Oh, oh.....now do Conn Smythes!I wonder if there was a goalie in MTL for Lemaire's entire tenure there. Imagine if that goalie never won another vezina after Lemaire left the organization.
Surely that goalie would also gets his accomplishments discredited like broduer does
Brodeur vezinas without lemaire: 4
Roy vezinas without lemaire: 0
Broduer had 7 shutouts in a playoff run and didn't get it. Roy had that many in a REGULAR season just 3 times in 2 decades.Oh, oh.....now do Conn Smythes!
Devils and their trapping, all out defense got 7 shutouts and Brodeur didn't get the conn smythe? Shows how much the voters thought it was on him as opposed to the team and structure around him.Broduer had 7 shutouts in a playoff run and didn't get it. Roy had that many in a REGULAR season just 3 times in 2 decades.
If only brodeur bitched his way to a superteam the second the team wasn't stacked around him again like roy did.
Roy took over for an already elite team to start his career, then left for another already elite team, then when he retired that team remained elite.
He's on the top 10 playoff performers listDon't see Matthews
It shows that Gigeure had an also utterly ridiculous run and that media hated Broduer because the way the devils put belt to ass was "boring"Devils and their trapping, all out defense got 7 shutouts and Brodeur didn't get the conn smythe? Shows how much the voters thought it was on him as opposed to the team and structure around him.
You don’t have to put the quotes around boring. It was boring.It shows that Gigeure had an also utterly ridiculous run and that media hated Broduer because the way the devils put belt to ass was "boring"
Roy did not win a single Vezina without Lemaire in the organization.
For my money, the most prestigious individual player award is the conn smythe. Meant you were more or less the best player when it mattered most and your team had success. Whether he was a rookie (86), on a lunch pail team (93) or a team of HoFers (01), Roy was the most valuable player.It shows that Gigeure had an also utterly ridiculous run and that media hated Broduer because the way the devils put belt to ass was "boring"
Roy did not win a single Vezina without Lemaire in the organization.
Do people even think that’s crosbys best season? This Ovechkin season blows crosbys out of the water
We're comparing Crosby and OV, and you bring in a totally irrelevant to our discussion player from one of the highest scoring eras ever and a season that happened over 4 decades ago. I'm guessing Harvard Law is not on your resume'.
Do people even think that’s crosbys best season? This Ovechkin season blows crosbys out of the water
Fair enough, he has a slight edge voting wise; they're still equals during that time period factoring in playoff success and statistics. I don't think comparing their Vezinas tells the whole tale though.Brodeur had 1 win, 3 top 2, and 8 top 5 in the 10 years they overlapped.
Roy had 0 wins, 1 top 2, and 6 top 5 finishes in the 10 years they overlapped.
Broduer finished ahead of him basically every year except his rookie year (where he was splitting time still).
Before they overlapped, Roy had 3 vezinas and 1 other top 5 finish.
After they overlapped, Broduer had 3 vezinas and 2 other top 5 finishes (unfortunately getting robbed of a year of his peak by the lockout).
Only stat readers.Do people even think that’s crosbys best season? This Ovechkin season blows crosbys out of the water
Mine is the same although I simply didn't include goalies so instead of Hasek I have Jagr but certainly understand that Hasek/Roy are most probably top 10 all time players but goalies are so hard to slot in.Gretzky
Lemieux
Orr
Howe
Crosby
Hull
Hasek
McDavid
Beliveau
Bourque
McDavid will move up to #5 by the time he retires.
20 year prime, the focus on best season, ie points is misguided here like usual.Most people are really into 2013-2014, when four of the top five players behind him in PPG missed between 20-45 games, which created an illusion of individual dominance.
There’s really little else, other than the old favorite of cobbling together three separate seasons and pretending it is one.
20 year prime, the focus on best season, ie points is misguided here like usual.
Roy in 1986 15-5 1.93 GA .923 save% with 1 SO he faced 504 shotsI'll admit Hasek was clearly above Roy (in the regular season anyway) while their careers overlapped. Roy's peak was arguably as good as Hasek's in the early 90s and his playoff resume puts him on the same playing field though.
Brodeur was great but he never hit the level of a peak Hasek/Roy. Despite being 10 years younger than both, he was Roy's (who wasn't even at the height of his powers) equal at best (he finished slightly ahead of Roy in Vezina finishes, they were close enough to be neck at neck). He doesn't have anything in his resume on the level of a late 90s Hasek (or Roy's vezina seasons), and he doesn't have a 93 or 86 level smythe performance either. Great player obviously but a tier below.
Man if that isn't a biased sentence showing intent I dunno what is?Naturally, when a player wins a single Art Ross after past the age of 19, gets outperformed by the likes of Benn (twice), Tavares, and Kane at ages 27 and 28, and stops being a legitimate contender in the scoring race after 29, there’s an interest in shifting where we focus.