pick instead.

If ours goes to 18 it really won't change who we get vs. at 19. I think we are still looking at one of the two way C's or one of the top 2 RD.
 
Last edited:

Huffer

Registered User
Jul 16, 2010
16,935
7,050
Florida is one won away from moving the Jets up to pick #18.

That would also mean that the Habs' second 1st-round pick would lose a lot of value, dropping to #29 (or lower). That might change trade options for PLD, this off-season. I suppose the Habs could bundle the #29 and #37 picks in a Dubois trade. That wouldn't be as exciting for Jets fans, but the overall pick value would be a bit higher than the #18 by itself.

So, if available, would you prefer the Jets to have pick #18 or picks #29 and #37 as part of a Dubois trade?
If we knew 100% that PLD to the Habs would be the best offer and that pick would be a main part it might be better to have both 17 and 19.

But even if the Habs will be the most interested, if the pick moves from 18 to 29, that can be offset in any number of ways by adding a better prospect than we might have got if the pick was 18, switching the pick to 2024, etc.
 

DRW204

Registered User
Dec 26, 2010
23,072
28,561
If we knew 100% that PLD to the Habs would be the best offer and that pick would be a main part it might be better to have both 17 and 19.

But even if the Habs will be the most interested, if the pick moves from 18 to 29, that can be offset in any number of ways by adding a better prospect than we might have got if the pick was 18, switching the pick to 2024, etc.
i don't think they'll be offering their '24 1st. that team still is still going to be bottom-10 imo. if it's 29th vs 17th, what's the difference in prospect you're expecting?

similar off-season deals for pending RFAs

FIala for 19th overall + Faber.
Reinhart for 1st+Levi (1st ended up 28th)
 

Atoyot

Registered User
Jul 19, 2013
13,859
25,274
I stumbled upon the following video on my YT feed. This kid just got USHL player of the year and will be eligible in 2024. Probably a player people know already about but what I actually want to point to

THE GUY IS CALLED MACKLIN CELEBRINI

ARE YOU KIDDING ME? WE NEED HIM!

Imagine our new generation on the ice in 2026/2027

Cole Perfetti, Rutger McGroarty, Chaz Lucius, Macklin Celebrini, Domenic DiVincentiis

This would be the most epic NHL roster name wise in the history of the NHL





*edit

Shoot we also need Frantelli. What are the odds of him falling down to our pick? :sarcasm:

Going to have to tank if we want Celebrini, he's likely to go top 3.
 

Huffer

Registered User
Jul 16, 2010
16,935
7,050
i don't think they'll be offering their '24 1st. that team still is still going to be bottom-10 imo. if it's 29th vs 19th, what's the difference in prospect you're expecting?

similar off-season deals for pending RFAs

FIala for 19th overall + Faber.
Reinhart for 1st+Levi (1st ended up 28th)
They could do a protected 2024 1st as I agree they wouldn't want to trade it unprotected.

Hard to say the difference in prospect because we don't know how each team values them. I'm just saying that if it's 19 + X, or 29 + Y, that Y could be a better prospect that wouldn't have been offered with 19. Or maybe you get 2 prospects with 29 instead of 1.
 

drumzan

#NHLJets
Jul 9, 2011
3,475
1,545
Florida is one won away from moving the Jets up to pick #18.

That would also mean that the Habs' second 1st-round pick would lose a lot of value, dropping to #29 (or lower). That might change trade options for PLD, this off-season. I suppose the Habs could bundle the #29 and #37 picks in a Dubois trade. That wouldn't be as exciting for Jets fans, but the overall pick value would be a bit higher than the #18 by itself.

So, if available, would you prefer the Jets to have pick #18 or picks #29 and #37 as part of a Dubois trade?
I mentioned this exact scenario in another post. Definitely 29 and 37 because the Jets need more picks and don’t have a 2nd rounder in next two drafts.
 

cbcwpg

Registered User
May 18, 2010
20,578
21,855
Between the Pipes
I ran the lottery sim 10 times just now, and in only 1 time did the picks actually stay in the pre-lottery order, So 9 out of 10 times someone was moving up and kicking the Ducks out of the #1 spot. I actually had Vancouver winning on one sim. We will see where Bettman wants the balls to fall...
 

Whileee

Registered User
May 29, 2010
46,537
34,955
I mentioned this exact scenario in another post. Definitely 29 and 37 because the Jets need more picks and don’t have a 2nd rounder in next two drafts.
Sorry, I missed that post. I think we agree on this.
 

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
58,958
31,477
I think Scheifele has wanted out of Winnipeg for a long while now and Chevy has done nothing with his requests and he has his nose out of joint which carries a lot of influence with other players that aren’t happy with their situation. I think once Scheifele gets moved we will likely see a couple career years out of him and he will play in a way that that fan base will be very happy with what they will consider a steal from Winnipeg.

Do you have anything to base this on?
 
  • Like
Reactions: snowkiddin

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
58,958
31,477
McKenzie has an updated list with a top-12 and 5 "honourable mentions":

1. Bedard
2. Fantilli
3. Smith
4. Carlsson
5. Michkov
6. Dvorsky
7. Leonard
8. Benson
9. Perreault
10. Reinbacher
11. Barlow
12. Wood

HM:
Yager
Moore
Danielson
Sandin-Pellikka
Honzek

Given how draft boards tend to vary, it seems likely that a few from this group would likely be available at the Jets' pick at #19. I would guess that the more likely "fallers" (to #19) from this group would be:

Perreault
Yager
Danielson
Honzek
Sandin-Pellika
Wood
Barlow


Thoughts?

McKenzie is usually pretty close to what actually happens. I wouldn't count on very many fallers. But we only need 1. :naughty:
 

belzebob1

Registered User
Jun 22, 2022
16
10
i do not know if this has been posted already, but this is what i would do at the draft.

they have had time to talk with dubois.

if he has not signed an extension, then i would put him up for the highest bidder at the draft

much better than letting him pull a "trouba", and tying the teams hands in a trade or walking as a ufa
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlaskaJet

Thechozen1

Registered User
Sep 8, 2021
2,739
3,947
If we knew 100% that PLD to the Habs would be the best offer and that pick would be a main part it might be better to have both 17 and 19.

But even if the Habs will be the most interested, if the pick moves from 18 to 29, that can be offset in any number of ways by adding a better prospect than we might have got if the pick was 18, switching the pick to 2024, etc.
I wonder if you can get the 1st and your choice of two of Beck, Roy, Kidney.

Getting the extra prospect who is closer to ready would help speed up the rebuild/retool.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huffer

hockeyarena

Registered User
Aug 11, 2011
3,188
5,621
Winnipeg
www.hockeyarena.net
This is what I would do in the draft ... draft big strong tough Canadians over and over and over.
Anyone who is watching the playoffs know this.
i'd add western in front of canadians as well. i'd also be curious if players from rich families are less likely to stay in winnipeg than players from the middle class, not that they'd ever publish that data.

---

does it drive anyone else nuts when the media publishes articles like "Draft Lottery Live Tonight on TSN" and then neglects to post what time the program is occurring? Like when should I tune into your network? I'm seeing this more and more where I have to go on a quest separate from the article to find very basic info.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Luc Labelle
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad