kerrabria
Registered User
- May 3, 2018
- 4,219
- 5,311
It's already generously weighted for late round success. Looking just a given team's postseason results:I think you need to weight late round success a lot heavier. LA should not be outside the top 5 for their 3 year reign. Certainly not behind the cupless Rags, and SJ is also quite high for what little they actually accomplished.
- 1 point for making the playoffs
- 2 points for winning a round
- 3 points for winning two rounds
- 5 points for winning three rounds
- 12 points for winning the cup
The Kings have just been a bad or mediocre team for most of the past 20 years. As opposed to say the Rangers, which have been a very, very good team that just never got the ultimate prize.