Miller Time
Registered User
- Sep 16, 2004
- 24,310
- 17,162
Not a chance. And I don't even like Pitlick that much. but he is a better injury replacement than Lindstrom, by far. I'm ok with trading Pitlick and giving him a fresh start, just saying that Lindstrom has zero value.
Oufff... I'll just say that I think your player evaluation is way off. Pitlick hardly got injury replacement time in our injury depleted roster last year.
While neither are very valuable Lindstrom is by far the more valuable asset, both on ice and as a trade piece.
The market certainly suggested as much this past summer.
If we keep Primeau it is that he is playing at least as well as Allen. In that case, we can start with a pace to play Monty 40 games and Primeau and Allen 21 each, and see where that evolves.
That makes no sense at all.
If the team wants to keep Primeau because they think he's the future#1, playing him 20 games next year would be idiotic.
Likewise, if they view Monty as #1, no reason not to play him 50+ games to be sure before signing him to the extension required.
That's a totally unrealistic scenario. I'll gladly buy you a beer if that's what happens (injury notwithstanding).