Ivan13
Not posting anymore
So Avs need a 3rd RHD
Avs need top 6 talent, they have plenty of depth D.
PS
If Vancouver wants to throw Virtanen our way on the cheap (don't see hwy they would) I don't see any deal that makes sense from Avs POV.
So Avs need a 3rd RHD
JVR + Gardiner +2nd in 17 (leafs choice as they have 3)
For
Virtanen + Tanev + 3rd in 17
Don't think that's enough tbh
JVR + Gardiner +2nd in 17 (leafs choice as they have 3)
For
Virtanen + Tanev + 3rd in 17
JVR + Gardiner +2nd in 17 (leafs choice as they have 3)
For
Virtanen + Tanev + 3rd in 17
Avs need top 6 talent, they have plenty of depth D.
PS
If Vancouver wants to throw Virtanen our way on the cheap (don't see hwy they would) I don't see any deal that makes sense from Avs POV.
Way too much from Toronto.
Also not a fan of Virtanen at all. Hockey IQ is just way too low to be a regular NHL player.
Oh ok if you say so. lol
JVR + Gardiner +2nd in 17 (leafs choice as they have 3)
For
Virtanen + Tanev + 3rd in 17
Don't think that's enough tbh
I don't think it's awful either as an outsider. I think there's something to work with tbh.
JVR for Tanev straight up. Tanev is great and all but so is JVR. The difference between the two players is NOT Gardiner
Too much from Toronto.
Don't say that often..
Would love Tanev in TO, but there just isn't a deal that works. Anything we would do would be Players like JVR/Kadri for defensive help....that doesn't work for Vancouver. Toronto won't be dealing youth or picks at this point.
Tanev does nothing for Buffalo but it's the thought that counts, I guess?
Tanev lets you lose Bogo to Vegas. He also gives you a pairing in Kulikov/Tanev that finally gets Risto away from so many Dzone starts.
Liferleafer is right. There's no deal to be made here. Canucks need youth and would be asking for guys like Marner/Nylander. That's gonna happen. JVR doesn't do anything for Vancouver. A guy who's just gonna walk as a UFA does nothing for the rebuild. Gardiner is a lateral swap at best. I like Kadri, but we can't trade Tanev for a 2C type. We need upside.
Let's just move on.
There is a deal, but not many Leafs fans would be ok with it.
2017 1st (top 5 protected)+ Bracco/Dermott + 2018 SJ 2nd (if we make the playoffs this year or it's a top 5 pick and make it next year when the pick transfers.
There is a deal, but not many Leafs fans would be ok with it.
2017 1st (top 5 protected)+ Bracco/Dermott + 2018 SJ 2nd (if we make the playoffs this year or it's a top 5 pick and make it next year when the pick transfers.
There is a deal, but not many Leafs fans would be ok with it.
2017 1st (top 5 protected)+ Bracco/Dermott + 2018 SJ 2nd (if we make the playoffs this year or it's a top 5 pick and make it next year when the pick transfers.
No thank you. Too many small pieces, and the way Benning drafts I don't think that 1st will be used effectively.
JVR + Gardiner +2nd in 17 (leafs choice as they have 3)
For
Virtanen + Tanev + 3rd in 17
In terms of value, it's pretty close for both sides.
But as a Canucks fan, it doesn't fit our needs. There isn't a deal here. We need a future core. We need high-end upside young players. We need AAA prospects. That's not a slight to guys like Bracco and Dermott who I think are pretty good. But we have prospects of that calibre (not as many as the Leafs, but still). We need the Marner/Nylander calibre prospects. We need that extra top-five pick. We absolutely cannot trade Tanev for less than that.
It's not something we can do. And understandably Leafs fans will not want to give up a Marner/Nylander/top-five pick.
So there just isn't anything that can get done here.
There is one small piece, one huge one. That doesn't invalidate the huge one.No thank you. Too many small pieces, and the way Benning drafts I don't think that 1st will be used effectively.
Conversation ends. Is Tanev worth it? Maybe. Are the Leafs in a position to trade 1st round picks? Nope.
Again...no deal that works for both teams.