kelsier
Registered User
- Aug 17, 2013
- 4,280
- 1,741
It's not an excuse, it's a fact. Did you watch the game even? Kupari/Heponiemi/Nyman spent at least a minute in their own zone AT LEAST ONCE, so that increased their ice time above expected.
Come again? Why would I go onto specifics about shift lengths and what not if I didn't watch the game? Furthermore I never even claimed that the first line didn't struggle long shift(s) at their own zone. Yet your not only explaining, but justifying the lack of TOI for the second unit with first line spending over a minute on the defense "AT LEAST ONCE". Like seriously? There's 60 minutes in one game so even if they had two or three struggling moments that wouldn't explain the distribution. It doesn't even seem like you're aware of what each of them played. I'll break it down for you:
Heponiemi 19:54
Kupari 17:30
Nyman 14:54
Tolvanen 16:35
Kakko: 13:30
Lundell: 14:15
Now I already explained the peak in Hepo's TOI but other than that, even the first line didn't play that much despite of these lengthy shifts you referred earlier. What does that tell you? We know Finland didn't spend the entire game at the penalty box, nor did the 1st line eat all the minutes that could've been shared with 2nd line (look at the player TOI above). There's only one answer that can be backed up by both statistics and simple observation (watching the game), the ice time was distributed quite evenly between all lines, far more so than in a normal hockey game where team runs four lines and the top six get to play more minutes than lower bottom six. That's completely on Ahokas and for someone failing to take a note on that even while watching the game to me sounds just plain strange. Cause I didn't even have to check the game statistics to know ELK didn't play much. When a team is trailing goals going into the third period the coach should do couple of things i) utilize the scoring lines with more and extended shifts ii) tighten the core players and if necessary scratch the low performing players and especially if you need more than one goal, cut down to three lines. None of that really happened. Then when people wonder why did we lose this one? Sorry but a line playing "at least once" lengthy shift doesn't really cut it. There were even two players from third line that played more than Kakko on a game that we were trailing since the first period. So again, the end result was a sum of bad decisions due to incompetence.