Eye of Ra
Grandmaster General of the International boards
ummm No,
Zib shouldn’t be their 1st line center.
yes he should. pettersson is not as mature and backstrom is getting old. zibanejad is in his prime
ummm No,
Zib shouldn’t be their 1st line center.
A fast look at the defensemen that play at least 17min per game even strength, minimum 41 games played. Sample size same as before, last two regular seasons.
GA EV/min, is goals against per even strength minute played. Then PPG is points per game as normal.
View attachment 468882
Just like you don't want Erik Karlsson in his current form on the squad , you don't want Dahlin either. They are both awful even strength past 2 seasons.
If i'm playing McDavid there is no defencemen I rather want facing him than Adam Larsson.
about ek and dahlin, there is no need for them when we have klingberg, hedman and OEL. we got offensive skilled d-man.
Hedman - Ekholm
Brodin - Klingberg
OEL - Lindholm
I would have Adam Larsson instead of OEL but otherwise I agree with that lineup.
The size of the sample is fairly good(you'd obviously want more, as it's still pretty low), but the metric is bad. If player A plays with Högberg as their goalie, and B plays with Grubauer as theirs, with A facing much better competition, your stat shows that they're equal to each other, and you followed it by presenting Larsson as the best defenseman Sweden has by saying you'd want him against McDavid(without the context of him playing alongside McDavid, which doesn't really mean anything. McDavid is speed, not like he, or any player, goes 100% at scrimmages).You forget that the stats are two seasons, it's a good sample size. It's not particulary vulnerable to your arguements. I'm not really sure what you are argueing at all tbh.
I never said that that is the list of who I think is the best defencemen sweden has only that i don't think that players on the bottom half don't belong on Tre Kronor. I like that Adam Larsson has trained against McDavid for many years and knows him like noone else on the team.
You are skirting my question, why does Dahlin have these caveats(mostly weak imo, you can't just ignore stats by cherry picking abitrarily important what ifs) beyond his irrelevant potential?
well i think there is 8 spots. there is room for both
The size of the sample is fairly good(you'd obviously want more, as it's still pretty low), but the metric is bad. If player A plays with Högberg as their goalie, and B plays with Grubauer as theirs, with A facing much better competition, your stat shows that they're equal to each other, and you followed it by presenting Larsson as the best defenseman Sweden has by saying you'd want him against McDavid(without the context of him playing alongside McDavid, which doesn't really mean anything. McDavid is speed, not like he, or any player, goes 100% at scrimmages).
I'm not skirting around your question? Why wouldn't Dahlin get the caveats of playing for a Krueger-led Sabres? Why wouldn't Pettersson get the Covid+injurt caveats? Zibanejad covid? Hedman injury? If a coach heavily restricts how you play(in all 3 zones!), why wouldn't you get a caveat? I'll also give Ullmark the caveat of playing under the Sabres. Very interested in how he plays in Boston. Let the goalie wars between Lehner, Marky Mark, & Ullmark begin. The one who has played the best until the Olympics gets my vote for the starting gig.
My main issue with the stats you presented weren't regarding Dahlin btw, but I can see why it was taken that way.I was planning to standardize the goaltending across all players, I just didn't have time before i had to leave that's why a I wrote "fast". I wouldn't say it's bad though, the metric still shows the players we know to be bad defensivly like Karlsson and Dahlin to be bad defensively.
The problem with your caveats is that they are applied on one player but not compared to what ever player Dahlin would take his spot from. They are also subjective and speculative in nature, which is in stark contrast with your arguement against the stats which some has merits and some doesn't.
My main issue with the stats you presented weren't regarding Dahlin btw, but I can see why it was taken that way.
The stats from Dahlin's tenure under Granato exists, but it's a small sample, anyway, he would have an offensive role for me, as would Klingberg. I want two two-way pairings, with a shutdown bottom pairing. The top 2 pairings would be anchored by Hedman, & Brodin. Bottom by Ekholm. Lindholm/Larsson would complement Ekholm.
yes he should. pettersson is not as mature and backstrom is getting old. zibanejad is in his prime
zibanejad had covid at the beginning of the year and was terrible for like 2 months. over the past 2 seasons though hes clearly produced at a better pace than any other swedes.The why did Backstrom out produce Zibby last year?
The why did Backstrom out produce Zibby last year?
Zibby is trash defensively
And not great at driving play
easy pass on him being the first line center.
In international hockey they usually have 22 players dressed for every game, which probably means 2 goalies, 7 defenders and 13 forwards.Are we actually dressing 8 defencemen each game though, or are those extra just for injuries?
The big list is for player's to enter the Olympic anti-doping protocol. So some players will be tested without ever going to the Olympics.In international hockey they usually have 22 players dressed for every game, which probably means 2 goalies, 7 defenders and 13 forwards.
The big list has to
Is it anyone who knows the point in having to send the pre-roster with 50 players already? Some good player could perform good during the season and not be able to participate. Remember what happened to Hampus Lindholm in 2014 when he had his break but was not on the list and then was out of the Olympics. So silly.
Sveriges bruttotrupp till vinter-OS inlämnad
For reference:In international hockey they usually have 22 players dressed for every game, which probably means 2 goalies, 7 defenders and 13 forwards.
Is it anyone who knows the point in having to send the pre-roster with 50 players already? Some good player could perform good during the season and not be able to participate. Remember what happened to Hampus Lindholm in 2014 when he had his break but was not on the list and then was out of the Olympics. So silly.
Sveriges bruttotrupp till vinter-OS inlämnad
In international hockey they usually have 22 players dressed for every game, which probably means 2 goalies, 7 defenders and 13 forwards.
Is it anyone who knows the point in having to send the pre-roster with 50 players already? Some good player could perform good during the season and not be able to participate. Remember what happened to Hampus Lindholm in 2014 when he had his break but was not on the list and then was out of the Olympics. So silly.
Sveriges bruttotrupp till vinter-OS inlämnad
And last season it was over 100 players from Sweden in the league. 50 names seems so low and do other sports have this protocol?For reference:
There's 67 Swedish skaters expected to play regularly/semi-regularly in the NHL this season.
The 5 goalies gotta be Lehner, Markström, Ullmark, Forsberg, & Gustavsson.
90 skaters, and 9 goalies for a total of 99 Swedish players played at least 1 game last season.And last season it was over 100 players from Sweden in the league. 50 names seems so low and do other sports have this protocol?
Oh god. Every swedish coach always take some washed up SHL veteran. You know that 40 year old Joel Lundqvist will get a spot.
We should take no one. Only NHLers.Joel dont wanna play for Tre Kronor anymore. So it will be mr.soft, Dennis Rasmssusen. I rather have Joel on the team than him. But the best option would be Anton Lander i think.