RobertKron
Registered User
- Sep 1, 2007
- 15,381
- 10,693
Oh, right, I always forget it's Dec 31, not the start of the season.Quick glance shows they all did.
Oh, right, I always forget it's Dec 31, not the start of the season.Quick glance shows they all did.
What type of player do you expect him to be? All those players are completely different at the NHL level.I really hope Bloom can be like a Ryan Callahan , Kevin Leblanc or Mike Hoffman type or should I even say jonathan marchessault.
Let’s hope his overage season can turn him into a future Vancouver productive player especially after the game of his life today !!!!
It's somewhat interesting that Mynio is the only one of those drafted by the Canucks.Here's Drance and Dayal's first half of their top-10 Canucks prospects.
10) Nikita Tolopilo
9) Max Sasson
8) Cole McWard
7) Arshdeep Bains
6) Sawyer Mynio
When the Canucks have traded away 2020 1st and 2nd, 2021 1st, 3rd, 2022 and 2023 2nd rounder. This year with no 1st and 2nd round pick either. A poor NCAA, CHL draft classes where no one was signed.It's somewhat interesting that Mynio is the only one of those drafted by the Canucks.
Tolopilo has a 21 year old brother playing in Belarus: 6'3", 196 lbs, RD.
Agreed.....once and awhile an Alex Burrows comes along, who simply refuses to take 'no' for an answer. No matter how long the odds, they approach their hockey hockey career with an indefatigable work ethic and a determination to succeed.One of these days a long shot prospect will pan out and we will celebrate with a bushel of emojis.
I believe that the rest of their list is thus:Here's Drance and Dayal's first half of their top-10 Canucks prospects.
10) Nikita Tolopilo
9) Max Sasson
8) Cole McWard
7) Arshdeep Bains
6) Sawyer Mynio
Vancouver needs some HUGE summers from their prospects. 16 games 0 points from rookies last season for the Canucks. They would be the only team that didn't have a rookie score a point from last season if not for Florida. They had no points but in 8 games.Our prospect pool has a long way to go (!!!) but there are some legit guys on the list now.
Tolopilo (#10), Sasson (#9), McWard (#8), Bains (#7) are guys that could all see NHL action as soon as this season.
None of them are top of the lineup types but it’s nice to at least have enough depth in our prospect pool where you can expect some of the deeper guys to step in and help when called upon.
We need a lot more in terms of top of the lineup type of prospects but at least it’s better than where we’ve been.
Vancouver needs some HUGE summers from their prospects. 16 games 0 points from rookies last season for the Canucks. They would be the only team that didn't have a rookie score a point from last season if not for Florida. They had no points but in 8 games.
In the past 2 seasons Canucks rookies have 25 points in 132 games. (16 from Aman previous season).
I've always defended Canucks prospect pool being a little better than what a lot have ranked but after this year, they are deserving the ranking of being a bottom half prospect pool.
Do you think 3 potential prospects makes the Canucks system good? There are teams with 5 or 6 of those types of players in their pool.I'm not sure how 23-24 results from players who are no longer prospects means we deserve to be ranked as a bad prospect pool?
We had the worst prospect pool in the league when Jim Benning was fired midway through the 21-22 season. That has translated to few players hitting the NHL in 22-23 and 23-24. It doesn't mean that Willander/Lekkerimaki/Silovs aren't excellent prospects looking ahead to 24-25 and 25-26.
So many posters were all about how Benning filled the prospect pool, how Gillis emptied it by winning all those games.Our prospect pool has a long way to go (!!!) but there are some legit guys on the list now.
Tolopilo (#10), Sasson (#9), McWard (#8), Bains (#7) are guys that could all see NHL action as soon as this season.
None of them are top of the lineup types but it’s nice to at least have enough depth in our prospect pool where you can expect some of the deeper guys to step in and help when called upon.
We need a lot more in terms of top of the lineup type of prospects but at least it’s better than where we’ve been.
name the teams with 5 willander type prospectsDo you think 3 potential prospects makes the Canucks system good? There are teams with 5 or 6 of those types of players in their pool.
Half the league will get that amount of talent in this draft alone.
Basically every team that picked in the top 15-20 of the Willander draft, and top tenish last year. And then adjust for the risers or fallers (at best, Willander has traded water on draft position ).name the teams with 5 willander type prospects
Lame. The what-ifs go the other way too. What if he didn't trade Forsling, what if he kept Chatfield instead of getting rid of him like most of HF Canucks wanted, what if Juolevi didn't suffer movement-disabling injuries, what if Virtanen matured into an actual adult... and so on.So many posters were all about how Benning filled the prospect pool, how Gillis emptied it by winning all those games.
There have to be many, many posters with egg on their faces and embarrassed that they got led by the nose into thinking Benning did such a great job.
What IF Brackett didn't win the argument to draft Pettersson instead of Glass or if Hughes was drafted by Detroit instead of falling into his lap.
so, teams that have 2 of them... okBasically every team that picked in the top 15-20 of the Willander draft, and top tenish last year. And then adjust for the risers or fallers (at best, Willander has traded water on draft position ).
I don’t want to rehash everything, but Juolevi’s development went off the rails before his injuries, and not after. So it’s more likely he was just a bad pick.Lame. The what-ifs go the other way too. What if he didn't trade Forsling, what if he kept Chatfield instead of getting rid of him like most of HF Canucks wanted, what if Juolevi didn't suffer movement-disabling injuries, what if Virtanen matured into an actual adult... and so on.
If we look at reality, he built today's core, but he sucked at virtually everything else. I'm glad I wasn't one of the ones pretending to be Benning's champion, but this what-if stuff is lame.
so, teams that have 2 of them... ok
ya, but what if?I don’t want to rehash everything, but Juolevi’s development went off the rails before his injuries, and not after. So it’s more likely he was just a bad pick.
as someone who brushed them off, there's no doubt juolevi sent out danger signals early and often. it is highly doubtful in hindsight that there was ever a player there.I don’t want to rehash everything, but Juolevi’s development went off the rails before his injuries, and not after. So it’s more likely he was just a bad pick.
Those types meaning Lekkerimaki, Willander, Silovs.name the teams with 5 willander type prospects