ConnorMcMullet
#12 Colby Cave
- Jun 10, 2017
- 10,373
- 18,269
What's the verdict on Newhook? Seems like a quick super skilled guy, prototypical new-era NHL forward. Is the quality of competition the only reason he's not being ranked higher?
Really like Lavoie too. I have him around 13 but I think he'd be an incredible fit on this team.
For us he would. Speaks english, seems to be a smart player. Can get into open space well and knows how to play to his strengths (size/shot).Will he translate better than Puljujarvi? I know he's known for his shot.
I agree with the above response. In my opinion the main reason for Pulju not translating is his lack of finishing ability. His release is slow and he can't get the puck up in tight. Lavoie is good at that, so I think he'll do better.Will he translate better than Puljujarvi? I know he's known for his shot.
For us he would. Speaks english, seems to be a smart player. Can get into open space well and knows how to play to his strengths (size/shot).
Although it isn't really a concern for us, I think he ends up as a rw at the NHL level. A sniper/power forward type rw.
I agree with the above response. In my opinion the main reason for Pulju not translating is his lack of finishing ability. His release is slow and he can't get the puck up in tight. Lavoie is good at that, so I think he'll do better.
And yes, I think he'll be a RW at the NHL level.
I'm a big fan of Pelletier too, but I think Lavoie is a better fit. Pelletier plays a similar game to Yamamoto - small but gritty, doesn't just rely on skill - but Lavoie is something this organization lacks. We don't have any powerforwards in the pipeline and Lavoie has a great one-timer and gives us a right-shot we need.I like the other Quebec prospect Jakob Pelletier a little more. Although a lot smaller in size 38 goals in 62 games is half decent.
I'm a big fan of Pelletier too, but I think Lavoie is a better fit. Pelletier plays a similar game to Yamamoto - small but gritty, doesn't just rely on skill - but Lavoie is something this organization lacks. We don't have any powerforwards in the pipeline and Lavoie has a great one-timer and gives us a right-shot we need.
We also don't know if Nuge will sign an extension with us (nor if we'd want to pay the price) when his contract expires.
Nuge has two years left on his deal. Hypothetically, there is a good chance Lavoie can step in on his draft +3 season (1 year back in juniors, 1 year in the AHL).
The Mooseheads produce good NHL players, I'd be pretty happy with drafting Lavoie and what it means for our center depth in the future.
Having a RHC in the top 6 also gives the coach a lot more flexibility on how he uses his lines.
He does it occasionally but is better on the wing. His play style is much better suited to the wing, he plays mostly on the rw, and he'll be a winger at the NHL level.Can Lavoie play center?
I'm pretty sure he's one of those guys who is listed as a center, but has basically only ever played wing in junior.
More Heinola:
This kid is so good.
We could build around this:I want Edmonton to take Lavoie as well. He would fit right into the team like a glove. Swagger of Draisaitl along with his shot and more speed at a younger age. Also, he is right handed. Would look good with McDavid, Leon, Nuge, Benson. Heck, any of our playmakers
If someone manages to nab Turcotte at 8 they're gonna be looking back and laughing their ass off 2-3 years in the future.Future Considerations put out a new list.
https://futureconsiderations.ca/top-rankings-2019/
Looks pretty good.
The OHL rankings are way off to me, but somewhat general consensus.
Future Considerations put out a new list.
https://futureconsiderations.ca/top-rankings-2019/
Looks pretty good.
The OHL rankings are way off to me, but somewhat general consensus.
Future Considerations put out a new list.
https://futureconsiderations.ca/top-rankings-2019/
Looks pretty good.
The OHL rankings are way off to me, but somewhat general consensus.
Both of those guys should go higher than that. Dorofeyev has much better numbers than Podkolzin this year.Following the Future Considerations draft list, if we get the ~8th pick, I would consider trading down for two 1sts.
They had Lavoie at 19 and Dorofeyev at 30. If we could nab both of them, I would go dance in the streets.
Just to inject on this - Erik Gustafsson also met expectations. He was a 2012 4th round pick by Oilers and as a defenseman has 49 points in 66 games. Of course, Oilers did not sign him and he became a UFA, but he was a good pick.I am wary right now given the Oilers' track record with Euro prospects in the last decade. I think Klefbom is the only Euro draft pick that really met expectations.
Another one of Chia's blunder. Not signing Tkachev was anotherJust to inject on this - Erik Gustafsson also met expectations. He was a 2012 4th round pick by Oilers and as a defenseman has 49 points in 66 games. Of course, Oilers did not sign him and he became a UFA, but he was a good pick.
Another one of Chia's blunder. Not signing Tkachev was another